back to index

Tyler Cowen: Economic Growth & the Fight Against Conformity & Mediocrity | Lex Fridman Podcast #174


small model | large model

link |
00:00:00.000
The following is a conversation with Tyler Cohen,
link |
00:00:02.520
an economist at George Mason University
link |
00:00:05.000
and co creator of an amazing economics blog
link |
00:00:08.200
called Marginal Revolution, author of many books,
link |
00:00:11.520
including The Great Stagnation, Average Is Over
link |
00:00:14.840
and his most recent Big Business,
link |
00:00:17.240
A Love Letter to an American Antihero.
link |
00:00:20.240
He's truly a polymath in his work,
link |
00:00:22.520
including his love for food,
link |
00:00:24.280
which makes this amazing podcast
link |
00:00:26.440
called Conversations with Tyler really fun to listen to.
link |
00:00:30.880
Quick mention of our sponsors,
link |
00:00:32.680
Linode, ExpressVPN, Simplisafe and Public Goods.
link |
00:00:37.380
Check them out in the description to support this podcast.
link |
00:00:41.040
As a side note, given Tyler's culinary explorations,
link |
00:00:45.160
let me say that one of the things that makes me sad
link |
00:00:48.380
about my love hate relationship with food
link |
00:00:51.040
is that while I've found a simple diet,
link |
00:00:53.840
plain meat, veggies, that makes me happy in day to day life,
link |
00:00:58.200
I sometimes wish I had the mental ability
link |
00:01:00.120
to moderate consumption of food
link |
00:01:02.040
so that I could truly enjoy meals
link |
00:01:03.760
that go way outside of that diet.
link |
00:01:06.120
I've seen my mom, for example,
link |
00:01:07.520
enjoy a single piece of chocolate
link |
00:01:09.680
and yet if I were to eat one piece of chocolate,
link |
00:01:12.500
the odds are high that I would end up eating the whole box.
link |
00:01:15.940
This is definitely something I would like to fix
link |
00:01:18.200
because some of the amazing artistry in this world
link |
00:01:21.840
happens in the kitchen and some of the richest
link |
00:01:24.160
human experiences happen over a unique meal.
link |
00:01:27.560
I recently was eating cheeseburgers
link |
00:01:29.360
with Joe Rogan and John Donahue late at night in Austin,
link |
00:01:33.520
talking about jiu jitsu and life
link |
00:01:35.680
and I was distinctly aware of the magic of that experience.
link |
00:01:40.160
Magic made possible by the incredibly
link |
00:01:42.640
delicious cheeseburgers.
link |
00:01:44.460
This is the Lex Friedman podcast
link |
00:01:47.120
and here is my conversation with Tyler Cohen.
link |
00:01:50.060
Would you say economics is more art or science
link |
00:01:54.420
or philosophy or even magic?
link |
00:01:57.100
What is it?
link |
00:01:58.120
Economics is interesting because it's all of the above.
link |
00:02:01.460
To start with magic, the notion that you can
link |
00:02:03.900
make some change and simply everyone's better off,
link |
00:02:06.620
that is a kind of modern magic
link |
00:02:08.420
that has replaced old style magic.
link |
00:02:11.020
It's an art in the sense that the models are not very exact.
link |
00:02:14.620
It's a science in the sense that occasionally
link |
00:02:16.580
propositions are falsified.
link |
00:02:18.540
Are a few basic things we know
link |
00:02:20.860
and however trivial they may sound,
link |
00:02:22.360
if you don't know them, you're out of luck.
link |
00:02:24.580
So all of the above.
link |
00:02:26.480
But from my outsider's perspective,
link |
00:02:28.580
economics is sometimes able to formulate very simple,
link |
00:02:33.740
almost like E equals MC squared,
link |
00:02:36.100
general models of how our human society will function
link |
00:02:40.020
when you do a certain thing.
link |
00:02:42.800
But it seems impossible or almost way too optimistic
link |
00:02:47.420
to think that a single formula
link |
00:02:49.420
or just a set of simple principles
link |
00:02:51.620
can describe behavior of billions of human beings
link |
00:02:56.460
with all the complexity that we have involved.
link |
00:02:58.620
So do you have a sense there's a hope for economics
link |
00:03:01.220
to have those kinds of physics level descriptions
link |
00:03:06.740
and models of the world?
link |
00:03:08.100
Or is it just our desperate attempts as humans
link |
00:03:10.060
to make sense of it even though it's more desperate
link |
00:03:12.980
than rigorous and serious and actually predictable
link |
00:03:17.980
like a physics type science?
link |
00:03:20.540
I don't think economics will ever be very predictive.
link |
00:03:24.160
It's most useful for helping you ask better questions.
link |
00:03:27.260
You look at something like game theory.
link |
00:03:29.420
Well, game theory never predicted USA and USSR
link |
00:03:32.660
would have a war, would not have a war.
link |
00:03:35.060
But trying to think through the logic of strategic conflict,
link |
00:03:38.140
if you know game theory,
link |
00:03:39.460
it's just a much more interesting discussion.
link |
00:03:42.500
Are you surprised that we,
link |
00:03:44.540
speaking of the Soviet Union and the United States
link |
00:03:47.420
and speaking of game theory,
link |
00:03:48.780
are you surprised that we haven't destroyed ourselves
link |
00:03:50.900
with nuclear weapons yet?
link |
00:03:52.020
Like that simple formulation
link |
00:03:54.280
of mutually assured destruction,
link |
00:03:56.300
that's a good example of an explanation
link |
00:03:58.940
that perhaps allows us to ask better questions.
link |
00:04:02.340
But it seems to have actually described the reality
link |
00:04:06.100
of why we haven't destroyed ourselves
link |
00:04:08.340
with these ultra powerful weapons.
link |
00:04:10.820
Are you surprised, do you think
link |
00:04:13.100
the game theoretic explanation is at all accurate there?
link |
00:04:16.880
I think we will destroy each other with those weapons.
link |
00:04:19.920
Eventually.
link |
00:04:20.760
Eventually.
link |
00:04:21.940
Look, it's a very low probability event.
link |
00:04:24.320
So I'm not surprised it hasn't happened yet.
link |
00:04:26.700
I'm a little surprised it came as close as it did.
link |
00:04:29.500
You know, you're general thinking,
link |
00:04:30.980
realizing it might've just been a flock of birds
link |
00:04:33.100
or it wasn't a first strike attack from the USA.
link |
00:04:35.700
We got very lucky on that one.
link |
00:04:38.060
But if you just keep on running the clock
link |
00:04:39.940
on a low probability event, it will happen.
link |
00:04:42.900
And it may not be USA and China,
link |
00:04:45.620
USA and Russia, whatever.
link |
00:04:47.160
You know, it could be the Saudis and Turkey.
link |
00:04:49.200
And it might not be nuclear weapons,
link |
00:04:50.580
it might be some other destruction.
link |
00:04:51.580
Bio weapons.
link |
00:04:52.740
But it simply will happen is my view.
link |
00:04:55.580
And I've argued at best we have 700 or 800 years
link |
00:04:58.820
and that's being generous.
link |
00:05:00.240
A worst?
link |
00:05:01.080
How long we got?
link |
00:05:03.020
Well, maybe it's like a post on arrival process, right?
link |
00:05:06.380
So tiny probability could come any time.
link |
00:05:09.540
Probably not in your lifetime.
link |
00:05:12.020
But the chance presumably increases
link |
00:05:15.700
the cheaper weapons of mass destruction are.
link |
00:05:18.780
So the Poisson process description doesn't take
link |
00:05:22.380
in consideration the game theoretic aspect.
link |
00:05:24.340
So another way to consider is repeated games,
link |
00:05:28.060
iterative games.
link |
00:05:29.700
So is there something about our human nature
link |
00:05:33.440
that allows us to fight against probability?
link |
00:05:37.260
Reduce, like the closer we get to trouble,
link |
00:05:40.940
the more we're able to figure out how to avoid trouble.
link |
00:05:43.840
The same thing is for when you take exams
link |
00:05:46.140
or you go and take classes,
link |
00:05:48.700
the closer or paper deadlines,
link |
00:05:50.620
the closer you get to a deadline,
link |
00:05:52.220
the better you start to perform
link |
00:05:53.480
and get your shit together and actually get stuff done.
link |
00:05:56.220
I'm really not so negative on human nature.
link |
00:05:58.720
And as an economist,
link |
00:05:59.760
I very much see the gains from cooperation.
link |
00:06:02.900
But if you just ask, are there outliers in history?
link |
00:06:05.260
Like was there a Hitler, for instance?
link |
00:06:07.100
Obviously.
link |
00:06:08.140
And again, you let the clock tick,
link |
00:06:09.980
another Hitler with nuclear weapons,
link |
00:06:12.260
doesn't per se care about his own destruction,
link |
00:06:15.140
it will happen.
link |
00:06:16.460
So your sense is fundamentally people are good,
link |
00:06:20.240
but outliers happen.
link |
00:06:21.080
A trembling hand equilibrium is what we would call it.
link |
00:06:23.480
Trembling hand equilibrium?
link |
00:06:25.420
That the basic logic is for cooperation,
link |
00:06:28.460
which is mostly what we've seen, even between enemies.
link |
00:06:32.420
But every now and then someone does something crazy
link |
00:06:35.020
and you don't know how to react to it.
link |
00:06:36.800
And you can't always beat Hitler.
link |
00:06:39.500
Sometimes Hitler drags you down.
link |
00:06:41.680
To push back, is it possible
link |
00:06:44.620
that the crazier the person, the less likely they are,
link |
00:06:49.700
and in a way where we're safe,
link |
00:06:52.900
meaning like, this is the kind of proposition,
link |
00:06:56.500
I had the discussion with my dad as a physicist about this,
link |
00:06:59.580
where he thinks that like if you have a graph,
link |
00:07:04.580
like evil people can't also be geniuses.
link |
00:07:08.220
So this is his defense why evil people
link |
00:07:11.060
will not get control of nuclear weapons,
link |
00:07:13.380
because to be truly evil.
link |
00:07:15.940
But evil meaning sort of, you can argue that,
link |
00:07:19.700
not even the evil of Hitler we're talking about,
link |
00:07:22.420
because Hitler had a kind of view of Germany
link |
00:07:24.500
and all those kinds of, there's like,
link |
00:07:26.460
he probably deluded himself and the people around him
link |
00:07:29.540
to think that he's actually doing good for the world,
link |
00:07:31.340
similar with Stalin and so on.
link |
00:07:33.180
By evil, I mean more like almost like terrorists
link |
00:07:35.740
to where they wanna destroy themselves and the world.
link |
00:07:39.820
Like those people will never be able to be
link |
00:07:42.820
actually skilled enough to do,
link |
00:07:44.820
to deliver that kind of mass scale destruction.
link |
00:07:47.880
So the hope is that it's very unlikely
link |
00:07:52.720
that the kind of evil that would lead to extinctions
link |
00:07:55.460
of humans or mass destruction is so unlikely
link |
00:07:59.500
that we're able to last way longer than some 100, 800 years.
link |
00:08:03.680
Is that?
link |
00:08:04.520
It's very unlikely.
link |
00:08:06.060
In that sense, I accept the argument,
link |
00:08:08.180
but that's why you need to let the clock tick.
link |
00:08:10.540
It's also the best argument for bureaucracy.
link |
00:08:13.180
To negotiate a bureaucracy,
link |
00:08:14.760
it actually selects against pure evil
link |
00:08:16.980
because you need to build alliances.
link |
00:08:18.860
So bureaucracy in that regard is great, right?
link |
00:08:21.020
It keeps out the worst apples.
link |
00:08:23.300
But look, put it this way,
link |
00:08:24.340
could you imagine 35 years from now,
link |
00:08:26.980
the Osama bin Laden of the future
link |
00:08:29.680
has nukes or very bad bio weapons?
link |
00:08:32.540
It seems to me you can.
link |
00:08:34.180
And Osama was pretty evil.
link |
00:08:36.020
And actually even he failed, right?
link |
00:08:38.720
But nonetheless, that's what the 700 or 800 years
link |
00:08:41.780
is there for.
link |
00:08:42.980
And there might be destructive technologies
link |
00:08:44.940
that don't have such a high cost of production
link |
00:08:48.660
or such a high learning curve.
link |
00:08:50.740
Like cyber attacks or artificial intelligence,
link |
00:08:53.940
all those kinds of things.
link |
00:08:55.620
Yeah.
link |
00:08:56.460
I mean, let me ask you a question.
link |
00:08:57.580
Let's say you could as an act of will,
link |
00:09:00.060
by spending a million dollars,
link |
00:09:01.660
obliterate any city on earth and everyone in it dies.
link |
00:09:05.300
And you'll get caught and you'll be sentenced to death,
link |
00:09:08.460
but you can make it happen just by willing it.
link |
00:09:10.980
How many months does it take before that happens?
link |
00:09:15.900
So the obvious answer is like very soon.
link |
00:09:18.020
There's probably a good answer for that
link |
00:09:19.420
because you can consider how many millionaires there are,
link |
00:09:21.460
how many you could look at that, right?
link |
00:09:22.740
Right.
link |
00:09:23.660
I have a sense that there's just people
link |
00:09:26.620
that have a million dollars.
link |
00:09:30.220
I mean, there's a certain amount,
link |
00:09:31.420
but have a million dollars,
link |
00:09:33.660
have other interests that will outweigh
link |
00:09:39.020
the interest of destroying an entire city.
link |
00:09:42.020
Like there's a particular,
link |
00:09:43.980
like, I mean, maybe that's a hope.
link |
00:09:46.620
It's why we should be nice to the wealthy too, right?
link |
00:09:48.900
Yeah.
link |
00:09:51.300
Yeah, all that trash talking as Bill Gates,
link |
00:09:53.900
we should stop that
link |
00:09:54.780
because that doesn't inspire the other future Bill Gates
link |
00:09:58.580
is to be nice to the world.
link |
00:10:01.020
That's true.
link |
00:10:01.940
But your sense is the cheaper it gets to destroy the world,
link |
00:10:05.380
the more likely it becomes.
link |
00:10:07.460
Now, when I say destroy the world,
link |
00:10:08.900
there's a trick in there.
link |
00:10:09.740
I don't think literally every human will die,
link |
00:10:12.740
but it would set back civilization
link |
00:10:14.940
by an extraordinary degree.
link |
00:10:16.380
It's then just hard to predict what comes next.
link |
00:10:19.260
But a catastrophe where everyone dies,
link |
00:10:21.580
that probably has to be something more like an asteroid
link |
00:10:24.100
or supernova.
link |
00:10:26.140
And those are purely exogenous for the time being, at least.
link |
00:10:29.660
So I immigrated to this country.
link |
00:10:32.180
I was born in the Soviet Union in Russia and...
link |
00:10:36.100
Which one?
link |
00:10:37.140
Which one?
link |
00:10:37.980
I guess it's an important question.
link |
00:10:39.620
You were born in the Soviet Union, right?
link |
00:10:41.460
Yes, I was born in the Soviet Union.
link |
00:10:43.340
The rest is details, but I grew up in Moscow, Russia.
link |
00:10:47.500
But I came to this country,
link |
00:10:49.860
and this country even back there,
link |
00:10:52.140
but it's always symbolized to me a place of opportunity
link |
00:10:55.820
where everybody could build the most incredible things,
link |
00:11:01.140
especially in the engineering side of things.
link |
00:11:03.380
Just invent and build and scale
link |
00:11:06.540
and have a huge impact on the world.
link |
00:11:08.700
And that's been, to me, the...
link |
00:11:11.060
That's my version of the American ideal, the American dream.
link |
00:11:14.060
Do you think the American dream is still there?
link |
00:11:20.340
Do you think...
link |
00:11:21.180
What do you think of that notion in itself,
link |
00:11:23.540
like from an economics perspective,
link |
00:11:25.180
from a human perspective, is it still alive?
link |
00:11:28.180
And how do you think about it?
link |
00:11:30.020
The American dream.
link |
00:11:30.860
The American dream is mostly still there.
link |
00:11:33.540
If you look at which groups are the highest earners,
link |
00:11:37.340
it is individuals from India and individuals from Iran,
link |
00:11:41.340
which is a fairly new development.
link |
00:11:43.300
Great for them, not necessarily easy.
link |
00:11:45.940
Both you could call persons of color,
link |
00:11:48.540
may have faced discrimination,
link |
00:11:50.300
also on the grounds of religion, yet they've done it.
link |
00:11:53.780
That's amazing.
link |
00:11:54.620
It says great things about America.
link |
00:11:56.540
Now, if you look at native born Americans,
link |
00:11:58.580
the story's trickier.
link |
00:12:00.580
People think intergenerational mobility
link |
00:12:03.660
has declined a lot recently,
link |
00:12:05.260
but it has not for native born Americans.
link |
00:12:08.580
For about, I think, 40 years, it's been fairly constant,
link |
00:12:11.820
which is sort of good,
link |
00:12:13.700
but compared to much earlier times,
link |
00:12:16.900
it was much higher in the past.
link |
00:12:19.340
I'm not sure we can replicate that,
link |
00:12:20.940
because look, go to the beginning of the 20th century,
link |
00:12:23.460
very few Americans finish high school,
link |
00:12:26.700
or even have much wealth.
link |
00:12:27.860
There's not much credentialism.
link |
00:12:29.180
There aren't that many credentials.
link |
00:12:30.860
So there's more upward mobility
link |
00:12:33.020
across the generations than today.
link |
00:12:35.660
And it's a good thing that we had it.
link |
00:12:37.300
I'm not sure we should blame the modern world
link |
00:12:40.140
for not being able to reproduce that.
link |
00:12:43.300
But look, the general issue of
link |
00:12:45.460
who gets into Harvard or Cornell?
link |
00:12:47.660
Is there an injustice?
link |
00:12:49.340
Should we fix that?
link |
00:12:50.700
Is there too little opportunity for the bottom,
link |
00:12:52.780
say, half of Americans?
link |
00:12:54.340
Absolutely.
link |
00:12:55.460
It's a disgrace how this country has evolved in that way.
link |
00:12:58.740
And in that sense, the American dream is clearly ailing.
link |
00:13:01.940
But it has had problems from the beginning,
link |
00:13:04.420
for blacks, for women, for many other groups.
link |
00:13:07.100
I mean, isn't that the whole challenge of opportunity
link |
00:13:10.060
and freedom is that it's hard,
link |
00:13:12.060
and the difficulty of how hard it is to move up in society
link |
00:13:16.780
is unequal often, and that's the injustice of society.
link |
00:13:20.260
But the whole point of that freedom
link |
00:13:23.100
is that over time, it becomes better and better.
link |
00:13:25.660
You start to fix the leaks, the issues,
link |
00:13:31.300
and it keeps progressing in that kind of way.
link |
00:13:35.140
But ultimately, there's always the opportunity,
link |
00:13:37.340
even if it's harder, there's the opportunity
link |
00:13:39.860
to create something truly special,
link |
00:13:41.780
to move up, to be president, to be a leader
link |
00:13:46.660
in whatever the industry that you're passionate about.
link |
00:13:49.020
We each have podcasts, right, in English.
link |
00:13:51.460
The value of joining that American English language network
link |
00:13:56.060
is much higher today than it was 30 years ago,
link |
00:13:58.260
mostly because of the internet.
link |
00:14:00.300
So that makes immigration returns themselves skewed.
link |
00:14:03.860
So going to the US, Canada, or the UK,
link |
00:14:07.180
I think has become much more valuable in relative terms
link |
00:14:09.940
than, say, going to France,
link |
00:14:11.340
which is still a pretty well off, very nice country.
link |
00:14:16.580
If you had gone to France,
link |
00:14:17.700
your chance of having a globally known podcast
link |
00:14:20.180
would be much smaller.
link |
00:14:21.740
Yeah, this is the interesting thing
link |
00:14:24.820
about how much intellectual influence
link |
00:14:27.660
the United States has.
link |
00:14:28.580
I don't know if it's connected to what we're discussing here,
link |
00:14:31.940
the freedom and opportunity of the American dream,
link |
00:14:34.980
or does it make any sense to you
link |
00:14:37.380
that we have so much impact on the rest of the world
link |
00:14:41.300
in terms of ideas?
link |
00:14:45.500
Is it just simply because English
link |
00:14:47.540
is the primary language of the world,
link |
00:14:49.740
or is there something fundamental to the United States
link |
00:14:52.100
that drives the development of ideas?
link |
00:14:55.500
It's almost like what's cool, what's entertaining,
link |
00:14:59.780
what's like meme culture, the internet culture,
link |
00:15:06.220
the philosophers, the intellectuals, the podcasts,
link |
00:15:09.220
the movies, music, all that stuff, driving culture.
link |
00:15:13.300
There's something above and beyond language
link |
00:15:15.140
in the United States.
link |
00:15:16.620
It's a sense of entertainment really mattering,
link |
00:15:19.140
how to connect with your audience,
link |
00:15:20.940
being direct and getting to the point,
link |
00:15:23.700
how humor is integrated even with science
link |
00:15:27.260
that is pretty strongly represented here,
link |
00:15:30.300
much more so than on the European continent.
link |
00:15:32.660
Britain has its own version of this,
link |
00:15:34.300
which it does very well,
link |
00:15:36.140
and not surprisingly, they're hugely influential
link |
00:15:38.340
in music, comedy, most of the other areas you mentioned.
link |
00:15:41.940
Canada, yes, but their best talent tends to come here,
link |
00:15:44.820
but you could say it's like a broader North American thing
link |
00:15:47.980
and give them their fair share of credit.
link |
00:15:50.220
What about science?
link |
00:15:52.180
There's a sense higher education is really strong,
link |
00:15:56.700
research is really strong in the United States,
link |
00:15:58.660
but it just feels like, culturally speaking,
link |
00:16:01.940
when we zoom out, scientists aren't very cool here.
link |
00:16:07.540
Most people wouldn't be able to name
link |
00:16:09.460
basically a single scientist.
link |
00:16:11.180
Maybe they would say like, they would say what,
link |
00:16:13.260
like Einstein and Neil deGrasse Tyson maybe,
link |
00:16:16.620
and Neil deGrasse Tyson isn't exactly a scientist,
link |
00:16:18.820
he's a science communicator.
link |
00:16:20.420
So there's not the same kind of admiration
link |
00:16:25.420
of science and innovators as there is of like,
link |
00:16:30.060
athletes or actors, actresses, musicians.
link |
00:16:34.980
Well, you can become a celebrity scientist if you want to.
link |
00:16:38.060
It may or may not be best for science.
link |
00:16:40.180
And we have Spock from Star Trek, who is still a big deal,
link |
00:16:44.340
but look at it this way.
link |
00:16:45.780
Which country is most comfortable
link |
00:16:47.420
with inegalitarian rewards for scientists,
link |
00:16:50.900
whether it's fame or money?
link |
00:16:52.420
And I still think it's here.
link |
00:16:53.420
Some of that's just the tax rate.
link |
00:16:55.380
Some of it is a lot of America is set up
link |
00:16:57.700
for rich people to live really well.
link |
00:17:00.220
And again, that's going to attract a lot of top talent.
link |
00:17:02.740
And you ask like, the two best vaccines.
link |
00:17:05.220
I know the Pfizer vaccine is sort of from Germany,
link |
00:17:08.020
sort of from Turkey, but it's nonetheless
link |
00:17:11.180
being distributed through the United States.
link |
00:17:13.260
Moderna, an ethnic Armenian immigrant through Lebanon,
link |
00:17:17.860
first to Canada, then down here to Boston, Cambridge area.
link |
00:17:21.380
Those are incredible vaccines.
link |
00:17:22.820
And US nailed it.
link |
00:17:25.180
Yeah, well, that's more almost like the,
link |
00:17:28.780
I don't know what you would call it,
link |
00:17:29.940
engineering, the sort of scaling.
link |
00:17:32.700
That's what US is really good at,
link |
00:17:34.660
not just inventing of ideas,
link |
00:17:36.100
but taking an idea and actually building the thing
link |
00:17:38.220
and scaling it and being able to distribute it at scale.
link |
00:17:42.580
I think some people would attribute that
link |
00:17:44.980
to the general word of capitalism.
link |
00:17:49.580
I don't know if you would.
link |
00:17:51.260
Sure.
link |
00:17:52.100
What in your views are the pros and cons of capitalism
link |
00:17:57.500
as it's implemented in America?
link |
00:17:59.740
I don't know if you would say
link |
00:18:00.620
capitalism really exists in America,
link |
00:18:03.140
but to the extent that it does.
link |
00:18:04.820
People use the word capitalism in so many different ways.
link |
00:18:08.380
What is capitalism?
link |
00:18:09.820
The literal meaning is private ownership of capital goods,
link |
00:18:13.500
which I favor in most areas.
link |
00:18:15.940
But no, I don't think the private sector
link |
00:18:17.700
should own our F16s or military assets.
link |
00:18:20.840
Government owned water utilities seem to work
link |
00:18:23.860
as well as privately owned water utilities.
link |
00:18:26.820
But with all those qualifications put to the side,
link |
00:18:30.980
business, for the most part,
link |
00:18:33.740
innovates better than government.
link |
00:18:35.280
It is oriented toward consumer services.
link |
00:18:38.120
The biggest businesses tend to pay the highest wages.
link |
00:18:41.260
Business is great at getting things done.
link |
00:18:43.660
USA is fundamentally a nation of business
link |
00:18:46.500
and that makes us a nation of opportunity.
link |
00:18:49.140
So I am indeed mostly a fan.
link |
00:18:51.780
Subject to numerous caveats.
link |
00:18:54.000
What's the con?
link |
00:18:56.300
What are some negative downsides of capitalism
link |
00:19:00.300
in your view or some things that we should be concerned
link |
00:19:03.860
about maybe for longterm impacts of capitalism?
link |
00:19:07.740
Again, capitalism takes a different form in each country.
link |
00:19:10.860
I would say in the United States,
link |
00:19:12.940
our weird blend of whatever you want to call it
link |
00:19:16.120
has had an enduring racial problem from the beginning,
link |
00:19:20.160
has been a force of taking away land
link |
00:19:22.740
from Native Americans and oppressing them
link |
00:19:25.460
pretty much from the beginning.
link |
00:19:30.180
It has done very well by immigrants for the most part.
link |
00:19:35.020
We revel in championitarian creative destruction more.
link |
00:19:38.960
So we don't just prop up national champions forever.
link |
00:19:42.260
And there's a precariousness to life for some people here
link |
00:19:45.440
that is less so say in Germany or the Netherlands.
link |
00:19:48.980
We have weaker communities in some regards
link |
00:19:51.780
than say Northwestern Europe often would.
link |
00:19:54.460
That has pluses and minuses.
link |
00:19:55.860
I think it makes us more creative.
link |
00:19:57.780
It's a better country in which to be a weirdo
link |
00:20:00.420
than say Germany or Denmark.
link |
00:20:02.380
But there is truly, whether from the government
link |
00:20:05.500
or from your private community,
link |
00:20:06.980
there is less social security in some fundamental sense.
link |
00:20:10.060
On the point of weirdo,
link |
00:20:11.500
what, that's kind of a beautiful little statement.
link |
00:20:16.340
What is that?
link |
00:20:19.460
I mean, that seems to be, you know,
link |
00:20:21.460
you could think of a guy like Elon Musk
link |
00:20:23.580
and say that he's a weirdo.
link |
00:20:25.180
Is that the sense in which you're using weirdo
link |
00:20:27.180
like outside of the norm, like breaking conventions?
link |
00:20:30.420
Absolutely.
link |
00:20:31.260
And here that is either acceptable or even admired
link |
00:20:35.340
or to be a loner.
link |
00:20:36.700
And since so many people are outsiders
link |
00:20:39.380
and that we're all immigrants is selecting for people
link |
00:20:41.980
who left something behind,
link |
00:20:43.200
we're willing to leave behind their families,
link |
00:20:45.480
we're willing to undergo a certain brutality
link |
00:20:48.220
of switch in their lives,
link |
00:20:50.760
makes us a nation of weirdos and weirdos are creative.
link |
00:20:55.020
And Denmark is not a nation of weirdos.
link |
00:20:58.060
It's a wonderful place, you know, great for them.
link |
00:21:01.100
Ideally you want part of the world
link |
00:21:02.580
to be full of weirdos and innovating.
link |
00:21:04.460
And the other part of the world to be a little
link |
00:21:06.500
kind of chicken shit, risk averse
link |
00:21:09.660
and enjoy the benefit to the innovation
link |
00:21:12.020
and to give people these smooth lives
link |
00:21:13.980
and six weeks off and free ride.
link |
00:21:16.580
And everyone's like, oh, American way versus European way,
link |
00:21:19.340
but basically they're compliments.
link |
00:21:21.500
Yeah, that's fascinating.
link |
00:21:22.420
I used to have this conversation with my like parents
link |
00:21:25.660
when I was growing up and just others
link |
00:21:27.460
from the immigrant kind of flow.
link |
00:21:29.840
And they use this term, especially in Russian is,
link |
00:21:32.780
you know, to criticize something I was doing,
link |
00:21:36.500
that was suggest, you know, normal people don't do this.
link |
00:21:41.120
And I used to be really offended by that,
link |
00:21:44.500
but, you know, as I got older,
link |
00:21:48.340
I realized that that's a kind of compliment
link |
00:21:51.340
because in the same kind of, I would say,
link |
00:21:56.740
way that you're saying that is the American ideal,
link |
00:21:59.860
because if you want to do anything special or interesting,
link |
00:22:02.760
you don't want to be doing in one particular avenue
link |
00:22:06.340
what normal people do, because that won't be interesting.
link |
00:22:12.380
Russians, I think fit in very well here
link |
00:22:14.860
because the ones who come are weirdos.
link |
00:22:16.780
And there's a very different Russian weirdo tradition
link |
00:22:19.100
like Alyosha, right?
link |
00:22:20.340
And by this card, I miss off.
link |
00:22:21.940
Or Perelman, the mathematician, they're weirdos.
link |
00:22:25.060
And they have their own different kind of status
link |
00:22:27.860
in Soviet Union, Russia, wherever.
link |
00:22:30.740
And when Russians come to America,
link |
00:22:32.380
they stay pretty Russian, but it seems to me a week later,
link |
00:22:35.180
they've somehow adjusted.
link |
00:22:38.020
And the ways in which they might want to be like grumpier
link |
00:22:40.860
than Americans, not smile,
link |
00:22:42.260
think that people who smile are idiots,
link |
00:22:44.200
like they can do that.
link |
00:22:45.220
No one takes that away from them.
link |
00:22:48.300
What are you, on a tiny tangent,
link |
00:22:50.700
I'd love to hear if you have thoughts
link |
00:22:52.220
about Grisha Perelman turning down the Fields Medal.
link |
00:22:57.060
Is that something you admire?
link |
00:22:59.180
Does that make sense to you that somebody,
link |
00:23:02.100
you know, with the structure of Nobel Prizes,
link |
00:23:04.160
of these huge awards, of the reputations,
link |
00:23:06.340
the hierarchy of everyone saying, applauding,
link |
00:23:09.240
how special you are, and here's a person
link |
00:23:12.060
who was doing one of the greatest accomplishments
link |
00:23:14.820
in the history of mathematics.
link |
00:23:16.160
It doesn't want the stupid prize
link |
00:23:17.660
and doesn't want recognition,
link |
00:23:19.380
doesn't want to do interviews,
link |
00:23:20.580
it doesn't want to be famous.
link |
00:23:22.020
What do you make of that?
link |
00:23:24.140
It's great.
link |
00:23:24.980
Look, prizes are corrupting.
link |
00:23:26.880
After scientists win Nobel Prizes,
link |
00:23:28.940
they tend to become less productive.
link |
00:23:31.220
Now, statistically, it's hard to sort out
link |
00:23:32.960
the different effects.
link |
00:23:33.800
There's aggression toward the mean.
link |
00:23:35.340
Does the prize make you too busy?
link |
00:23:36.660
It's a little tricky, but.
link |
00:23:38.060
There's not enough Nobel Prizes either
link |
00:23:39.900
to gather enough data.
link |
00:23:41.780
Right, but I've known a lot of Nobel Prize winners,
link |
00:23:45.260
and it is my sense they become less productive.
link |
00:23:47.780
They repeat more of their older messages,
link |
00:23:49.580
which may be highly socially valuable,
link |
00:23:52.220
but if someone wants to turn their back on that
link |
00:23:54.960
and keep on working, which I assume is what he's doing,
link |
00:23:58.300
that's awesome.
link |
00:23:59.400
I mean, we should respect that.
link |
00:24:01.300
It's like he wins a bigger prize, right?
link |
00:24:02.980
Our extreme respect.
link |
00:24:04.460
Yeah.
link |
00:24:06.560
Wow.
link |
00:24:07.820
Grisha, if you're listening, I need to talk to you soon.
link |
00:24:10.700
Okay.
link |
00:24:11.540
I've been trying to get ahold of him.
link |
00:24:15.140
Okay.
link |
00:24:17.580
Back to capitalism.
link |
00:24:18.460
I gotta ask you, just competition in general,
link |
00:24:20.720
in this world of weirdos,
link |
00:24:22.560
is competition good for the world?
link |
00:24:24.820
This kind of seems to be one of the fundamental engines
link |
00:24:29.940
of capitalism, right?
link |
00:24:31.100
Do you see it as ultimately constructive
link |
00:24:32.860
or destructive for the world?
link |
00:24:34.860
What really matters is how good your legal framework is.
link |
00:24:37.660
So competition within nature for food
link |
00:24:40.820
leads to bloody conflict all the time.
link |
00:24:42.500
The animal world is quite unpleasant, to say the least.
link |
00:24:46.300
If you have something like the rule of law
link |
00:24:49.860
and clearly defined property rights,
link |
00:24:52.060
which are within reason justly allocated,
link |
00:24:56.100
competition probably is gonna work very well.
link |
00:24:58.960
But it's not an unalloyed good thing at all.
link |
00:25:01.460
It can be highly destructive.
link |
00:25:02.900
Military competition, right?
link |
00:25:05.300
Which actually is itself sometimes good,
link |
00:25:07.820
but it's not good per se.
link |
00:25:09.380
What aspects of life do you think
link |
00:25:11.340
we should protect from competition?
link |
00:25:13.820
Is there some, you said like the rule of law,
link |
00:25:16.620
is there some things we should keep away from competition?
link |
00:25:19.780
Well, the fight for territory, most of all, right?
link |
00:25:22.180
So violence, anything that involves
link |
00:25:24.220
like actual physical violence.
link |
00:25:25.780
Right, and it's not that I think
link |
00:25:26.860
the current borders are just.
link |
00:25:28.140
I mean, go talk to Hungarians, Romanians,
link |
00:25:31.860
Serbians, Bosnians, they'll talk your ear off.
link |
00:25:34.500
And some of them are probably right.
link |
00:25:36.720
But at the end of the day,
link |
00:25:37.660
we have some kind of international order.
link |
00:25:40.620
And I would rather we more or less stick with it.
link |
00:25:44.380
If Catalonians wanna leave, they keep up with it,
link |
00:25:46.860
let them go, but.
link |
00:25:48.420
What about a space of like healthcare?
link |
00:25:50.500
This is where you get into a tension of like
link |
00:25:52.660
between capitalism and kind of more,
link |
00:25:56.500
I don't wanna use socialism,
link |
00:25:57.900
but those kinds of policies that are less free market.
link |
00:26:02.620
I think in this country,
link |
00:26:03.460
healthcare should be much more competitive.
link |
00:26:06.020
So you go to hospitals, doctors,
link |
00:26:07.580
they don't treat you like a customer.
link |
00:26:10.020
They treat you like an idiot or like a child
link |
00:26:11.980
or someone with third party payment.
link |
00:26:14.520
And it's a pretty humiliating experience often.
link |
00:26:18.840
Yeah.
link |
00:26:19.680
Do you think a free market in general is possible?
link |
00:26:22.860
Like a pure free market?
link |
00:26:25.160
And is that a good goal to strive for?
link |
00:26:28.260
I don't think the term pure free market's well defined
link |
00:26:31.300
because you need a legal order.
link |
00:26:33.020
Legal order has to make decisions
link |
00:26:35.100
on like what is intellectual property
link |
00:26:37.020
more important than ever.
link |
00:26:38.520
There's no benchmark that like represents
link |
00:26:40.500
the pure free market way of doing things.
link |
00:26:43.800
What will penalties be?
link |
00:26:45.460
How much do we put into law enforcement?
link |
00:26:47.840
No simple answers, but just saying free market
link |
00:26:50.780
doesn't pin down what you're gonna do
link |
00:26:52.380
on those all important questions.
link |
00:26:53.980
So free market is an economics, I guess, idea.
link |
00:26:56.980
So it's not possible for free market to generate the rules
link |
00:27:01.220
that are like emergent, like self governing?
link |
00:27:03.780
It generates a lot of them, right?
link |
00:27:05.320
Through private norms, through trade associations.
link |
00:27:08.140
International trade is mostly done privately and by norms.
link |
00:27:13.140
So it's certainly possible, but at the end of the day,
link |
00:27:16.020
I think you need governments to draw very clear lines
link |
00:27:19.940
to prevent it from turning into mafia run systems.
link |
00:27:24.180
You know, I've been hanging out with other group of weirdos,
link |
00:27:29.340
lately Michael Malice, who espouses to be an anarchist,
link |
00:27:34.760
anarchism, which is like, I think intellectually
link |
00:27:39.440
just a fascinating set of ideas, where taking free market
link |
00:27:46.300
to the full extreme of basically saying
link |
00:27:48.580
there should be no government, what is it?
link |
00:27:54.260
Oversight, I guess, and then everything should be fully,
link |
00:27:57.740
like all the agreements, all the collectives you form
link |
00:28:00.340
should be voluntary, not based on the geographic land
link |
00:28:05.660
you were born on and so on.
link |
00:28:07.460
Do you think that's just a giant mess?
link |
00:28:10.900
Like, do you think it's possible for an anarchist society
link |
00:28:13.620
to work where it's, you know, in a fully distributed way,
link |
00:28:18.940
people agree with each other,
link |
00:28:20.500
not just on financial transactions,
link |
00:28:22.700
but you know, on their personal security,
link |
00:28:28.060
on sort of military type of stuff, on healthcare,
link |
00:28:31.940
on education, all those kinds of things.
link |
00:28:34.100
And where does it break down?
link |
00:28:35.700
Well, I wouldn't press a button to say get rid
link |
00:28:37.660
of our current constitution, which I view is pretty good
link |
00:28:40.540
and quite wise, but I think the deeper point
link |
00:28:43.060
is that all societies are in some regards anarchistic
link |
00:28:47.220
and we should take the anarchists seriously.
link |
00:28:49.100
So globally, there's a kind of anarchy across borders,
link |
00:28:53.580
even within federalistic systems, they're typically complex.
link |
00:28:57.260
There's not a clear transitivity necessarily
link |
00:29:00.340
of who has the final say over what,
link |
00:29:03.140
just the state vis a vis its people.
link |
00:29:05.300
There's not per se a final arbitrator in that regard.
link |
00:29:09.060
So you want a good anarchy rather than a bad anarchy.
link |
00:29:13.060
You wanna squish your anarchy into the right corners.
link |
00:29:15.980
And I don't think there's a theoretical answer
link |
00:29:18.420
how to do it, but you start with a country,
link |
00:29:20.660
like is it working well enough now?
link |
00:29:23.540
This country, you'd say mostly,
link |
00:29:25.740
you'd certainly wanna make a lot of improvements.
link |
00:29:28.220
And that's why I don't wanna press that
link |
00:29:29.700
get rid of the constitution button,
link |
00:29:31.660
but to just dump on the anarchists is to miss the point.
link |
00:29:34.060
Always try to learn from any opinion.
link |
00:29:37.500
What in it is true?
link |
00:29:39.100
I'm just like marveling at the poetry
link |
00:29:42.900
of saying that we should squish our anarchy
link |
00:29:45.580
into the right corners of it.
link |
00:29:48.380
Okay, I gotta ask, I've been talking with,
link |
00:29:53.940
since we're doing a whirlwind introduction
link |
00:29:55.940
to all of economics,
link |
00:29:57.420
I've been talking to a few objectivists recently
link |
00:30:00.100
and just, Ayn Rand comes up as a person,
link |
00:30:04.340
as a philosopher throughout many conversations.
link |
00:30:07.060
A lot of people really despise her.
link |
00:30:09.180
A lot of people really love her.
link |
00:30:11.140
It's always weird to me when somebody arouses a philosophy
link |
00:30:14.940
or a human being arouses that much emotion
link |
00:30:16.780
in either direction, does she make,
link |
00:30:20.140
do you understand, first of all, that level of emotion
link |
00:30:22.780
and what are your thoughts about Ayn Rand
link |
00:30:25.060
and her philosophy of objectivism?
link |
00:30:26.700
Is it useful at all to think about this kind of formulation
link |
00:30:31.140
of a rational self interest,
link |
00:30:34.860
if I could put it in those words,
link |
00:30:36.700
or I guess more negatively the selfishness
link |
00:30:43.100
or she would put, I guess, the virtue of selfishness.
link |
00:30:46.540
Ayn Rand was a big influence on me growing up.
link |
00:30:49.300
The book that really mattered for me was
link |
00:30:50.860
Capitalism, The Unknown Ideal.
link |
00:30:53.340
The notion that wealth creates opportunity
link |
00:30:56.220
and good lives and wealth is something we ought to valorize
link |
00:30:59.860
and give very high status.
link |
00:31:01.340
It's one of her key ideas.
link |
00:31:02.860
I think it's completely correct.
link |
00:31:04.500
I think she has the most profound
link |
00:31:06.100
and articulate statement of that idea.
link |
00:31:08.780
That said, as a philosopher,
link |
00:31:10.780
I disagree with her on most things.
link |
00:31:12.980
And I did, even like as a boy, when I was reading her,
link |
00:31:15.700
I read Plato before Ayn Rand.
link |
00:31:17.820
And in a Socratic dialogue,
link |
00:31:19.140
there's all these different points of view
link |
00:31:20.380
being thrown around.
link |
00:31:22.100
And whomever it is you agree with,
link |
00:31:24.100
you understand the wisdom is in the coming together
link |
00:31:27.020
of the different points of view.
link |
00:31:28.700
And she doesn't have that.
link |
00:31:29.780
So altruism can be wonderful in my view.
link |
00:31:32.980
Humans are not actually that rational.
link |
00:31:35.340
Self interest is often poorly defined.
link |
00:31:38.140
To pound the table and say existence exists.
link |
00:31:41.140
I wouldn't say I disagree,
link |
00:31:42.900
but I'm not sure that it's a very meaningful statement.
link |
00:31:46.460
I think the secret to Ayn Rand is that she was Russian.
link |
00:31:49.220
I'd love to have her on my podcast if she was still alive.
link |
00:31:52.020
I'd only ask her about Russia,
link |
00:31:53.820
which she mostly never talked about
link |
00:31:56.060
after writing We the Living.
link |
00:31:57.860
And she is much more Russian than she seems at first,
link |
00:32:01.580
even like purging people from the objectivist circles.
link |
00:32:04.340
It's like how Russians, especially female Russians,
link |
00:32:07.380
so often purge their friends.
link |
00:32:09.300
It's weird, all the parallels.
link |
00:32:11.540
So you're saying, so yes,
link |
00:32:13.460
so assuming she's still not around,
link |
00:32:17.740
but if she is and she comes onto your podcast,
link |
00:32:20.580
can you dig into that a little bit?
link |
00:32:21.940
Do you mean like her personal demons
link |
00:32:26.020
around the social and economic Russia of the time,
link |
00:32:31.940
when she escaped?
link |
00:32:32.860
The traumas she suffered there,
link |
00:32:34.820
what she really likes in the music and literature and why.
link |
00:32:37.540
Music and literature, huh?
link |
00:32:38.580
And getting deeply into that,
link |
00:32:40.220
her view of relations between the sexes and Russia,
link |
00:32:42.860
how it differs from America,
link |
00:32:44.980
why she still carries through the old Russian vision
link |
00:32:48.260
in her fiction, this extreme sexual dimorphism,
link |
00:32:51.500
but with also very strong women,
link |
00:32:53.860
to me is a uniquely, at least Eastern European vision,
link |
00:32:57.860
mostly Russian, I would say.
link |
00:33:00.380
And that's in her, that's her actual real philosophy,
link |
00:33:03.140
not this table bounding existence exists.
link |
00:33:06.060
And that's not talked about enough.
link |
00:33:07.820
She's a Russian philosopher.
link |
00:33:09.260
Or Soviet, whatever you wanna call it.
link |
00:33:12.380
And if she wasn't so certain,
link |
00:33:14.700
she could have been a Dostoevsky where it's not,
link |
00:33:17.340
that certainty is almost the thing
link |
00:33:19.060
that brings out the adoration of millions,
link |
00:33:23.340
but also the hatred of millions.
link |
00:33:25.260
She became a cult figure in a somewhat Russian like manner.
link |
00:33:29.020
Yeah.
link |
00:33:29.980
Yeah.
link |
00:33:30.820
It is what it is.
link |
00:33:32.140
But I love the idea that, again,
link |
00:33:34.580
you're just dropping bombs that are poetic,
link |
00:33:37.100
that the wisdom is in the coming together of ideas.
link |
00:33:40.940
It's kind of interesting to think
link |
00:33:42.300
that no one human possesses wisdom.
link |
00:33:46.780
No one idea is the wisdom.
link |
00:33:49.380
That the coming together is the wisdom.
link |
00:33:52.180
Like in my view, Boswell's Life of Johnson,
link |
00:33:54.620
18th century British biography.
link |
00:33:56.900
It's in essence a coauthored work, Boswell and Johnson.
link |
00:33:59.900
It's one of the greatest philosophy books ever,
link |
00:34:02.660
though it is commonly regarded as a biography.
link |
00:34:05.180
John Stuart Mill, who in a sense
link |
00:34:07.180
was coauthoring with Harriet Taylor,
link |
00:34:10.140
better philosopher than is realized,
link |
00:34:12.060
though he's rated very, very highly.
link |
00:34:14.140
Plato slash Socrates, a lot of the greatest works
link |
00:34:18.020
are in a kind of dialogue form.
link |
00:34:19.860
Curtis Faust would be another example.
link |
00:34:23.060
It's very much a dialogue.
link |
00:34:24.940
And yes, it's drama, but it's also a philosophy.
link |
00:34:27.340
Shakespeare, maybe the wisest thinker of them all.
link |
00:34:31.900
In your book, Big Business, speaking of Ayn Rand,
link |
00:34:35.380
Big Business, A Love Letter to an American Antihero,
link |
00:34:38.860
you make the case for the benefit
link |
00:34:41.460
that large businesses bring to society.
link |
00:34:43.500
Can you explain?
link |
00:34:45.140
If you look at, say, the pandemic,
link |
00:34:46.900
which has been a catastrophic event, right,
link |
00:34:49.060
for many reasons, but who is it that saved us?
link |
00:34:52.620
So Amazon has done remarkably well.
link |
00:34:56.180
They upped their delivery game more or less overnight
link |
00:34:59.420
with very few hitches.
link |
00:35:00.980
I've ordered hundreds of Amazon packages,
link |
00:35:03.660
direct delivery food, whether it's DoorDash or Uber Eats,
link |
00:35:07.380
or using Whole Foods through Amazon shipping.
link |
00:35:10.100
Again, it's gone remarkably well.
link |
00:35:12.260
Switching over our entire higher educational system,
link |
00:35:15.780
basically within two weeks, to Zoom.
link |
00:35:18.140
Zoom did it.
link |
00:35:19.100
I mean, I've had a Zoom outage,
link |
00:35:21.260
but their performance rate has been remarkably high.
link |
00:35:24.820
So if you just look at resources, competence, incentives,
link |
00:35:29.420
who's been the star performers, the NBA even,
link |
00:35:31.900
just canceling the season as early as they did,
link |
00:35:34.460
sending a message like, hey, people, this is real,
link |
00:35:37.580
and then pulling off the bubble
link |
00:35:39.580
with not a single found case of COVID
link |
00:35:41.700
and having all the testing set up in advance.
link |
00:35:45.060
Big business has done very well lately,
link |
00:35:47.820
and throughout the broader course of American history,
link |
00:35:50.700
in my view, has mostly been a hero.
link |
00:35:53.900
Can we engage in a kind of therapy session?
link |
00:35:58.540
I'm often troubled by the negativity towards big business,
link |
00:36:04.180
and I wonder if you could help figure out
link |
00:36:07.260
how we remove that or maybe first psychoanalyze it
link |
00:36:11.380
and then how we remove it.
link |
00:36:12.980
It feels like once we've gotten wifi on flights,
link |
00:36:20.620
on airplane flights, people started complaining
link |
00:36:24.860
about how shady the connection is, right?
link |
00:36:27.180
They take it for granted immediately
link |
00:36:29.540
and then start complaining about little details.
link |
00:36:31.900
Another example that's closer to,
link |
00:36:36.380
especially as an aspiring entrepreneur,
link |
00:36:39.740
is closer to the things I'm thinking about
link |
00:36:41.980
is Jack Dorsey with Twitter.
link |
00:36:45.260
To me, Twitter has enabled
link |
00:36:46.940
an incredible platform of communication,
link |
00:36:50.620
and yet the biggest thing that people talk about
link |
00:36:53.420
is not how incredible this platform is.
link |
00:36:58.460
They essentially use the platform
link |
00:37:00.660
to complain about the censorship of a few individuals
link |
00:37:04.620
as opposed to how amazing it is.
link |
00:37:06.260
Now, you should talk about how shady the wifi is
link |
00:37:09.420
and how censorship or the removal of Donald Trump
link |
00:37:12.460
from the platform is a bad thing,
link |
00:37:13.820
but it feels like we don't talk about the positive impacts
link |
00:37:17.740
at scale of these technologies.
link |
00:37:20.420
Can you explain why and is there a way to fix it?
link |
00:37:23.940
I don't know if we can fix it.
link |
00:37:25.340
I think we are beings of high neuroticism for the most part
link |
00:37:29.300
as a personality trait.
link |
00:37:30.740
Not everyone, but most people.
link |
00:37:33.460
And as a compliment to that,
link |
00:37:34.780
if someone says 10 nice things about you and one insult,
link |
00:37:38.140
you're more bothered by the insult
link |
00:37:39.540
than you're pleased by the nice things,
link |
00:37:41.140
especially if the insult is somewhat true.
link |
00:37:43.820
So you have these media, these vehicles,
link |
00:37:46.620
Twitter is one you mentioned,
link |
00:37:48.420
where there's all kinds of messages going back and forth,
link |
00:37:50.580
and you're really bugged by the messages you don't like.
link |
00:37:53.580
Most people are neurotic to begin with.
link |
00:37:56.180
It's not only taken out on big business, to be clear.
link |
00:37:58.820
So Congress catches a lot of grief
link |
00:38:01.580
and some of it they deserve, yes.
link |
00:38:05.260
Religion is not attacked the same way,
link |
00:38:07.380
but religiosity is declining.
link |
00:38:09.820
If you poll people, the military still polls quite well,
link |
00:38:14.580
but people are very disillusioned with many things.
link |
00:38:17.020
And the Martin Gury thesis that because of the internet,
link |
00:38:19.740
you just see more of things.
link |
00:38:21.580
And the more you see of something,
link |
00:38:22.860
whether it's good, bad, or in between,
link |
00:38:24.940
the more you will find to complain about,
link |
00:38:26.740
I suspect is the fundamental mechanism here.
link |
00:38:30.460
I mean, look at Clubhouse, right?
link |
00:38:32.660
To me, it's a great service, may or may not be like my thing,
link |
00:38:35.780
but gives people this opportunity.
link |
00:38:37.380
No one makes you go on it.
link |
00:38:39.100
And all these media articles like,
link |
00:38:40.620
oh, is Clubhouse gonna wreck things?
link |
00:38:42.740
Are they gonna break things?
link |
00:38:44.260
New York Times is complaining.
link |
00:38:45.740
Of course, it's their competitor as well.
link |
00:38:48.020
I'm like, give these people a chance, talk it up.
link |
00:38:50.820
You may or may not like it.
link |
00:38:52.700
Let's praise the people who are getting something done.
link |
00:38:55.580
Very Ayn Randian point.
link |
00:38:57.780
As an economic thinker, as a writer, as a podcaster,
link |
00:39:01.460
what do you think about Clubhouse?
link |
00:39:03.980
What do you think about...
link |
00:39:06.300
Okay, let me just throw my feeling about it.
link |
00:39:09.780
I used to use Discord, which is another service
link |
00:39:12.380
where people use voice.
link |
00:39:13.620
So the only thing you do is just hear each other.
link |
00:39:16.420
There's no face, you just see a little icon.
link |
00:39:19.060
That's the essential element of Clubhouse.
link |
00:39:23.700
And there's an intimacy to voice only communication.
link |
00:39:26.540
That's hard.
link |
00:39:27.660
That didn't make sense to me, but it was just what it is,
link |
00:39:30.860
which feels like something that won't last
link |
00:39:33.420
for some reason, maybe it's the cynical view.
link |
00:39:36.260
But what's your sense about the intimacy
link |
00:39:40.900
of what's happening right now with Clubhouse?
link |
00:39:43.420
I've greatly enjoyed what I've done,
link |
00:39:45.580
but I'm not sure it's for me in the long run
link |
00:39:47.380
for two reasons.
link |
00:39:48.740
First, if you compare it to doing a podcast,
link |
00:39:52.500
podcasting has greater reach than Clubhouse.
link |
00:39:55.220
So I would rather put time into my podcast.
link |
00:39:58.340
But then also my core asset, so to speak,
link |
00:40:02.820
is I'm a very fast reader.
link |
00:40:04.980
So audio per se is not necessarily to my advantage.
link |
00:40:08.220
I don't speak or listen faster than other people.
link |
00:40:10.860
In fact, I'm a slower listener because I like 1.0,
link |
00:40:13.620
not 1.5X.
link |
00:40:15.500
So I should spend less time on audio
link |
00:40:17.260
and more time reading and writing.
link |
00:40:18.820
Yeah, it's interesting because you mentioned podcasts
link |
00:40:21.860
and audio books, the podcasts are recorded
link |
00:40:28.660
and so I can skip things, like I can skip commercials,
link |
00:40:32.100
or I can skip parts where it's like,
link |
00:40:34.060
ugh, this part is boring.
link |
00:40:36.220
With live conversations, especially when,
link |
00:40:40.140
there's a magic to the fact when you have a lot of people
link |
00:40:42.540
participating in that conversation,
link |
00:40:44.820
but some people are like, ugh, this topic,
link |
00:40:47.980
they're going into this thing and you can't skip it
link |
00:40:50.100
or you can't fast forward, you can go 1.5X or 2X,
link |
00:40:53.980
you can't speed it up.
link |
00:40:56.100
Nevertheless, there's a tension between that,
link |
00:40:58.540
so that's the productivity aspect,
link |
00:41:00.540
with the actual magic of live communication,
link |
00:41:04.620
where anything can happen, where Elon Musk
link |
00:41:07.420
can ask the CEO of Robinhood, Vlad, about like,
link |
00:41:11.340
hey, somebody holding a gun to your head,
link |
00:41:13.300
there's something shady going on, the magic of that.
link |
00:41:16.100
That's also my criticism of like,
link |
00:41:18.300
there's been a recent conversation with Bill Gates
link |
00:41:20.900
that he won a platform and had a regular interview
link |
00:41:26.700
on the platform without allowing the possibility
link |
00:41:29.540
of the magic of the chaos.
link |
00:41:32.460
So I'm not exactly sure, it's probably not the right
link |
00:41:36.180
platform for you and for many other people
link |
00:41:38.380
who are exceptionally productive in other places,
link |
00:41:40.860
but there's still nevertheless a magic to the chaos
link |
00:41:43.420
that can be created with live conversation
link |
00:41:45.540
that gives me pause.
link |
00:41:47.860
Maybe what it's perfect for is the tribute.
link |
00:41:50.140
So they had an episode recently that I didn't hear,
link |
00:41:52.520
but I heard it was wonderful.
link |
00:41:54.040
It was anecdotes about Steve Jobs.
link |
00:41:56.380
That you can't do one to one, right?
link |
00:41:58.040
And you don't want control.
link |
00:41:59.460
You want different people appearing and stepping up
link |
00:42:02.020
and saying their bit.
link |
00:42:03.780
And Clubhouse is 110% perfect for that.
link |
00:42:07.740
The tribute.
link |
00:42:08.900
I love that, the tribute.
link |
00:42:10.500
But there's also the possibility,
link |
00:42:12.580
I think there was a time when somebody arranged
link |
00:42:15.740
a conversation with Steve Jobs and Bill Gates on stage.
link |
00:42:18.900
I remember that happened a long time ago.
link |
00:42:22.540
And it was very formal.
link |
00:42:26.580
It could have probably gone better,
link |
00:42:27.900
but it was still magical to have these people
link |
00:42:30.060
that obviously had a bunch of tension
link |
00:42:32.220
throughout their history.
link |
00:42:35.420
It's so frictionless to have two major figures
link |
00:42:39.460
in world history just jump on a Clubhouse stage.
link |
00:42:42.580
Putin and Elon Musk.
link |
00:42:43.780
Putin and Elon Musk.
link |
00:42:45.660
And that's exactly it.
link |
00:42:47.180
So there's a language barrier there.
link |
00:42:48.820
There's also the problem that in particular,
link |
00:42:52.860
it's like Biden would have a similar problem.
link |
00:42:55.900
It's like they're just not into a new technology.
link |
00:42:58.340
So it's very hard to catch the Kremlin up to,
link |
00:43:01.580
first of all, Twitter,
link |
00:43:03.740
but to catch them up to Clubhouse,
link |
00:43:05.160
you have to have the,
link |
00:43:07.260
Elon Musk has a sense of the internet,
link |
00:43:08.820
the humor, the memes, and all that kind of stuff
link |
00:43:10.860
that you have to have in order to use a new app
link |
00:43:14.900
and figure out the timing, the beat,
link |
00:43:16.900
what is this thing about?
link |
00:43:19.140
So that's the challenge there.
link |
00:43:20.540
But that's exactly it.
link |
00:43:21.620
That magic of have two big personalities just show up.
link |
00:43:27.900
And I wonder if it's just the temporary thing
link |
00:43:30.660
that we're going through with the pandemic
link |
00:43:32.340
where people are just lonely
link |
00:43:35.620
and they're seeking for that human connection
link |
00:43:37.500
that we usually get elsewhere through our work.
link |
00:43:40.540
But they'll stay lonely, in my opinion.
link |
00:43:42.620
You think so? I do.
link |
00:43:44.560
So it is a pandemic thing, but I think it will persist.
link |
00:43:48.140
And the idea of wanting to be connected
link |
00:43:49.900
to more of the world, Clubhouse will still offer that.
link |
00:43:53.500
And all the mental health issues out there,
link |
00:43:56.140
a lot of people have broken ties
link |
00:43:58.700
and they will still be lonely post vaccines.
link |
00:44:02.300
Yeah, I, from an artificial intelligence perspective,
link |
00:44:06.940
have a sense that there is like a deep loneliness
link |
00:44:10.720
in the world, that all of us are really lonely.
link |
00:44:13.140
Like we don't even acknowledge it.
link |
00:44:14.460
Even people in happy relationships,
link |
00:44:16.660
it feels like there's like an iceberg of loneliness
link |
00:44:19.140
in all of us, like seeking to be understood,
link |
00:44:22.700
like deeply understood, understanding us,
link |
00:44:24.980
like having somebody with whom you can have
link |
00:44:27.860
a deep interaction enough to where you can,
link |
00:44:31.540
they can help you to understand yourself
link |
00:44:34.100
and they also understand you.
link |
00:44:36.460
Like I have a sense that artificial intelligence systems
link |
00:44:38.820
can provide that as well, but humans,
link |
00:44:42.100
I think crave that from other humans
link |
00:44:44.420
in ways that we perhaps don't acknowledge.
link |
00:44:46.460
And I have a hope that technology will enable that
link |
00:44:48.980
more and more, like Clubhouse is an example
link |
00:44:50.900
that allows that.
link |
00:44:52.260
Are touring bots gonna out compete Clubhouse?
link |
00:44:54.940
Like why not sort of program your own session?
link |
00:44:57.560
You'll just talk into your device
link |
00:44:59.900
and say here's the kind of conversation I want
link |
00:45:02.300
and it will create the characters for you.
link |
00:45:04.580
And it may not be as good as Elon and Vladimir Putin,
link |
00:45:07.080
but it will be better than ordinary Clubhouse.
link |
00:45:09.620
Yeah, and one of the things that's missing,
link |
00:45:11.680
it's not just conversation, it's memory.
link |
00:45:14.940
So longterm memories, what current AI systems don't have
link |
00:45:19.100
is sharing experience together.
link |
00:45:21.200
Forget the words, it's like sharing the highs
link |
00:45:24.020
and the lows of life together
link |
00:45:26.300
and the systems around us remembering that.
link |
00:45:29.460
Remembering we've been through that.
link |
00:45:31.300
Like that's the thing that creates
link |
00:45:32.900
really close relationships, is going through some shit.
link |
00:45:35.460
Like struggle.
link |
00:45:37.660
If you survive together, there's something really difficult
link |
00:45:41.020
that bonds you with other humans.
link |
00:45:42.820
And this is related to immigration and the American dream.
link |
00:45:46.500
In what way?
link |
00:45:47.340
The people who have come to this country,
link |
00:45:48.940
however weird and different they may be,
link |
00:45:51.860
they or their ancestors at some point
link |
00:45:53.740
probably have shared this thing.
link |
00:45:58.140
Right, US is not gonna split up.
link |
00:46:00.100
It may get more screwed up as a country,
link |
00:46:02.380
but Texas and California are not gonna break off.
link |
00:46:05.500
I mean, they're big enough where they could do it,
link |
00:46:07.280
but it's just never gonna happen.
link |
00:46:08.920
We've been through too much together.
link |
00:46:10.380
Yeah.
link |
00:46:11.220
Yeah, that's a hopeful message.
link |
00:46:14.060
Do you think, some people have talked to Eric Weinstein,
link |
00:46:17.020
you've talked to Eric Weinstein.
link |
00:46:20.060
He has a sense that growth,
link |
00:46:23.460
like the entirety of the American system
link |
00:46:26.200
is based on the assumption that we're gonna grow forever,
link |
00:46:28.820
that the economy's gonna grow forever.
link |
00:46:30.980
Do you think economic growth will continue indefinitely?
link |
00:46:35.780
Or will we stagnate?
link |
00:46:37.180
I've long been in agreement with Eric, Peter Thiel,
link |
00:46:40.940
Robert Gordon and others, that growth has slowed down.
link |
00:46:45.300
I argued that in my book,
link |
00:46:46.540
The Great Stagnation, appropriately titled.
link |
00:46:49.620
But the last two years, I've become much more optimistic.
link |
00:46:52.180
I've seen a lot of breakthroughs
link |
00:46:53.900
in green energy and battery technology.
link |
00:46:56.780
mRNA vaccines and medicine is a big deal already.
link |
00:47:00.860
It will repair our GDP
link |
00:47:02.380
and save millions of lives around the world.
link |
00:47:05.180
There's an anti malaria vaccine
link |
00:47:07.100
that's now in stage three trial, it probably works.
link |
00:47:10.100
CRISPR to defeat sickle cell anemia.
link |
00:47:13.660
Just space, area after area after area,
link |
00:47:16.540
there's suddenly the surge of breakthroughs.
link |
00:47:18.780
I would say many of them rooted in superior computation
link |
00:47:22.060
and ultimately Moore's law
link |
00:47:23.500
and access to those computational abilities.
link |
00:47:26.580
So I'm much more optimistic than say,
link |
00:47:28.460
the last time I spoke to Eric.
link |
00:47:30.420
I don't know, he moves all the time in his views.
link |
00:47:32.900
I don't know where he's going.
link |
00:47:34.220
His views, I don't know where he's at now.
link |
00:47:35.940
He's not at, he hasn't gained, that's really interesting.
link |
00:47:38.900
So your little drop of optimism comes from like,
link |
00:47:44.180
there might be a fundamental shift
link |
00:47:46.180
in the kind of things that computation has unlocked for us
link |
00:47:49.620
in terms of like, it could be a wellspring of innovation
link |
00:47:52.860
that enables growth for a long time to come.
link |
00:47:55.540
Like Eric has not quite connected
link |
00:47:59.420
to the computation aspect yet
link |
00:48:01.620
to where it could be a wellspring of innovation.
link |
00:48:04.340
But you're very close to it in your own work.
link |
00:48:06.180
I don't have to tell you that.
link |
00:48:07.740
The work you're doing would not have been possible
link |
00:48:10.020
not very long ago.
link |
00:48:11.300
But the question is,
link |
00:48:12.140
how much does that work enable continued growth
link |
00:48:14.820
for decades to come?
link |
00:48:16.180
For all their problems,
link |
00:48:17.660
some version of driverless vehicles will be a thing.
link |
00:48:20.700
I'm not sure when, you know much better than I do.
link |
00:48:23.380
Maybe only partially, but that too will be a big deal.
link |
00:48:26.700
Well, one of the open questions
link |
00:48:28.220
that sort of the Peter Thiel School area of ideas
link |
00:48:32.940
is how much can be converted to technology?
link |
00:48:36.180
How much, how many parts of our lives
link |
00:48:38.740
can technology integrate and then innovate?
link |
00:48:40.740
Like can it replace healthcare?
link |
00:48:43.460
Can it replace the legal system?
link |
00:48:46.420
Can it replace government?
link |
00:48:47.740
Not replace, but like, you know, make it digital
link |
00:48:52.740
and thereby enable computation to improve it, right?
link |
00:48:57.460
That's the open question,
link |
00:48:58.820
because many aspects of our lives
link |
00:49:00.740
are still not really that digitized.
link |
00:49:06.020
There was a New York Times symposium in April,
link |
00:49:08.580
which is not long ago.
link |
00:49:09.740
And they asked the so called experts,
link |
00:49:11.940
when are we gonna get vaccines?
link |
00:49:13.620
And the most optimistic answer was in four years.
link |
00:49:17.700
And obviously we beat that by a long mile.
link |
00:49:21.260
So I think people still haven't woken up.
link |
00:49:23.140
You mentioned my tiny drop of optimism,
link |
00:49:25.020
but it's a big drop of optimism.
link |
00:49:27.860
Is it a waterfall yet?
link |
00:49:28.940
I mean, is it just?
link |
00:49:30.740
Well, here's my pessimism.
link |
00:49:32.380
Whenever there are major new technologies,
link |
00:49:34.460
they also tend to be used for violence
link |
00:49:36.340
directly or indirectly, radio, Hitler.
link |
00:49:39.220
Not that he hit people over the head with radios,
link |
00:49:41.100
but it enabled the rise of various dictators.
link |
00:49:44.700
So the new technologies now, whatever exactly they may be,
link |
00:49:48.620
they're gonna cause a lot of trouble.
link |
00:49:50.500
And that's my pessimism.
link |
00:49:51.660
Not that I think they're all gonna slow to a trickle.
link |
00:49:54.740
When was the stagnation book?
link |
00:49:56.660
2011.
link |
00:49:57.860
2011.
link |
00:49:58.740
Yes.
link |
00:49:59.900
It was the first of the stagnation books, in fact.
link |
00:50:03.060
It's very interesting.
link |
00:50:05.220
But even then I said, this is temporary.
link |
00:50:07.700
And I was predicting it would be gone
link |
00:50:09.620
in about 20 years time.
link |
00:50:12.460
I'm not sure that's exactly the right prediction,
link |
00:50:14.540
like 2030, but I think we're actually gonna beat that.
link |
00:50:19.140
So you think United States might still be
link |
00:50:21.020
on top of the world for the rest of the century
link |
00:50:22.980
in terms of its economic growth,
link |
00:50:26.260
impact on the world, scientific innovation,
link |
00:50:28.460
all those kinds of things?
link |
00:50:29.940
That's too long to predict,
link |
00:50:31.460
but I'm bullish on America in general.
link |
00:50:35.060
Got it.
link |
00:50:36.740
Speaking of being bullish on America,
link |
00:50:38.900
the opposite of that is,
link |
00:50:43.420
we talked about capitalism,
link |
00:50:44.420
we talked about Iran and her Russian roots.
link |
00:50:47.900
What do you think about communism?
link |
00:50:51.340
Why doesn't it work?
link |
00:50:53.240
Is it the implementation?
link |
00:50:58.180
Is there anything about its ideas that you find compelling?
link |
00:51:01.540
Or is it just a fundamentally flawed system?
link |
00:51:06.220
Well, communism is like capitalism.
link |
00:51:08.020
The words mean many things to different people.
link |
00:51:10.740
You could argue my life as a tenured professor
link |
00:51:12.860
comes closer to communism than anything
link |
00:51:15.300
the human race has seen.
link |
00:51:16.460
And I would argue it works pretty well.
link |
00:51:19.220
But look, if you mean the Soviet Union,
link |
00:51:21.740
it devolved pretty quickly
link |
00:51:23.700
to a kind of decentralized set of incentives
link |
00:51:27.500
that were destructive rather than value maximizing.
link |
00:51:30.620
It wasn't even central planning, much less communism.
link |
00:51:34.300
So Paul Craig Roberts and Polanyi were correct
link |
00:51:37.140
in their descriptions of the Soviet system.
link |
00:51:39.680
Think of it as weird mixes of barter
link |
00:51:41.580
and malfunctioning incentives
link |
00:51:44.100
and being very good at a whole bunch of things,
link |
00:51:47.100
but in terms of progress, innovation,
link |
00:51:48.860
and consumer goods, it really being quite a failure.
link |
00:51:54.460
And now I wouldn't call that communism,
link |
00:51:56.380
but that's what I think of the system the Soviets had.
link |
00:52:00.420
And it required an ever increasing pile of lies
link |
00:52:04.840
that both alienated people, but created an elite
link |
00:52:07.740
that by the end of the thing
link |
00:52:08.940
no longer believed in the system itself,
link |
00:52:12.300
or even thought they were doing better by being crooks
link |
00:52:15.400
than by just say moving to Switzerland
link |
00:52:17.000
and being an upper middle class individual,
link |
00:52:18.740
like you would have a higher standard of living
link |
00:52:20.740
by Gorbachev's time, not Gorbachev,
link |
00:52:23.060
but if you're a number 30 in the hierarchy,
link |
00:52:25.340
you're better off as a middle class person in Switzerland.
link |
00:52:27.900
And that, of course, did not prove sustainable.
link |
00:52:31.180
And so it's, what is it, a momentum of bureaucracy
link |
00:52:33.620
or something like that, it just builds up
link |
00:52:34.940
where you lose control of the original vision,
link |
00:52:37.700
and that naturally happens, it's just people.
link |
00:52:40.180
And you can't use normal profit and loss
link |
00:52:41.980
and price incentives, so you get all prices
link |
00:52:44.420
or most prices set too low, right?
link |
00:52:46.780
Shortages everywhere, people trade favors,
link |
00:52:49.580
you have this culture of bartered bribes,
link |
00:52:52.100
sexual favors or family friends,
link |
00:52:55.380
and you get more and more of that,
link |
00:52:57.060
and you over time lose more and more of the information
link |
00:52:59.780
and the prices and quantities and practices
link |
00:53:03.180
and norms you had, and that sort of slowly decays,
link |
00:53:06.220
and then by the end no one is believing in it.
link |
00:53:09.300
That would be my take, but again, you're the expert here.
link |
00:53:12.220
The Russian scholar, well, I'm perhaps no more
link |
00:53:17.620
an expert than Ayn Rand, it's more personal
link |
00:53:20.580
than it is scholarly or historic.
link |
00:53:25.060
So Stalin held power for 30 years,
link |
00:53:29.060
Vladimir Putin has held power for 21 years,
link |
00:53:34.340
where you could argue he took a little break.
link |
00:53:36.820
But not much, he was still holding power, I think.
link |
00:53:39.980
And it's still possible now with the new constitution
link |
00:53:44.900
that he could hold power from longer than Stalin,
link |
00:53:47.500
longer than 30 years.
link |
00:53:48.860
What do you think about the man,
link |
00:53:51.380
the state of affairs in Russia,
link |
00:53:54.780
in general, the system they have there?
link |
00:53:57.900
Is there something interesting to you
link |
00:53:59.260
as an economist, as a human being, about Russia?
link |
00:54:02.300
Everything is interesting.
link |
00:54:03.420
I mean, here would be part of my take.
link |
00:54:05.980
As you know, the Russian economy starting, what, 1999, 2000,
link |
00:54:11.060
has really quite a few years of super excellent growth.
link |
00:54:15.060
And Putin is still riding on that.
link |
00:54:17.140
It more or less coincides with his rise
link |
00:54:20.580
as the truly focal figure on the scene.
link |
00:54:24.220
Since then, pretty recently, they've had a bunch of years
link |
00:54:26.460
of negative four to 5% growth in a row, which is terrible.
link |
00:54:31.580
The economy is way too dependent on fossil fuels,
link |
00:54:35.180
but the structural problem is this.
link |
00:54:37.660
You need a concordance across economic power,
link |
00:54:40.860
social power, political power.
link |
00:54:43.140
They don't have to be allocated identically,
link |
00:54:45.500
but they have to be allocated consistently.
link |
00:54:49.340
And the Russian system under Putin,
link |
00:54:51.100
from almost the beginning, has never been able to have that,
link |
00:54:55.100
that ultimately his incentives are to steer the system
link |
00:54:58.460
where the economic power is in a small number of hands
link |
00:55:01.660
in a non diversified way.
link |
00:55:03.900
The system won't deliver sustainable gains
link |
00:55:06.540
in living standards anymore ever the way it's set up now.
link |
00:55:11.140
Though if fossil fuel prices go up,
link |
00:55:13.140
they'll have some good years for sure.
link |
00:55:15.780
And that is really quite structural, what has gone wrong.
link |
00:55:20.340
And then on top of that, you can have an opinion of Putin,
link |
00:55:23.380
but you've got to start with those structural problems.
link |
00:55:25.660
And that's why it's just not going to work.
link |
00:55:28.700
But he had all those good years in the beginning.
link |
00:55:30.780
So the number of Russians, say, who live here
link |
00:55:33.420
or in Russia, who love Putin and it's sincere,
link |
00:55:36.540
they're not just afraid of being dragged away,
link |
00:55:39.260
like that's a real phenomenon.
link |
00:55:41.460
Yeah, I'm really torn on Putin's approval rating,
link |
00:55:45.220
real approval rating seems to be very high.
link |
00:55:49.020
And I'm torn in whether that has to do with the fact
link |
00:55:54.020
that there is control of the press,
link |
00:55:58.180
or if it's, which is the people I talked to
link |
00:56:01.020
who are in Russia, family and so on, a genuine love
link |
00:56:04.940
of Putin, appreciation of what Putin has done
link |
00:56:07.860
and is going to do with Russia.
link |
00:56:10.180
And a lot of that would go away
link |
00:56:11.620
if the press were freer, I think.
link |
00:56:13.140
Yes, well, Singapore realizes this,
link |
00:56:15.940
anyone discussed by the press, no matter who they are,
link |
00:56:18.580
people in Singapore have done a great job.
link |
00:56:20.620
Yes.
link |
00:56:22.180
But if you're discussed by the press, you don't look good.
link |
00:56:24.700
Tech company executives are learning this, right?
link |
00:56:27.140
It's just like a rule.
link |
00:56:28.380
So in that sense, I think the rating is artificially high,
link |
00:56:32.220
but I don't by any means think it's all insincere,
link |
00:56:36.060
but that high popularity I view as bearish for Russia.
link |
00:56:39.460
I would feel better about the country
link |
00:56:40.900
if people were more pissed off at him.
link |
00:56:43.060
Yeah, that's right.
link |
00:56:44.180
It's nice to see free speech, even if it's full of hate.
link |
00:56:49.620
I am also troubled on the scientific side
link |
00:56:52.860
and entrepreneurial side, it seems difficult
link |
00:56:55.420
to be an entrepreneur in Russia.
link |
00:56:58.500
Like it's not even in terms of rules,
link |
00:57:03.060
it's just culturally, the people I speak to,
link |
00:57:06.180
it's not easy to build a business, no.
link |
00:57:11.580
It's not easy to even dream of building a business in Russia.
link |
00:57:15.740
That's just not part of the culture,
link |
00:57:17.140
part of the conversation.
link |
00:57:19.020
It's almost like the conversation is,
link |
00:57:21.700
if you wanna be the next Bill Gates or Elon Musk,
link |
00:57:25.220
or Steve Jobs or whatever, you come to America.
link |
00:57:28.820
That's the sense they have.
link |
00:57:29.980
Yeah, history matters.
link |
00:57:34.140
Is it history, is it structural problems of today?
link |
00:57:37.340
It's all the same thing.
link |
00:57:38.460
So a history of hostility to commerce,
link |
00:57:40.620
which of course the old USSR is gone,
link |
00:57:45.300
but a lot of the attitudes remain,
link |
00:57:47.220
a lot of the corruption remains.
link |
00:57:49.140
You have this legacy distribution of wealth
link |
00:57:51.020
from the auctioning off of the assets,
link |
00:57:53.220
which is not conducive to some kind of broadly egalitarian
link |
00:57:56.460
democracy, and so you have these small number
link |
00:57:59.340
of power points that try to control information and wealth
link |
00:58:03.100
and not really so keen to encourage the others
link |
00:58:06.180
who ultimately would pull the balance of political power
link |
00:58:08.900
away from the very wealthy and from Putin,
link |
00:58:11.620
and they support that culture,
link |
00:58:13.380
and the return of interest in Orthodox Church and all that,
link |
00:58:16.300
it's all part of the same piece, I think,
link |
00:58:19.300
because the old Orthodox Church is not that pro commerce,
link |
00:58:22.140
you'd have to say, but it's traditionalist,
link |
00:58:24.220
it's pro family, those are safer ideas,
link |
00:58:27.380
and then there's such a great safety valve,
link |
00:58:29.420
the most ambitious, smartest people,
link |
00:58:31.420
like they probably will learn English,
link |
00:58:33.660
they sort of can look like they belong
link |
00:58:35.820
in all sorts of other countries,
link |
00:58:37.140
they can show up and blend in, super talented,
link |
00:58:39.700
they've probably had an excellent education,
link |
00:58:42.300
especially if they're from one of the two major cities,
link |
00:58:44.460
but even if not so, even from Siberia,
link |
00:58:47.260
and they go off, they leave,
link |
00:58:49.180
they're not a source of opposition,
link |
00:58:51.220
and that keeps the whole thing up and running
link |
00:58:52.780
for another generation.
link |
00:58:54.740
Yeah, what do you make of the other big player, China?
link |
00:59:01.460
They seem to have a very different messed up,
link |
00:59:05.380
but also functioning system.
link |
00:59:09.500
They seem to be much better at encouraging entrepreneurs.
link |
00:59:13.860
They're choosing winners,
link |
00:59:15.660
but what do you make of the entire Chinese system?
link |
00:59:18.340
Why does it work as well as it does currently?
link |
00:59:22.500
What are your concerns about it,
link |
00:59:24.340
and what are its threats to the United States,
link |
00:59:28.180
or possible, what is it you said,
link |
00:59:32.780
wisdom isn't when two ideas come together,
link |
00:59:34.900
is there some possible benefits
link |
00:59:36.940
of these kinds of ideas coming together?
link |
00:59:40.420
It's amazing what China has done,
link |
00:59:42.940
but I would say to put it in perspective,
link |
00:59:44.780
if you compare them to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan,
link |
00:59:47.700
Hong Kong, and Singapore,
link |
00:59:49.500
they've still done much worse, not even close.
link |
00:59:53.460
And that's both living standards,
link |
00:59:55.140
or I hesitate to cite democracy
link |
00:59:58.060
as an unalloyed good in and of itself,
link |
01:00:00.620
but there's more freedom in all those other places by a lot.
link |
01:00:04.020
So China has all these problems of history,
link |
01:00:07.100
but they've managed, as actually the Soviets did
link |
01:00:09.580
in the middle of the 20th century,
link |
01:00:12.300
one of the two great mass migrations
link |
01:00:14.020
from the countryside to cities,
link |
01:00:15.780
which boosts productivity enormously
link |
01:00:18.220
and will sustain totalitarian systems,
link |
01:00:21.020
but they moved from a totalitarian system to an oligarchy
link |
01:00:24.620
where the CCP is actually, at least for a while,
link |
01:00:29.140
hey, have been really good at governing,
link |
01:00:31.140
have made a lot of very good decisions.
link |
01:00:33.740
You have to admit that.
link |
01:00:35.580
I don't know how long that streak will continue
link |
01:00:38.420
with one person so much now holding authority
link |
01:00:43.420
in a more extreme manner.
link |
01:00:45.820
The selection pressures for the next generation
link |
01:00:48.140
of high level CCP members probably become much worse.
link |
01:00:52.620
You have this general problem of the state owned enterprise
link |
01:00:55.260
is losing relative productivity
link |
01:00:57.100
compared to the private sector.
link |
01:00:58.780
Well, we're gonna kind of hold Jack Ma on this island
link |
01:01:02.620
and he can only issue like weird hello statements.
link |
01:01:06.140
It kind of smells bad to me.
link |
01:01:08.660
I don't feel that it's about to crash,
link |
01:01:10.900
but I don't see them supplanting America
link |
01:01:14.740
as like the world's number one country.
link |
01:01:17.300
I think they will muddle through
link |
01:01:19.260
and have very serious problems,
link |
01:01:21.740
but there's enough talent there they will muddle through.
link |
01:01:24.020
Is there ideas from China or from anywhere in general
link |
01:01:26.620
of large scale role of government
link |
01:01:29.340
that you find might be useful?
link |
01:01:30.500
Like Andrew Yang recently ran on a platform,
link |
01:01:33.780
UBI, right, Universal Basic Income.
link |
01:01:37.140
Is there some interesting ideas of large scale
link |
01:01:43.500
government sort of welfare programs at scale
link |
01:01:47.580
that you find interesting?
link |
01:01:51.700
Well, keep in mind the current version
link |
01:01:54.260
of the Chinese Communist Party post now dismantled
link |
01:01:57.900
what was called the iron rice ball.
link |
01:02:00.020
So it took apart the healthcare protections,
link |
01:02:02.340
a lot of the welfare system, a lot of the guaranteed jobs.
link |
01:02:05.900
So the economic rise of China coincided
link |
01:02:08.100
with the weakening of welfare.
link |
01:02:10.500
I'm not saying that's causal per se,
link |
01:02:12.980
but people think of China as having a government
link |
01:02:16.820
that takes care of everyone, it's very far from the truth.
link |
01:02:19.460
And by a lot of metrics,
link |
01:02:20.900
I don't mean control over people's lives,
link |
01:02:23.540
I don't mean speech, but by a lot of metrics,
link |
01:02:25.820
economically we have a lot more government than they do.
link |
01:02:28.900
So what one means here by like government, private control,
link |
01:02:32.740
I don't think you can just add up the numbers
link |
01:02:35.100
and get a simple answer.
link |
01:02:36.740
They've been fantastic at building infrastructure in cities
link |
01:02:40.780
in ways that will attract people from the countryside.
link |
01:02:44.020
And furthermore, they more or less enforce a meritocracy
link |
01:02:47.540
in this sense.
link |
01:02:48.980
Like if you're a kid of a rich guy,
link |
01:02:51.380
you'll get unfair privilege.
link |
01:02:53.220
That's unfair, but systems can afford that.
link |
01:02:56.020
If you are smart and from the countryside
link |
01:02:57.820
and your parents have nothing,
link |
01:02:59.780
you will be elevated and sent to a very good school,
link |
01:03:02.620
graduate school because of the exam system.
link |
01:03:05.180
And they do that and they mean that very consistently.
link |
01:03:08.580
It's like the Soviets had a version of that
link |
01:03:10.260
like for chess and romantic piano.
link |
01:03:12.460
Not for everything, but where they had it,
link |
01:03:14.980
like again, they were tremendous, right?
link |
01:03:17.420
Yeah, exactly.
link |
01:03:18.260
And Chinese have it in so many areas,
link |
01:03:21.060
a genuine meritocracy in this one way.
link |
01:03:23.580
That moves people from the rural to the big city
link |
01:03:26.460
and that's a big boost of productivity
link |
01:03:29.060
for some amount of time.
link |
01:03:30.500
And when they get there, they're taken seriously.
link |
01:03:32.300
Jack Ma was riding a bicycle,
link |
01:03:34.020
teaching English in his late 20s.
link |
01:03:35.740
He was a poor guy.
link |
01:03:39.180
Not a society of credentialism.
link |
01:03:41.540
Or in America, it's way too much a credentialist society.
link |
01:03:45.460
As we're talking about even with the Nobel Prize.
link |
01:03:47.940
But what do you think about these large government programs
link |
01:03:51.340
like UBI?
link |
01:03:53.180
The one version of UBI that makes the most sense to me
link |
01:03:55.860
is the Mitt Romney version, UBI for kids.
link |
01:03:59.300
Like kids are vulnerable.
link |
01:04:00.660
If their parents screw up, you shouldn't blame the kid
link |
01:04:03.060
or make the kids suffer.
link |
01:04:04.980
I believe in something like UBI for kids.
link |
01:04:07.580
Maybe just cash.
link |
01:04:09.900
But if you don't have kids, even with AI,
link |
01:04:13.540
my sense is at least in the world we know,
link |
01:04:16.420
you should be able to find a way to adjust.
link |
01:04:19.020
You might have to move to North Dakota to work,
link |
01:04:24.420
next to fracking, say.
link |
01:04:26.020
But look, before the pandemic,
link |
01:04:28.100
the two most robot intensive societies,
link |
01:04:30.540
Japan and the US, US at least for manufacturing,
link |
01:04:33.940
were at full employment.
link |
01:04:35.860
So maybe there's some far off day
link |
01:04:37.700
where there's literally no work, John Lennon,
link |
01:04:39.660
and imagine it's piped everywhere.
link |
01:04:44.060
And then we might revisit the question.
link |
01:04:47.020
But for now, we had rising wages in the Trump years
link |
01:04:51.020
and full employment.
link |
01:04:52.540
So I don't see the point.
link |
01:04:54.580
You don't see automation as a threat
link |
01:04:57.580
that fundamentally shakes our society.
link |
01:05:00.340
It's a threat in the following sense.
link |
01:05:01.940
The new technologies are harder to work with
link |
01:05:04.220
for many people, and that's a social problem.
link |
01:05:07.260
But I'm not sure a universal basic income
link |
01:05:10.420
is the right answer to that very real problem.
link |
01:05:13.460
Well, that's also, I like the UBI for kids.
link |
01:05:16.780
It's also your definition or the line,
link |
01:05:20.260
the threshold for what is vulnerable
link |
01:05:21.940
and what is basic human nature.
link |
01:05:24.740
Going back to Russia, life is suffering.
link |
01:05:27.860
That struggle is a part of life.
link |
01:05:31.220
And perhaps sort of changing,
link |
01:05:33.700
maybe what defines the 21st century
link |
01:05:36.460
is having multiple careers
link |
01:05:38.100
and adjusting and learning and evolving.
link |
01:05:41.140
And some of the technology in terms of,
link |
01:05:46.980
some of the technology we see like the internet
link |
01:05:50.620
allows us to make those pivots easier,
link |
01:05:55.820
allows later life education possible.
link |
01:05:59.060
It makes it possible.
link |
01:06:00.700
I don't know.
link |
01:06:01.540
And your earlier point about loneliness
link |
01:06:03.100
being this fundamental human problem,
link |
01:06:04.700
which I would agree with strongly,
link |
01:06:07.220
UBI, if it's at a high level, will make that worse.
link |
01:06:10.260
I mean, say UBI were higher enough,
link |
01:06:11.700
you could just sit at home.
link |
01:06:14.900
People are not gonna be happy.
link |
01:06:16.460
They don't actually want that.
link |
01:06:18.300
And we've relearned that in the pandemic.
link |
01:06:21.500
Yeah, the flip side, the hope with UBI
link |
01:06:24.060
is you have a little bit more freedom
link |
01:06:26.340
to find the thing that alleviates your loneliness.
link |
01:06:29.260
That's the idea.
link |
01:06:30.740
So it's kind of an open question.
link |
01:06:33.340
If I give you a million dollars or a billion dollars,
link |
01:06:38.260
will you pursue the thing you love?
link |
01:06:41.660
Will you be more motivated to find the thing you love,
link |
01:06:45.820
to do the thing you love,
link |
01:06:46.700
or will you be lazy and lose yourself
link |
01:06:50.140
in the sort of daily activities
link |
01:06:52.340
that don't actually bring you joy,
link |
01:06:54.860
but pacify you in some kind of way
link |
01:06:57.700
where you just let the days slip by?
link |
01:07:01.300
That's the open question.
link |
01:07:02.740
A lot of the great creators did not have huge cushions,
link |
01:07:05.580
whether it was Mozart or James Brown
link |
01:07:07.580
or the great painters in history,
link |
01:07:10.300
they had to work pretty hard.
link |
01:07:12.380
And if you look at heirs to great fortunes,
link |
01:07:15.300
maybe I'm forgetting someone,
link |
01:07:16.780
but it's hard to think of any
link |
01:07:18.620
who have creatively been important as novelists,
link |
01:07:21.860
or they might have continued to run the family business.
link |
01:07:25.940
But Van Gogh was not heir to a great family fortune.
link |
01:07:30.700
It's sad that cushions get in the way of progress.
link |
01:07:37.100
It's the same point about prizes, right?
link |
01:07:39.820
Inheriting too much money is like winning a prize.
link |
01:07:42.300
We mentioned Eric, Eric Weinstein.
link |
01:07:45.780
I know you agree on a bunch of things.
link |
01:07:47.180
Is there some beautiful, fascinating,
link |
01:07:49.260
insightful disagreement that you have
link |
01:07:51.700
that has yet to be resolved with him?
link |
01:07:54.100
Is there some ideas that you guys battle it out on?
link |
01:07:58.140
Is it the stagnation question that you mentioned?
link |
01:08:00.560
That's one of them, but here's at least two others.
link |
01:08:05.180
But I would stress Eric is always evolving.
link |
01:08:08.000
So I'm just talking about a time slice Eric, right?
link |
01:08:10.700
I don't know where he's at right now.
link |
01:08:12.940
Like I heard him on Clubhouse three nights ago,
link |
01:08:15.020
but that was three nights ago.
link |
01:08:17.780
But I think he's far too pessimistic
link |
01:08:20.060
about the impact of immigration on U.S. science.
link |
01:08:23.500
He thinks it has displaced U.S. scientists,
link |
01:08:26.580
which I think that is partly true.
link |
01:08:28.700
I just think we've gotten better talent.
link |
01:08:30.300
I'm like, bring it on, double down.
link |
01:08:33.180
And look at Kiriko, who basically came up
link |
01:08:35.820
with mRNA vaccines, she was from Hungary.
link |
01:08:37.980
And was ridiculed and mocked,
link |
01:08:41.140
she couldn't get her papers published.
link |
01:08:42.780
She stuck at it.
link |
01:08:44.920
An American might not have been so stubborn
link |
01:08:47.900
because we have these cushions.
link |
01:08:49.760
So Eric is all worried, like mathematicians coming in,
link |
01:08:52.860
they're discouraging native U.S. citizens from doing math.
link |
01:08:56.940
I'm like, bring in the best people.
link |
01:08:59.460
If we all end up in other avocations,
link |
01:09:02.720
absolutely fine by me.
link |
01:09:04.100
Does it trouble you that we kick them out
link |
01:09:06.820
after they get a degree often?
link |
01:09:08.700
I would give anyone with a plausible graduate degree
link |
01:09:11.460
a green card, universally.
link |
01:09:13.460
Yeah, I agree with that, it makes no sense.
link |
01:09:17.140
It makes so strange that the best people that come here
link |
01:09:19.940
suffer here, create awesome stuff here,
link |
01:09:22.660
then when we kick them out, it doesn't make any sense.
link |
01:09:24.460
Here's another view I have.
link |
01:09:25.580
I call it open borders for Belarus.
link |
01:09:29.140
Now Russia's a big country.
link |
01:09:30.340
I would gladly increase the Russian quota
link |
01:09:33.460
by three X, four X, five X, not 20%, but a big boost.
link |
01:09:39.380
But Belarus, a small country, and they're poor,
link |
01:09:44.300
and they have decent education, and a lot of talent there.
link |
01:09:47.780
Why can't we just open the door
link |
01:09:50.140
and convert a Belarus passport to a green card?
link |
01:09:53.500
Open borders for Belarus, it's my new campaign slogan.
link |
01:09:56.660
Are you running for president in 2024?
link |
01:09:58.740
Well, write ins are welcome, but.
link |
01:10:00.460
Okay, what's the second thing you disagree with, Eric?
link |
01:10:05.700
Trade, again, I'm not sure where he's at now,
link |
01:10:10.220
but he is suspicious of trade in a way that I am not.
link |
01:10:14.820
I do understand what's called the China shock
link |
01:10:17.300
has been a big problem for the US middle class.
link |
01:10:19.860
I fully accept that.
link |
01:10:21.380
I think most of that is behind us.
link |
01:10:24.020
National security issues aside,
link |
01:10:25.960
I think free trade is very much a good thing.
link |
01:10:29.200
Eric, I'm not sure he'll say it's not a good thing,
link |
01:10:33.060
but he won't say it is a good thing.
link |
01:10:34.840
And I know he's kind of, it's like, Eric, free trade.
link |
01:10:39.420
But look, on things like vaccines,
link |
01:10:40.920
I don't believe in free trade.
link |
01:10:42.880
You want vaccine production in your own country,
link |
01:10:45.540
look at the EU.
link |
01:10:47.000
They have enough money, no one will send them vaccines.
link |
01:10:50.160
What's different about vaccines?
link |
01:10:51.940
Is it, there's some things you want to prioritize
link |
01:10:54.520
the citizenry on.
link |
01:10:56.440
You could argue it would be cheaper
link |
01:10:58.120
to produce all US manufactured vaccines in India.
link |
01:11:02.040
They have the technologies, obviously lower wages,
link |
01:11:05.960
but look, there's talk in India right now
link |
01:11:07.560
of cutting off the export of vaccines.
link |
01:11:09.880
If you outsource your vaccine production,
link |
01:11:12.000
you're not sure the other country
link |
01:11:13.400
will respect the norm of free trade.
link |
01:11:15.840
So you need to keep some vaccine production in your country.
link |
01:11:20.160
It's an exception to free trade, not to the logic,
link |
01:11:24.760
a bunch of things the Navy uses.
link |
01:11:26.480
You can't buy those components from China.
link |
01:11:28.520
That's insane.
link |
01:11:31.520
But look, it would be cheaper to do so, right?
link |
01:11:34.140
Yeah.
link |
01:11:35.360
Let me completely shift topics
link |
01:11:37.360
on something that's fascinating.
link |
01:11:38.720
It's all the same topic, but great.
link |
01:11:40.960
Everything is interesting.
link |
01:11:45.560
What do you think about what the hell is money?
link |
01:11:48.800
And the recent excitement around cryptocurrency
link |
01:11:56.880
that brings to the forefront
link |
01:12:01.120
the philosophical discussion of the nature of money.
link |
01:12:04.880
Are you bullish on cryptocurrency?
link |
01:12:06.840
Are you excited about it?
link |
01:12:07.900
What does it make you think about
link |
01:12:09.560
how the nature of money is changing?
link |
01:12:11.840
No one knows what money is.
link |
01:12:13.720
Probably no one ever knew.
link |
01:12:15.560
Go back to medieval times, bills of exchange.
link |
01:12:17.920
Were they money?
link |
01:12:19.460
Maybe it's just a semantic debate.
link |
01:12:21.500
Gold, silver, what about copper coins?
link |
01:12:23.360
What about metals that were considered legal tender
link |
01:12:26.380
but not always circulating?
link |
01:12:28.280
What about credit?
link |
01:12:29.700
So being confused about moneyness
link |
01:12:32.480
is the natural state of affairs for human beings.
link |
01:12:35.240
And if there's more of that,
link |
01:12:36.240
I'd say that's probably a good thing.
link |
01:12:38.880
Now, crypto per se, I think Bitcoin has taken over
link |
01:12:42.920
a lot of the space held by gold.
link |
01:12:45.560
That to me seems sustainable.
link |
01:12:48.160
I'm not short Bitcoin.
link |
01:12:50.360
I don't have some view that the price
link |
01:12:53.460
has to be different than the current price,
link |
01:12:55.100
but I know it changes every moment.
link |
01:12:58.360
I am deeply uncertain about the less of crypto,
link |
01:13:01.180
which seems connected to ultimate visions
link |
01:13:04.480
of using it for transactions in ways where I'm not sure
link |
01:13:09.360
whether it be prediction markets or DeFi.
link |
01:13:12.460
I'm not sure the retail demand really is there
link |
01:13:16.200
once it is regulated like everything else is.
link |
01:13:19.500
I would say I'm 40, 60 optimistic on those forms of crypto.
link |
01:13:24.360
That is, I think it's somewhat more likely
link |
01:13:26.020
they fail than succeed, but I take them very seriously.
link |
01:13:29.140
So we're talking about it becoming
link |
01:13:31.160
one of the main currencies in the world.
link |
01:13:32.920
That's what we're discussing.
link |
01:13:33.760
That I don't think will happen.
link |
01:13:35.720
So, but the reality is that Bitcoin used to be
link |
01:13:40.420
in the single digits of a dollar and now has crossed $50,000
link |
01:13:44.720
for a single Bitcoin.
link |
01:13:46.600
Do you think it's possible it reaches
link |
01:13:48.600
something like a million dollars?
link |
01:13:51.480
I don't think we have a good theory of the value of Bitcoin.
link |
01:13:54.280
If people decide it's worth a million dollars,
link |
01:13:56.160
it's worth a million dollars.
link |
01:13:57.760
But isn't that money?
link |
01:13:58.600
Like you said, isn't the ultimate state of money confusion,
link |
01:14:01.640
however beautifully you put it?
link |
01:14:03.200
It's like valuing an Andy Warhol painting.
link |
01:14:05.040
So when Warhol started off,
link |
01:14:06.960
probably those things had no value.
link |
01:14:08.880
They were sketches, early sketches of shoes.
link |
01:14:11.560
Now a good Warhol could be worth over 50 million.
link |
01:14:14.960
That's an incredible rate of price appreciation.
link |
01:14:17.600
Bitcoin is seeing a similar trajectory.
link |
01:14:20.640
I don't pretend to know where it will stop,
link |
01:14:23.780
but it's about trying to figure out
link |
01:14:25.240
what do people think of Andy Warhol?
link |
01:14:26.760
He could be out of fashion in a century.
link |
01:14:29.600
Maybe yes, maybe no.
link |
01:14:32.680
But you don't think about Warhols as money.
link |
01:14:36.560
They perform some money like functions.
link |
01:14:38.640
You can even use them as collateral
link |
01:14:40.640
for like deals between gangs.
link |
01:14:43.520
But they're not basically money, nor is Bitcoin.
link |
01:14:46.880
And the transactions velocity of Bitcoin,
link |
01:14:48.960
I would think is likely to fall, if anything.
link |
01:14:51.320
So you don't think there'll be some kind of phase shift
link |
01:14:53.320
where it become adopted and become mainstream
link |
01:14:55.440
for one of the main mechanisms of transactions?
link |
01:15:00.200
Bitcoin, no.
link |
01:15:01.020
Now, you know, ether has some chance at that.
link |
01:15:03.380
I would bet against it,
link |
01:15:04.840
but I wouldn't give you a definitive no.
link |
01:15:06.840
And you wouldn't put us here.
link |
01:15:07.680
Bitcoin is too costly.
link |
01:15:10.160
It may be fine to hold it like gold,
link |
01:15:12.400
but gold is also costly.
link |
01:15:15.200
You have smart people trying to make, say, ether,
link |
01:15:18.360
much more effective as a currency than Bitcoin.
link |
01:15:22.560
And there's certainly a decent chance they will succeed.
link |
01:15:25.600
Yeah, there's a lot of innovation.
link |
01:15:26.720
I mean, with smart contracts, with NFTs as well,
link |
01:15:30.120
there's a lot of interesting innovations
link |
01:15:33.440
that are plugging into the human psyche somehow,
link |
01:15:36.120
just like money does.
link |
01:15:37.760
You know, money seems to be this viral thing,
link |
01:15:41.360
our ideas of money, right?
link |
01:15:43.080
And if the idea is strong enough,
link |
01:15:45.360
it seems to be able to take hold.
link |
01:15:47.740
Like there's network effects that just take over.
link |
01:15:50.880
And like, I particularly see that with,
link |
01:15:54.060
I'd love to get your comment on Dogecoin,
link |
01:15:57.400
which is basically by a single human being,
link |
01:15:59.760
Elon Musk has been created.
link |
01:16:01.400
You know, it's like these celebrities
link |
01:16:03.200
can have a huge ripple effect on the impact of money.
link |
01:16:07.160
Is it possible that in the 21st century,
link |
01:16:11.560
people like Elon Musk and celebrities,
link |
01:16:13.840
I don't know, Donald Trump, The Rock,
link |
01:16:16.120
whoever else, can actually define,
link |
01:16:20.680
you know, the currencies that we use?
link |
01:16:22.320
Maybe can Dogecoin become the primary currency of the world?
link |
01:16:27.400
I think of it as like baseball cards.
link |
01:16:29.280
So right now, every baseball player has a baseball card.
link |
01:16:32.800
And the players who are stars,
link |
01:16:34.120
their cards can end up worth a fair amount of money.
link |
01:16:37.280
And that's stable, we've had it for many decades.
link |
01:16:40.780
Sort of the player defines the card,
link |
01:16:42.840
they sign a contract with Topps or whatever company.
link |
01:16:46.200
Now, could you imagine celebrities, baseball players,
link |
01:16:49.040
LeBron James, having their own currencies instead of cards?
link |
01:16:53.000
Absolutely, and you're somewhat seeing that right now,
link |
01:16:55.960
as you mentioned, artists with these unique works
link |
01:16:58.320
on the blockchain.
link |
01:16:59.340
But I'm not sure those are macroeconomically important.
link |
01:17:02.340
If it's just a new class of collectibles
link |
01:17:04.140
that people have fun with, again, I say, bring it on.
link |
01:17:08.260
But whether there are use cases beyond that,
link |
01:17:11.140
that challenge fiat monies, which actually work very well.
link |
01:17:15.380
Yesterday, I sent money to a family in Ethiopia
link |
01:17:19.340
that I helped support.
link |
01:17:21.100
In less than 24 hours, they got that money.
link |
01:17:24.020
Digitally, yes.
link |
01:17:26.300
No, not digitally, through my bank.
link |
01:17:28.340
My primitive dinosaur bank, BB&T, Mid Atlantic Bank,
link |
01:17:32.220
headquartered in North Carolina,
link |
01:17:34.500
charted by the Fed, regulated by the FDAC and the OCC.
link |
01:17:38.340
Now, you could say, well, the exchange rate was not so great.
link |
01:17:44.220
I don't see crypto as close to beating that
link |
01:17:46.580
once you take into account all of the last mile problems.
link |
01:17:50.580
Fiat currency works really well.
link |
01:17:52.660
People are not sitting around bitching about it.
link |
01:17:54.820
And when you talk to crypto people,
link |
01:17:56.260
they're crypto people, the number who have to postulate
link |
01:17:58.500
some out of the blue hyperinflation,
link |
01:18:00.700
where there's no evidence for that whatsoever,
link |
01:18:03.300
that to me is a sign they're not thinking clearly
link |
01:18:06.060
about how hard they have to work
link |
01:18:07.620
to outcompete fiat currency.
link |
01:18:10.060
There's a bunch of different technologies
link |
01:18:11.860
that are really exciting that don't want to address
link |
01:18:15.860
how difficult it is to outcompete
link |
01:18:17.780
the current accepted alternative.
link |
01:18:19.220
So for example, autonomous vehicles.
link |
01:18:21.780
A lot of people are really excited.
link |
01:18:24.100
But it's not trivial to outcompete Uber
link |
01:18:28.060
on the cost and the effectiveness and the user experience
link |
01:18:32.300
and all those kinds of, sorry, Uber driven by humans.
link |
01:18:34.940
And it's not, you know, that's taken for granted,
link |
01:18:39.380
I think, that look, wouldn't it be amazing,
link |
01:18:41.980
how amazing would the world look
link |
01:18:43.260
when the cars are driving themselves fully,
link |
01:18:45.580
you know, it's gonna drive the cost down,
link |
01:18:47.220
you can remove the cost of drivers,
link |
01:18:48.620
all those kinds of things.
link |
01:18:50.180
But it's when you actually get down to it
link |
01:18:52.180
and have to build a business around it,
link |
01:18:53.620
it's actually very difficult to do.
link |
01:18:55.500
And I guess you're saying your sense
link |
01:18:56.860
is similar competition is facing cryptocurrency.
link |
01:19:00.300
Like you have to actually present a killer app reason
link |
01:19:06.740
to switch from fiat currency to Ethereum or to whatever.
link |
01:19:12.900
And the Biden people are gonna regulate crypto
link |
01:19:15.500
and they're gonna do it soon.
link |
01:19:16.980
So something like DeFi, I fully get why that is cheaper
link |
01:19:20.700
or for some can be cheaper than other ways
link |
01:19:23.300
of conducting financial intermediation.
link |
01:19:25.620
But some of that is regulatory arbitrage.
link |
01:19:28.500
It will not be allowed to go on forever
link |
01:19:30.740
for better or worse.
link |
01:19:32.300
I would rather see it given greater tolerance.
link |
01:19:35.140
But the point is banking lobby is strong.
link |
01:19:37.540
The government will only let it run so far.
link |
01:19:39.980
There'll be capital requirements,
link |
01:19:41.380
reporting requirements imposed,
link |
01:19:43.420
and it will lose a lot of those advantages.
link |
01:19:46.620
What do you make of Wall Street bets?
link |
01:19:48.820
Another thing that recently happened
link |
01:19:50.620
that shook the world and at least me
link |
01:19:54.700
from the outside of perspective,
link |
01:19:56.860
make me question what I do
link |
01:19:58.500
and don't understand about our economics.
link |
01:20:01.380
Which is a bunch of different,
link |
01:20:03.500
a large number of individuals
link |
01:20:05.140
getting together on the internet
link |
01:20:06.780
and having a large scale impact on the markets.
link |
01:20:10.260
If you tell a group of people
link |
01:20:11.740
and coordinate them through the internet,
link |
01:20:13.420
we're gonna play a fun game, it might cost you money,
link |
01:20:16.060
but you're gonna make the headlines
link |
01:20:17.460
and there's a chance you'll screw over
link |
01:20:18.860
some billionaires and hedge funds.
link |
01:20:20.820
Enough people will play that game.
link |
01:20:23.020
So that game might continue,
link |
01:20:24.260
but I don't think it's of macroeconomic importance.
link |
01:20:26.900
And the price of those stocks in the medium term
link |
01:20:30.660
will end up wherever it ought to be.
link |
01:20:32.980
So these are little outliers
link |
01:20:34.980
from a macroeconomics perspective.
link |
01:20:36.780
They're not going to,
link |
01:20:38.740
these are not signals of shifting power,
link |
01:20:43.620
like from centralized power to distributed power.
link |
01:20:46.300
These aren't some fundamental changes in the way
link |
01:20:49.220
our economy works.
link |
01:20:50.260
I think of it as a new brand of eSports,
link |
01:20:52.500
maybe more fun than the old brand.
link |
01:20:54.140
Which is fine, right?
link |
01:20:56.340
It's like push the anarchy into the corners
link |
01:20:58.540
where you want it.
link |
01:20:59.660
It doesn't bother me,
link |
01:21:02.700
but I think people are seeing it
link |
01:21:04.100
as more fun than it is.
link |
01:21:05.260
It's a new eSport, more fun for many,
link |
01:21:07.620
but more expensive than the old eSports.
link |
01:21:10.940
Like chess is a new eSport, super cheap,
link |
01:21:13.660
not as fun as like sending hedge funds to their doom,
link |
01:21:16.900
but like, what would you expect?
link |
01:21:19.900
The poetry, I love it, okay.
link |
01:21:22.420
But macroeconomically, it's not fundamental.
link |
01:21:24.900
Okay, I was going to say, I hope you're right,
link |
01:21:27.380
because I'm uncomfortable with the chaos
link |
01:21:29.820
of the masses that's creates.
link |
01:21:32.380
But I also think that chaos is somewhat real to be clear,
link |
01:21:36.980
but it will matter through other channels,
link |
01:21:40.620
not through manipulating GameStop or AMC.
link |
01:21:46.140
So you're seeing the real macro phenomenon.
link |
01:21:48.540
When people see a real macro phenomenon,
link |
01:21:50.740
they tend to make every micro story fit the narrative.
link |
01:21:54.020
And this micro story, like it fits the narrative,
link |
01:21:56.220
but it doesn't mean its importance fits the narrative.
link |
01:21:58.980
That's how I would kind of dissect the mistake
link |
01:22:01.780
I think people are making.
link |
01:22:05.060
The macro phenomenon that are there, do you mean?
link |
01:22:07.820
Everyone's weird now, the internet.
link |
01:22:10.540
Either allows us to be weirder or makes us weirder.
link |
01:22:12.980
I'm not sure what's the right way to put it.
link |
01:22:14.540
Maybe a mix of both.
link |
01:22:16.420
You're probably right that it allows us to be weirder
link |
01:22:18.780
because, well, this is the other, okay.
link |
01:22:21.340
So this connects our previous conversation.
link |
01:22:23.980
Does America allow us to be weirder
link |
01:22:26.660
or does it make us weirder?
link |
01:22:29.220
Like say we're weird and somewhat neurotic to begin with,
link |
01:22:32.300
but the only messages we get are Dwight D. Eisenhower
link |
01:22:34.940
and I Love Lucy and network TV.
link |
01:22:37.580
Like that's going to keep us within certain bounds.
link |
01:22:40.060
In good and bad ways.
link |
01:22:41.660
That's obviously totally gone.
link |
01:22:43.860
And the internet, you can connect to not just QAnon,
link |
01:22:47.020
but all sorts of things.
link |
01:22:47.980
Many of them just fantastic, right?
link |
01:22:51.260
But in good and bad ways, it makes us weirder.
link |
01:22:54.260
So that maybe is troubling, right?
link |
01:22:56.700
Like if someone's worried about that,
link |
01:22:58.020
I would at least say they should
link |
01:22:59.580
give it deep serious thought.
link |
01:23:01.500
And then it has a whole lot of ebbs and flows,
link |
01:23:04.620
micro realizations of the weirdness
link |
01:23:07.580
that don't actually matter.
link |
01:23:09.580
So like chess players today,
link |
01:23:10.940
they play a lot more weird openings
link |
01:23:12.580
than they did 20 years ago.
link |
01:23:14.580
Like it reflects the same thing
link |
01:23:16.740
because you can research any weird opening on the internet,
link |
01:23:19.140
but like, does that matter?
link |
01:23:21.140
Probably not.
link |
01:23:22.460
So a lot of the things we see
link |
01:23:23.780
are just like the weird chess openings.
link |
01:23:26.020
And to figure out which are like the weird chess openings
link |
01:23:28.340
and which are fundamental to the new and growing weirdness,
link |
01:23:31.540
like that's what a hedge fund investor type
link |
01:23:33.500
should be trying to do.
link |
01:23:35.020
I just think no one knows yet.
link |
01:23:36.900
It's like this itself, this fun weird guessing game,
link |
01:23:40.020
which we're partly engaging in right now.
link |
01:23:42.220
Exactly.
link |
01:23:43.260
And I mean, as Eric talks about
link |
01:23:46.180
on the science side of things,
link |
01:23:47.980
I mean, I said like at MIT,
link |
01:23:50.100
especially in the machine learning field,
link |
01:23:52.460
there's a natural institutional resistance to the weird.
link |
01:23:56.180
It's very, as they talk about,
link |
01:23:58.220
it's difficult to hire weird faculty, for example.
link |
01:24:00.940
Correct.
link |
01:24:03.220
You want to hire and give tenure to people that are safe
link |
01:24:06.380
and not weird.
link |
01:24:07.620
And that's one of the concerns is like,
link |
01:24:09.700
it seems like the weird people
link |
01:24:10.980
are the ones that push the science forward usually.
link |
01:24:13.060
Right.
link |
01:24:14.060
And so like, how do you balance the two?
link |
01:24:16.620
It's not obvious.
link |
01:24:17.820
Because it's another area where Eric and I disagree.
link |
01:24:20.500
As I interpret him,
link |
01:24:21.940
he thinks academia is totally bankrupt.
link |
01:24:24.460
And I think it's only partially bankrupt.
link |
01:24:27.860
How do we fix it?
link |
01:24:28.700
Because I'm with you, I'm bullish on academia.
link |
01:24:31.980
You need up and coming schools
link |
01:24:34.180
that end up better than where they started off.
link |
01:24:36.300
And MIT was once one of them.
link |
01:24:38.420
Yes.
link |
01:24:39.260
Now they're not in every area.
link |
01:24:40.500
In some areas, they have become the problem.
link |
01:24:42.580
Yep.
link |
01:24:43.420
UChicago, you wouldn't call it up and coming,
link |
01:24:45.220
but it's still different.
link |
01:24:46.300
And that's great.
link |
01:24:47.140
Let's hope they manage to keep it that way.
link |
01:24:51.100
The biggest problem to me is the rank absurd conformism.
link |
01:24:55.260
I kind of second tier schools,
link |
01:24:57.060
maybe in the top 40, but not in the top dozen,
link |
01:24:59.900
that are just trying to be like a junior MIT,
link |
01:25:02.620
but it's mediocre and copycat.
link |
01:25:04.820
And they're the most dogmatic enforcers of weirdness
link |
01:25:07.340
that like Harvard is more open
link |
01:25:09.580
than those second tier schools.
link |
01:25:11.340
And those second tier schools
link |
01:25:12.580
are pretty good typically, right?
link |
01:25:13.980
Yeah.
link |
01:25:14.820
But the mediocrity is enforced there.
link |
01:25:17.340
Correct.
link |
01:25:18.180
Very strictly.
link |
01:25:19.460
And the homogenization pressures.
link |
01:25:21.220
Climb the rankings by another three places
link |
01:25:24.460
and be a little closer to MIT,
link |
01:25:25.860
though you'll never touch them.
link |
01:25:27.260
That to me is very harmful.
link |
01:25:28.740
And you'd rather they be more like Chicago,
link |
01:25:30.900
more like Caltech, or the older Caltech all the more,
link |
01:25:33.940
like pick some model, be weird in it.
link |
01:25:37.380
You might fail.
link |
01:25:38.900
That's socially better.
link |
01:25:40.580
Yeah, but so the problem with MIT, for example,
link |
01:25:43.660
is the mediocrity is really enforced on the junior faculty.
link |
01:25:49.300
Yeah.
link |
01:25:50.140
So like the people that are allowed to be weird,
link |
01:25:52.620
or actually they just don't even ask for permissions anymore
link |
01:25:54.900
are more senior faculty.
link |
01:25:56.340
And that's good, of course,
link |
01:25:57.780
but you want the weird young people.
link |
01:26:00.300
I find too, this podcast, I like talking to tech people,
link |
01:26:06.220
and I find the young faculty to be really boring.
link |
01:26:08.740
They are.
link |
01:26:09.580
They're the most boring of faculty.
link |
01:26:11.100
Their work is interesting technically,
link |
01:26:13.740
technically, but just the passion.
link |
01:26:18.100
They are drudges.
link |
01:26:19.340
And some of them sneak by.
link |
01:26:23.380
Like you have like the Max Tegmark,
link |
01:26:24.980
young version of Max Tegmark,
link |
01:26:26.420
who knows how to play the role of boring and fitting in.
link |
01:26:31.700
And then on the side, he does the weird shit.
link |
01:26:34.380
Sure.
link |
01:26:35.380
But they're far and few in between,
link |
01:26:37.380
which I'd love to figure out a way to shake up that system
link |
01:26:41.460
because as you look at MIT's Broad Institute, right,
link |
01:26:45.140
in biomedical, it's been a huge hit.
link |
01:26:47.300
I'm not privy to their internal doings,
link |
01:26:49.420
but I suspect they support weird
link |
01:26:52.460
more than the formal departments do at the junior level.
link |
01:26:55.340
Yes, that's probably true.
link |
01:26:56.500
Yeah, I don't know what, whatever they're doing,
link |
01:26:58.940
it's working, but we needed to figure it out
link |
01:27:03.580
because I think the best ideas still do come from the,
link |
01:27:07.660
so forget, my apologies,
link |
01:27:10.140
but for the humanities side of things,
link |
01:27:11.660
I don't know anything about,
link |
01:27:12.820
but the engineering and the science side,
link |
01:27:15.660
I think there's so many amazing ideas
link |
01:27:17.740
that are still coming from universities.
link |
01:27:19.780
It's not true that you don't know anything
link |
01:27:21.220
about the humanities.
link |
01:27:22.060
You're doing the humanities right now.
link |
01:27:24.460
Talking about people,
link |
01:27:25.740
there are no numbers put on a blackboard, right?
link |
01:27:28.340
There's no hypothesis testing per se.
link |
01:27:30.260
No, yeah.
link |
01:27:31.100
You have however many subscribers to your podcast,
link |
01:27:34.580
all listening to you on the humanities.
link |
01:27:37.060
Every, whatever your frequency is.
link |
01:27:38.820
But I'm not in the department of the humanities.
link |
01:27:40.940
That's why it's innovative.
link |
01:27:42.420
They have very different conversations.
link |
01:27:44.900
There's the number of emails I get about,
link |
01:27:48.180
listen, I really deeply respect diversity
link |
01:27:51.860
and the full scope of what diversity means
link |
01:27:56.220
and also the more narrow scope of different races
link |
01:27:58.380
and genders and so on.
link |
01:27:59.380
It's a really important topic,
link |
01:28:01.020
but there's a disproportionate number of emails
link |
01:28:03.100
I'm getting about meetings and discussions
link |
01:28:05.980
and that just kind of is overwhelming.
link |
01:28:08.540
I don't get enough emails from people,
link |
01:28:10.860
like a meeting about why are all your ideas bad?
link |
01:28:15.980
Let's, for example, let me call out MIT.
link |
01:28:18.820
Why don't we do more?
link |
01:28:20.360
Why don't we kick Stanford's ass or Google's ass,
link |
01:28:24.280
more importantly, in deep learning and machine learning
link |
01:28:26.600
and AI research?
link |
01:28:28.240
What CSAIL, for example, used to be a laboratory
link |
01:28:31.600
is a laboratory for artificial intelligence research.
link |
01:28:35.080
And why is that not the beacon of greatness
link |
01:28:42.400
in artificial intelligence?
link |
01:28:43.760
Let's have those meetings as well.
link |
01:28:45.720
Diversity talk has oddly become this new mechanism
link |
01:28:48.920
for enforcing conformity.
link |
01:28:50.440
Yes, exactly.
link |
01:28:51.280
And right, so it's almost like this conformity mechanism
link |
01:28:54.320
finds the hot new topic to use
link |
01:28:56.800
to enforce further conformity.
link |
01:28:58.200
Exactly.
link |
01:28:59.680
Oh boy, I still, I remain optimistic.
link |
01:29:03.480
The humanities have innovated through podcasts,
link |
01:29:05.600
including yours and mine, and they're alive and well.
link |
01:29:08.680
All the bad talk you hear about the humanities
link |
01:29:12.520
in universities, there's been this huge end run
link |
01:29:15.120
of innovation on the internet and it's amazing.
link |
01:29:17.640
You're right.
link |
01:29:18.480
I never thought of, I mean, this is humanities.
link |
01:29:20.680
This podcast is right.
link |
01:29:23.400
It's like you've been speaking prose all one's life
link |
01:29:25.040
and didn't know it, right?
link |
01:29:28.080
Yeah, I am actually part of the humanities department
link |
01:29:31.000
at MIT now.
link |
01:29:31.840
I did not realize this and I will fully embrace it
link |
01:29:35.000
from this moment on.
link |
01:29:36.080
Look, you have this thing, the Media Lab.
link |
01:29:37.560
I'm sure you know about it.
link |
01:29:39.040
Done some excellent things, done a lot of very bogus things,
link |
01:29:42.400
but you're out competing them.
link |
01:29:43.680
You're blowing them out of the water.
link |
01:29:44.960
Yeah.
link |
01:29:45.800
Like you are them.
link |
01:29:46.880
Yeah, I mean, and I'm talking to those folks
link |
01:29:48.480
and they're just trying to, well,
link |
01:29:50.440
they're just trying to figure it out.
link |
01:29:51.480
I mean, they had their issues with Jeff Epstein and so on,
link |
01:29:53.920
but outside of that, there's a,
link |
01:29:57.840
I've actually gone through a shift
link |
01:29:59.960
with this particular podcast, for example,
link |
01:30:02.240
where at first it was seen as a,
link |
01:30:06.240
one, at the very first it was seen as a distraction.
link |
01:30:09.560
Second, it was a source of like,
link |
01:30:12.000
almost like a kind of jealousy,
link |
01:30:13.720
like the same kind of jealousy you feel
link |
01:30:15.280
when junior faculty outshines the senior faculty.
link |
01:30:18.960
And now it's more like, oh, okay, this is a thing.
link |
01:30:22.240
Like we should do more of that.
link |
01:30:23.800
We should embrace this guy.
link |
01:30:25.200
We should embrace this thing.
link |
01:30:26.880
So there's a sense that podcasting and whatever this is,
link |
01:30:30.680
it doesn't have to be podcasting,
link |
01:30:32.760
will drive some innovation within MIT,
link |
01:30:35.440
within different universities.
link |
01:30:37.560
There's a sense that things are changing.
link |
01:30:39.160
It's just that universities lag behind.
link |
01:30:41.800
And my hope is that they catch up quickly.
link |
01:30:45.760
They innovate in some way that goes along
link |
01:30:49.520
with the innovations of the internet.
link |
01:30:51.840
Online.
link |
01:30:52.680
I think the internet will outrace them
link |
01:30:53.520
for a long time, maybe forever.
link |
01:30:55.720
Well, I mean, but it's okay if they're,
link |
01:30:57.640
as long as they're keeping.
link |
01:30:58.600
Yeah, and we're both in universities.
link |
01:31:00.160
So we have multiple hats on here as we're speaking.
link |
01:31:02.680
So we can complain about the universities,
link |
01:31:05.760
but that's like complaining about the podcast, right?
link |
01:31:08.760
We be them.
link |
01:31:09.600
But speaking on the weird,
link |
01:31:12.440
you've in the best sense of the word weird,
link |
01:31:16.400
you've written about and made the case
link |
01:31:18.520
that we should take UFO sightings more seriously.
link |
01:31:22.280
So that's one of the things that I've been inundated with,
link |
01:31:29.920
sort of the excitement and the passion that people have
link |
01:31:36.400
for the possibility of extraterrestrial life,
link |
01:31:39.200
of life out there in the universe.
link |
01:31:40.720
I've always felt this excitement.
link |
01:31:42.440
I was just looking up at the stars
link |
01:31:43.760
and wondering what the hell's out there.
link |
01:31:46.160
But there's people that have more like,
link |
01:31:48.840
more grounded excitement and passion
link |
01:31:52.160
of actually interacting with aliens
link |
01:31:55.080
on this here, our planet.
link |
01:31:57.880
What's the case from your perspective
link |
01:32:01.240
for taking these sightings more seriously?
link |
01:32:05.020
The data from the Navy, to me, seem quite serious.
link |
01:32:09.020
I don't pretend that I have the technical abilities
link |
01:32:11.580
to judge it as data,
link |
01:32:13.940
but there are numerous senators
link |
01:32:16.100
at the very highest of levels,
link |
01:32:18.220
former heads of CIA, Brennan.
link |
01:32:20.180
I talked to him, did an interview with him.
link |
01:32:22.540
I asked him, what's up with these?
link |
01:32:24.580
What do you think it is?
link |
01:32:25.420
He basically said that was the single most likely explanation
link |
01:32:28.740
was of alien origin.
link |
01:32:30.020
Now you don't have to agree with him.
link |
01:32:32.340
But look, if you know how government works, these senators,
link |
01:32:35.180
or Hillary Clinton, for that matter, or Brennan,
link |
01:32:37.700
they sat down, they were briefed by their smartest people,
link |
01:32:40.380
and they said, hey, what's going on here?
link |
01:32:43.900
And everyone around the table, I believe,
link |
01:32:45.580
is telling them, we don't know.
link |
01:32:48.180
And that is sociological data I take very seriously.
link |
01:32:52.660
I have not seen a debunking of the technical data,
link |
01:32:56.460
which is eyewitness reports and images and radar.
link |
01:32:59.060
Again, I don't pretend that I have the technical abilities
link |
01:33:02.020
or again, at a technical level,
link |
01:33:03.860
I feel quite uncertain on that turf.
link |
01:33:06.660
But evaluating through the testimony of witnesses,
link |
01:33:10.020
it seems to me it's now at a threshold
link |
01:33:12.660
where one ought to take it seriously.
link |
01:33:15.140
Yeah, one of the problems with UFO sightings
link |
01:33:18.500
is that because of people with good equipment
link |
01:33:21.940
don't take it seriously, it's such a taboo topic,
link |
01:33:25.140
that you have just like really shitty equipment
link |
01:33:28.100
collecting data.
link |
01:33:28.940
And so you have the blurry Bigfoot kind of situation
link |
01:33:32.460
where you have just bad video and all those kinds of things.
link |
01:33:35.700
As opposed to, I mean, there's a bunch of people,
link |
01:33:41.180
Avi Lo from Harvard talking about Oumuamua.
link |
01:33:44.860
It's just like people with the equipment
link |
01:33:49.660
to do the data collection don't want to help out.
link |
01:33:54.220
And that creates a kind of divide
link |
01:33:57.820
where the scientists ignore that this is happening
link |
01:34:00.740
and there's the masses of people who are curious about it.
link |
01:34:04.100
And then there's the government that's full of secrets
link |
01:34:07.020
that's leaking some confusion
link |
01:34:10.780
and it creates distrust in the government,
link |
01:34:12.820
it creates distrust in science
link |
01:34:15.260
and it prevents the scientists
link |
01:34:16.980
from being able to explore some cool topics,
link |
01:34:19.860
some exciting possibilities that they should be,
link |
01:34:22.780
be curious kids like Avi talks about.
link |
01:34:25.340
Even if it has nothing to do with aliens,
link |
01:34:28.540
whatever the answer is, it has to be something fascinating.
link |
01:34:31.220
We already know everything's interesting,
link |
01:34:32.620
but this is fascinating.
link |
01:34:36.020
But look, that all said,
link |
01:34:37.020
I suspect they're not of alien origin.
link |
01:34:39.060
And let me tell you my reason.
link |
01:34:40.380
The people who are all gung ho,
link |
01:34:43.220
they do a kind of reasoning in reverse
link |
01:34:45.220
or argument from elimination.
link |
01:34:47.740
They figure out a bunch of things that can't be,
link |
01:34:49.900
like is it a Russian advanced vehicle?
link |
01:34:52.340
No, probably pretty good arguments there.
link |
01:34:54.580
Is it a Chinese advanced vehicle?
link |
01:34:56.340
No.
link |
01:34:57.300
Is it people like from the earth's future
link |
01:35:00.180
coming back in time?
link |
01:35:01.500
No.
link |
01:35:02.340
And they go through a few others.
link |
01:35:03.620
They have some really good no arguments.
link |
01:35:05.020
Then they're like, well, what we've got left is aliens.
link |
01:35:07.980
This argument from elimination,
link |
01:35:09.700
I don't actually find that persuasive.
link |
01:35:12.500
You can talk yourself into a lot of mistaken ideas that way.
link |
01:35:16.060
The positive evidence that it's aliens is still quite weak.
link |
01:35:20.500
The positive evidence that it's a puzzle is quite huge.
link |
01:35:24.100
And whatever the solution to the puzzle is,
link |
01:35:27.180
it might be fascinating.
link |
01:35:28.500
And it's gonna be so weird or fascinating
link |
01:35:30.580
or maybe even trivial, but that's weird in its own way,
link |
01:35:33.540
that we can't set up by elimination
link |
01:35:37.060
all the things that might be able to be.
link |
01:35:38.700
Yeah, and just like you said,
link |
01:35:39.980
the debunking that I've seen of these kinds of things
link |
01:35:43.820
are less explorations and solutions to the puzzle
link |
01:35:49.380
and more a kind of halfhearted dismissal.
link |
01:35:52.820
And Avi, as you mentioned to him on your podcast with him,
link |
01:35:56.620
he's been attacked an awful lot.
link |
01:35:58.820
And when I hear the idea carrier attacked,
link |
01:36:01.300
I get very suspicious of the critics.
link |
01:36:04.620
If he's wrong, like just tell me why.
link |
01:36:07.220
Like my ears are open.
link |
01:36:08.940
I don't have a set view on Oumuamua, you know.
link |
01:36:12.460
I know I can't judge Avi's arguments.
link |
01:36:14.460
He can't convince me in that sense.
link |
01:36:15.980
I'm too stupid to understand
link |
01:36:18.180
how good his argument may or may not be.
link |
01:36:20.740
And like you said, ultimately,
link |
01:36:23.140
in the argument, in the meeting of that debate
link |
01:36:27.980
is where we find the wisdom.
link |
01:36:30.580
Like dismissing it, there's one other thing
link |
01:36:32.180
that troubles me.
link |
01:36:33.020
There's a bunch of people,
link |
01:36:33.860
like Nietzsche sometimes dismiss this way.
link |
01:36:35.500
Ayn Rand is sometimes dismissed this way.
link |
01:36:38.100
Oh, here we go.
link |
01:36:38.940
Like there's a, as opposed to arguing against her ideas,
link |
01:36:43.100
dismissing it outright.
link |
01:36:44.900
And that's not productive at all.
link |
01:36:48.340
She may be wrong on a lot of things,
link |
01:36:49.780
but like laying out some arguments,
link |
01:36:52.900
even if they're basic human arguments,
link |
01:36:55.740
that's where we arrive at the wisdom.
link |
01:36:57.980
I love that.
link |
01:36:59.820
Is there something deeper to be said
link |
01:37:03.300
about our trust in institutions and governments and so on
link |
01:37:06.740
that has to do with UFOs?
link |
01:37:08.940
That there's a kind of suspicion
link |
01:37:10.980
that the US government and governments in general
link |
01:37:13.580
are hiding stuff from us when you talk about UFOs.
link |
01:37:17.340
This is my view on that.
link |
01:37:18.900
If we declassified everything,
link |
01:37:20.940
I think we would find a lot more evidence
link |
01:37:22.900
all pointing toward the same puzzle.
link |
01:37:25.260
There aren't some alien men being held underground.
link |
01:37:28.180
There's not some secret file that lays out
link |
01:37:30.100
whatever is happening.
link |
01:37:32.220
I think the real lesson about government
link |
01:37:34.420
is government cannot bring itself to any new belief
link |
01:37:38.460
on this matter of any kind.
link |
01:37:40.580
And it's a kind of funny inertia.
link |
01:37:42.300
Like government is deeply puzzled.
link |
01:37:44.300
They're more puzzled than they want to admit to us,
link |
01:37:46.540
which I'm okay with that, actually.
link |
01:37:49.740
They shouldn't just be out panicking people in the streets.
link |
01:37:53.140
But at the end of the day,
link |
01:37:54.180
it's a bit like approving the AstraZeneca vaccine,
link |
01:37:57.220
which does work and they haven't approved it.
link |
01:37:59.060
When are they gonna do it?
link |
01:38:00.380
When is our government actually, if only internally,
link |
01:38:06.140
gonna take this more than just seriously,
link |
01:38:08.220
but take it truly seriously?
link |
01:38:10.380
And I just don't know if we have that capability,
link |
01:38:13.060
kind of mentally, to sound like Eric Weinstein
link |
01:38:15.820
for another moment.
link |
01:38:17.500
And to stay on the same topic,
link |
01:38:21.620
although on the surface shifting completely,
link |
01:38:25.100
because it is all the same topic.
link |
01:38:26.980
You have written and studied art.
link |
01:38:29.620
Why do you think we humans long to create art,
link |
01:38:34.740
human society in general and just the human mind?
link |
01:38:38.020
Well, most of us don't really long to create art, right?
link |
01:38:41.180
I would start with that point.
link |
01:38:43.860
You think so?
link |
01:38:45.100
You think that's a unique weirdness
link |
01:38:47.740
of some particular humans?
link |
01:38:49.940
I think, I don't know, 10% of humans roughly,
link |
01:38:52.900
which is a lot, but it is somewhat weird.
link |
01:38:56.780
I don't aspire to create art.
link |
01:38:58.860
You could say, like writing nonfiction,
link |
01:39:01.660
there's something art like about it,
link |
01:39:03.460
but it's a different urge, I would say.
link |
01:39:07.980
So why do some people have it?
link |
01:39:10.780
I think human brains are very different.
link |
01:39:13.180
It's a different notion of working through a problem.
link |
01:39:16.260
Like you and I enjoy working through analytic problems.
link |
01:39:20.220
For me, economics, for you, AI and other areas,
link |
01:39:22.620
or your humanities podcast, but that's fun.
link |
01:39:26.860
For that problem to be visual
link |
01:39:29.260
and linked to physical materials
link |
01:39:31.220
and putting those like on a canvas,
link |
01:39:34.300
to me, it's not a huge leap,
link |
01:39:36.260
but I really don't wanna do it.
link |
01:39:38.740
Like it would be pain.
link |
01:39:40.100
If you paid me like 500 bucks to spend an hour painting,
link |
01:39:45.540
I don't know, is that worth it?
link |
01:39:48.140
Maybe, but like, I'm happy when that hour's over.
link |
01:39:53.100
And would not be proud or happy with the result.
link |
01:39:55.540
It would suck.
link |
01:39:57.140
I don't think I would do it actually.
link |
01:39:59.740
Do you think you're suppressing some deep, I mean?
link |
01:40:02.940
Absolutely not.
link |
01:40:03.860
Now, when I was young, I played the guitar
link |
01:40:06.780
as you played the guitar and that I greatly enjoyed,
link |
01:40:09.020
although I was never good,
link |
01:40:11.060
but it helped me appreciate music much, much more.
link |
01:40:14.380
Well, this is the question.
link |
01:40:15.220
Okay, so from the perspective of the observer
link |
01:40:17.020
and appreciator of art, you said good.
link |
01:40:20.300
Is there such a concept as good in art?
link |
01:40:23.500
There's clearly a concept of bad.
link |
01:40:25.860
My guitar playing fit that concept.
link |
01:40:29.100
Okay.
link |
01:40:29.940
But I wasn't trying to be good.
link |
01:40:30.780
I wanted to learn like how do chords work?
link |
01:40:33.100
Okay, analytical.
link |
01:40:33.940
How does a jazz improvisation work?
link |
01:40:35.620
How is blues different?
link |
01:40:37.340
Classical guitar, sort of physically,
link |
01:40:39.380
how do you make those sounds?
link |
01:40:41.100
And I did learn those things.
link |
01:40:42.340
And you can't learn everything about them,
link |
01:40:44.780
but you can learn a lot about them without ever being good
link |
01:40:47.100
or even trying to be that good.
link |
01:40:48.700
But I could play all the notes.
link |
01:40:51.020
So from the observer perspective,
link |
01:40:53.140
what do you, I apologize for the absurd question,
link |
01:40:56.980
but what do you use the most beautiful
link |
01:40:58.740
and maybe moving piece of art you've encountered
link |
01:41:02.140
in your life?
link |
01:41:02.980
It's not an absurd question at all.
link |
01:41:05.780
And I think about this quite a bit.
link |
01:41:09.140
I would say the two winners by a clear margin
link |
01:41:13.060
are both by Michelangelo.
link |
01:41:15.140
It's the Pieta in the Vatican
link |
01:41:17.620
and the David statue in Florence.
link |
01:41:20.780
Why?
link |
01:41:21.620
Historical context or just purity, the creation itself?
link |
01:41:25.340
I don't think you can view it apart from historical context
link |
01:41:28.060
and being in Florence or in the Vatican,
link |
01:41:30.820
you're already primed for a lot, right?
link |
01:41:32.780
You can't pull that out.
link |
01:41:35.460
But just technically how they express
link |
01:41:37.780
the emotion of human form,
link |
01:41:40.060
I do honestly intellectually think
link |
01:41:42.180
they're the two greatest artworks for doing that.
link |
01:41:45.220
That's not all that art does.
link |
01:41:46.500
Not all art is about the human form,
link |
01:41:48.620
but they are phenomenal.
link |
01:41:51.140
And I think critical opinion, not that everyone agrees,
link |
01:41:54.300
but my view is not considered a crazy one
link |
01:41:57.300
within the broader court of critical opinion.
link |
01:41:58.940
Now in painting, I think the most I was ever blown away
link |
01:42:02.820
was to see Vermeer's artwork.
link |
01:42:05.420
It's called The Art of Painting and it's in Vienna
link |
01:42:09.020
in the Kunsthistorisches Museum.
link |
01:42:11.300
And I saw that, I think I was 23.
link |
01:42:15.260
It just stunned me because I'd seen reproductions,
link |
01:42:17.940
but live in front of you in huge,
link |
01:42:19.540
a completely different artwork.
link |
01:42:21.020
And again, Vienna, primed.
link |
01:42:23.460
Yes, and I was living abroad for the first time
link |
01:42:26.820
and Vienna itself, the city and so on.
link |
01:42:28.740
Now, unlike the Michelangelo's,
link |
01:42:30.300
that is not my current favorite painting,
link |
01:42:33.060
but that would be like historically the one I would pick.
link |
01:42:35.500
What do you make in the context of those choices?
link |
01:42:38.060
What do you make of modern art?
link |
01:42:39.700
And I apologize if I'm not using the correct terminology,
link |
01:42:44.660
but art that maybe goes another level of weird
link |
01:42:50.500
outside of the art that you've kind of mentioned
link |
01:42:52.940
and breaks all the conventions and rules and so on
link |
01:42:55.700
and becomes something else entirely
link |
01:42:59.420
that doesn't make sense in the same way
link |
01:43:02.620
that David might.
link |
01:43:03.860
I think a lot of it is phenomenal.
link |
01:43:05.660
And I would say the single biggest mistake
link |
01:43:07.740
that really smart people make is to think contemporary art
link |
01:43:12.300
or music for that matter is just a load of junk or rubbish.
link |
01:43:15.980
It's just like a kind of mathematics
link |
01:43:17.580
they haven't learned yet.
link |
01:43:18.780
It's really hard to learn.
link |
01:43:20.620
Maybe some people can never learn it,
link |
01:43:23.260
but there's a very large community of super smart,
link |
01:43:26.220
well educated people who spend their lives with it,
link |
01:43:28.820
who love it.
link |
01:43:29.700
Those are genuine pleasures.
link |
01:43:30.900
They understand it.
link |
01:43:31.740
They talk about it with the common language.
link |
01:43:34.260
And to think that somehow they're all frauds,
link |
01:43:36.100
it just isn't true.
link |
01:43:37.500
Like one doesn't have to like it oneself,
link |
01:43:40.100
just like Love House may or may not be your thing,
link |
01:43:42.340
but it is amazing and for me personally, highly rewarding.
link |
01:43:45.820
And if someone doesn't get it,
link |
01:43:47.980
I do kind of have the conceited response of thinking
link |
01:43:50.420
like in that area, I'm just smarter than you are.
link |
01:43:54.060
Yeah, so the interesting thing is as with most...
link |
01:43:56.860
We get back to Eric Weinstein again.
link |
01:43:58.580
Yes.
link |
01:43:59.420
He's in general smarter than I am, this I get.
link |
01:44:02.180
But when it comes to contemporary artistic creations,
link |
01:44:05.060
I'm smarter than he is.
link |
01:44:06.700
So he's not a fan of contemporary art?
link |
01:44:08.780
I don't want to speak for him.
link |
01:44:10.180
I've heard him say derogatory...
link |
01:44:11.500
He's evolving always.
link |
01:44:12.660
He's evolving always.
link |
01:44:13.780
I've heard him say derogatory things about some of it.
link |
01:44:16.180
Doesn't mean he doesn't love some other parts of it.
link |
01:44:18.740
So I wonder if there's just a higher learning curve,
link |
01:44:22.340
a steeper learning curve for contemporary art,
link |
01:44:24.820
meaning like it takes more work to appreciate the stories,
link |
01:44:28.660
the context from which they're like thinking about this work.
link |
01:44:32.420
It feels like in order to appreciate the art contemporary,
link |
01:44:36.180
certain pieces of contemporary art,
link |
01:44:37.660
you have to know the story better behind the art.
link |
01:44:41.260
I think that's true for many people,
link |
01:44:42.860
but I think it's a funny shape distribution
link |
01:44:45.420
because there's a whole other set of people.
link |
01:44:47.780
Sometimes they're small children
link |
01:44:49.460
and they get abstract art more easily.
link |
01:44:51.740
You show them Vermeer or Rembrandt, they don't get it.
link |
01:44:56.380
But just like a wall of color, they're in love with it.
link |
01:45:00.340
So I don't think I know the full story.
link |
01:45:03.100
Again, some strange kind of distribution.
link |
01:45:04.740
The entry barriers are super high or super low,
link |
01:45:07.820
but not that often in between.
link |
01:45:11.100
But you would challenge saying
link |
01:45:12.780
that there's a lot to be explored in contemporary art.
link |
01:45:15.420
It's just you need to learn.
link |
01:45:20.420
Yeah, it's one of the most profound bodies
link |
01:45:22.380
of human thought out there.
link |
01:45:24.060
And it's part of the humanities.
link |
01:45:26.460
And yes, there are people who also don't like podcasts,
link |
01:45:28.540
right?
link |
01:45:30.540
And that's fine.
link |
01:45:31.380
Yeah.
link |
01:45:32.540
You've also been a scholar of food.
link |
01:45:35.500
We're just going through the entirety
link |
01:45:37.060
of the human experience today on this humanities podcast.
link |
01:45:42.620
Another absurd question, say this conversation
link |
01:45:45.460
is the last thing you ever do in your life.
link |
01:45:47.100
I, wearing the suit, would murder you
link |
01:45:49.460
at the end of the conversation.
link |
01:45:50.660
So this is your last day on earth,
link |
01:45:52.660
but I would offer you a last meal.
link |
01:45:54.540
What would that meal contain?
link |
01:45:57.220
We can also travel to other parts of the world.
link |
01:45:59.340
Well, we have to travel
link |
01:46:00.340
because my preferred last meal here,
link |
01:46:03.420
I probably had like two nights ago.
link |
01:46:05.820
Which is what?
link |
01:46:06.900
Can you describe or no?
link |
01:46:08.580
The best restaurant around here is called Mama Chang's
link |
01:46:11.300
and it's in Fairfax and it's food from Wuhan actually.
link |
01:46:16.100
And they take pandemic safety seriously
link |
01:46:18.420
in addition to the food being very good.
link |
01:46:20.420
But this is what I would do.
link |
01:46:23.060
I would fly to Hermosillo in Northern Mexico,
link |
01:46:27.460
which has some of the best food in Mexico,
link |
01:46:29.180
but I sadly only had two days there.
link |
01:46:31.980
So somewhere like Oaxaca, Puebla,
link |
01:46:35.020
I think they have food just as good
link |
01:46:37.500
or some people would say better,
link |
01:46:38.820
but I've spent a lot of time in those places.
link |
01:46:41.220
So the scarce, wait, is it possible the scarcity of time
link |
01:46:44.340
contributed to the richness of the experience?
link |
01:46:46.660
Of course, but the point is that scarcity still holds.
link |
01:46:50.020
So I want one more dose of the food from Hermosillo.
link |
01:46:53.380
Can you describe what the food is?
link |
01:46:55.620
It's the one kind of Mexican food that at least nominally
link |
01:46:58.180
is just like the Mexican food you get in the US.
link |
01:47:00.740
So there are burritos, there's fajitas.
link |
01:47:02.860
It doesn't taste at all like our stuff.
link |
01:47:05.420
But again, nominally, it's the part of Mexican food
link |
01:47:08.180
that made it into the US was then transformed.
link |
01:47:11.380
But it's in a way the most familiar.
link |
01:47:14.420
But for that reason, it's the most radical
link |
01:47:16.220
because you have to rethink all these things you know
link |
01:47:18.700
and they're way better in Hermosillo.
link |
01:47:21.140
Hardly any tourists go there.
link |
01:47:22.580
Like there's nothing to see in Hermosillo.
link |
01:47:24.860
Nothing you do other than eat.
link |
01:47:26.820
It's not ruined by any outsiders.
link |
01:47:29.340
It's this longstanding tradition, dirt cheap.
link |
01:47:33.060
And the thing to do there is just sweet talk a taxi driver
link |
01:47:36.340
into first taking you seriously
link |
01:47:38.580
and then trusting you enough to know that you trust him
link |
01:47:41.900
to bring you to the very best like food stands.
link |
01:47:44.820
So where's the magic of that nominally similar
link |
01:47:51.900
entity of the burrito?
link |
01:47:53.500
Where's the magic come from?
link |
01:47:55.220
Is it the taxi ride?
link |
01:47:56.780
Is it the whole experience
link |
01:47:57.980
or is there something actually in the food?
link |
01:47:59.940
So well, you can break the food down part by part.
link |
01:48:02.340
So if you think of the beef,
link |
01:48:04.020
the beef there will be dry aged just out in the air
link |
01:48:07.500
in a way the FDA here would never permit.
link |
01:48:10.660
Like they dry age it till it turns green,
link |
01:48:12.540
but it is phenomenal.
link |
01:48:14.460
The quality of the chilies.
link |
01:48:16.380
So here there's only a small number
link |
01:48:17.820
of kinds of chilies you can get.
link |
01:48:19.740
In most parts of Mexico,
link |
01:48:21.700
there's quite a large number of chilies you can get.
link |
01:48:24.220
They're different, they're fresher,
link |
01:48:26.140
but it's just like a different thing.
link |
01:48:27.980
The chilies, the wheat used.
link |
01:48:32.260
So this is wheat territory, not corn territory,
link |
01:48:34.740
which is a self interesting.
link |
01:48:37.460
The wheat is more diverse and more complex.
link |
01:48:39.740
Here it's more homogenized, obviously cheaper,
link |
01:48:42.300
more efficient, but there it is better.
link |
01:48:45.860
Non pasteurized cheeses are legal in all parts of Mexico
link |
01:48:50.220
and they can be white and gooey and amazing
link |
01:48:52.900
in a way that here again, it's just against the law.
link |
01:48:55.660
You could legalize them.
link |
01:48:56.620
The demand wouldn't be that great.
link |
01:48:57.780
There's a black market in these cheeses
link |
01:48:59.300
that Latino groceries around here,
link |
01:49:01.620
but you just can't get that much of it.
link |
01:49:03.420
So the cheese, the meat, the wheat,
link |
01:49:06.660
all different in significant ways.
link |
01:49:09.300
The chilies, I don't think the onions really matter much.
link |
01:49:13.100
Garlic, I don't know.
link |
01:49:14.060
I wouldn't put much stock in that,
link |
01:49:16.700
but that's a lot of the core food
link |
01:49:18.700
and then it's cooked much better
link |
01:49:20.020
and everything's super fresh.
link |
01:49:22.340
The food chain is not relying on refrigeration.
link |
01:49:25.300
And this is one thing Russia and US have in common.
link |
01:49:28.660
We were early pioneers in food refrigeration
link |
01:49:31.540
and that made a lot of our foods worse quite early.
link |
01:49:34.260
And it took us a long time to dig out of that
link |
01:49:37.260
because big countries, right?
link |
01:49:39.380
You've had an extensive rail system in Russia,
link |
01:49:42.420
USSR a long time, which makes it easier to freeze
link |
01:49:45.740
and then ship.
link |
01:49:47.580
What about the actual cooking, the chef?
link |
01:49:50.580
Is there an artistry to the simple?
link |
01:49:53.780
I hesitate to call the burrito simple, but.
link |
01:49:57.060
And there's no brain drain out of cooking.
link |
01:49:58.740
So if you're in the United States and you're very talented,
link |
01:50:03.460
I'm not saying there aren't talented chefs.
link |
01:50:05.260
Of course there are,
link |
01:50:06.780
but there's so many other things to pull people away.
link |
01:50:09.620
But in Mexico, there's so much talent going into food
link |
01:50:12.300
as there is in China,
link |
01:50:14.100
which would be another candidate for last meal questions.
link |
01:50:17.460
Or India.
link |
01:50:18.500
Or, oh, India, let's not even get started on India.
link |
01:50:21.340
Unbelievable.
link |
01:50:23.220
You've also, I mean, there's a million things
link |
01:50:24.740
we could talk about here,
link |
01:50:25.580
but you've written about your own dreams of sushi.
link |
01:50:28.700
It's just a really clean, good example
link |
01:50:30.620
that people are aware of of mastery
link |
01:50:33.700
in the art of the simple in food.
link |
01:50:39.420
What do you make of that kind of obsessive pursuit
link |
01:50:41.460
of perfection in creating simple food?
link |
01:50:45.020
Sushi is about perfection,
link |
01:50:46.780
but it's a bit like the Beatles White album,
link |
01:50:48.420
which people think is simple and not overproduced.
link |
01:50:51.540
It's in a funny way their most overproduced album,
link |
01:50:54.340
but it's produced just perfectly.
link |
01:50:55.980
It sounds simple.
link |
01:50:57.260
It's really hard to produce music to the point
link |
01:50:59.860
where it's gonna sound so simple and not sound like sludge.
link |
01:51:03.140
Like Let It Be album, it has some great songs,
link |
01:51:06.140
but a lot of it sounds like sludge.
link |
01:51:07.700
One After 909, that's sludge.
link |
01:51:09.780
I Dig A Pony, it's sludge.
link |
01:51:11.580
Like it's a bit interesting.
link |
01:51:13.020
It's not that good.
link |
01:51:13.860
It doesn't sound that good.
link |
01:51:15.740
White album, like the best half, like Dear Prudence,
link |
01:51:18.140
sounds perfect, sounds simple.
link |
01:51:20.020
Cry Baby Cry, it's not simple.
link |
01:51:21.940
Back in the USSR, super complex.
link |
01:51:25.180
So sushi is like that.
link |
01:51:26.900
It's because it's so incredibly not simple
link |
01:51:29.580
starting with the rice.
link |
01:51:31.540
You try to refine it to make it appear super simple,
link |
01:51:34.420
and that's the most complex thing of all.
link |
01:51:37.020
So do you admire,
link |
01:51:39.300
I mean, we're not talking about days, weeks, months.
link |
01:51:43.900
We're talking about years, generations
link |
01:51:46.540
of doing the same thing over and over and over again.
link |
01:51:49.260
Do you admire that kind of sticking to the,
link |
01:51:53.020
we talked about our admiration of the weird.
link |
01:51:56.060
That doesn't feel weird.
link |
01:51:57.540
That seems like discipline and dedication
link |
01:52:01.420
to like a stoic minimalism or something like that.
link |
01:52:05.300
I'm happy they do it, but I actually feel bad about it.
link |
01:52:07.940
I feel they're sacrificial victims to me,
link |
01:52:10.860
which I benefit from.
link |
01:52:12.620
But don't you ever think like,
link |
01:52:13.740
gee, you're a great master sushi chef.
link |
01:52:16.900
Wouldn't you be happier if you did something else?
link |
01:52:21.780
Doesn't seem to happen.
link |
01:52:23.500
That might be something that a weird mind would think.
link |
01:52:25.700
Maybe it is weird people,
link |
01:52:27.260
and maybe they're really enjoying it,
link |
01:52:29.820
but like to learn how to pack rice for 10 years
link |
01:52:32.820
before they let you do anything else.
link |
01:52:35.180
It's like these Indian, you know, sarod players.
link |
01:52:37.820
They just spent five years tapping out rhythms
link |
01:52:40.380
before they're allowed to touch their instruments.
link |
01:52:43.420
Well, actually to defend that.
link |
01:52:46.220
It's kind of like graduate school, right?
link |
01:52:48.460
Well, I think graduate school, perhaps.
link |
01:52:53.700
Graduate school is full of,
link |
01:52:54.860
like every single day is full of surprises, I would say.
link |
01:53:00.260
I did martial arts for a long time.
link |
01:53:01.940
I do martial arts, and I've always loved,
link |
01:53:04.380
it's kind of the Russian way of drilling,
link |
01:53:06.900
is doing the same technique.
link |
01:53:09.180
I don't know if this applies
link |
01:53:10.500
into intellectual or academic disciplines,
link |
01:53:13.220
where you can do the same thing over and over and over again,
link |
01:53:16.940
thousands and thousands and thousands of times.
link |
01:53:19.940
What I've discovered through that process
link |
01:53:23.620
is you get to start to appreciate the tiniest of details
link |
01:53:27.260
and find the beauty in them.
link |
01:53:29.420
People who go to like monasteries to meditate
link |
01:53:32.020
talk about this, is when you just sit in silence
link |
01:53:35.620
and don't do anything,
link |
01:53:37.420
you start to appreciate how much complexity and beauty
link |
01:53:41.340
there is in just the movement of a finger.
link |
01:53:43.060
Like you can spend the whole day joyously thinking about
link |
01:53:47.100
how fun it is to move a finger.
link |
01:53:49.540
And then you can almost become your full weird self
link |
01:53:54.700
about the tiniest details of life.
link |
01:53:56.940
As a thing, you've got to wonder,
link |
01:53:57.980
like, is there a free lunch in there?
link |
01:53:59.780
Are the rest of us moving around too much?
link |
01:54:01.900
Yeah, exactly.
link |
01:54:04.060
They sure feel like they found a free lunch.
link |
01:54:06.620
The people meditate, they're onto something.
link |
01:54:09.180
I tend to think it's like artists,
link |
01:54:11.260
that some percent of people are like that,
link |
01:54:13.420
but most are not.
link |
01:54:14.740
And for most of us, there's no free lunch.
link |
01:54:16.820
Like my free lunch is to move around a lot.
link |
01:54:19.100
In search of lunch, in fact.
link |
01:54:20.820
Well, with all the food talk, you made me hungry.
link |
01:54:24.460
What books, three or so books,
link |
01:54:29.100
if any come to mind, technical fiction, philosophical,
link |
01:54:33.500
would you recommend, had a big impact on you,
link |
01:54:37.340
or you just drew some insights from throughout your life?
link |
01:54:40.420
Well, two of them we've already discussed.
link |
01:54:42.340
One is Plato's Dialogues,
link |
01:54:44.740
which I started reading when I was like 13.
link |
01:54:47.620
Another is Ayn Rand, Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal.
link |
01:54:51.100
But I would say the Friedrich Hayek essay,
link |
01:54:53.860
The Use of Knowledge in Society,
link |
01:54:56.260
which is about how decentralized mechanisms can work,
link |
01:54:58.940
also why they might go wrong.
link |
01:55:01.060
And that's where you start to understand
link |
01:55:03.260
the price system, capitalism.
link |
01:55:05.220
And that was in a book called
link |
01:55:06.300
Individualism and Economic Order,
link |
01:55:08.020
but it was just a few essays in that book.
link |
01:55:10.580
Those are maybe the three I would cite.
link |
01:55:12.700
Can you elaborate a little bit on the...
link |
01:55:14.580
Say the price of copper goes up, right?
link |
01:55:16.380
Because there's a problem with the copper mine
link |
01:55:18.540
in Chile or Bolivia.
link |
01:55:20.660
So the price of copper goes up.
link |
01:55:21.980
All around the world, people are led to economize copper,
link |
01:55:24.860
to look for substitutes for copper,
link |
01:55:26.740
to change their production processes,
link |
01:55:28.860
to change the goods and services they buy,
link |
01:55:31.100
to build homes a different way.
link |
01:55:33.900
And this one event creates
link |
01:55:35.500
this one tiny change in information.
link |
01:55:38.100
This gets into your AI work very directly.
link |
01:55:41.220
And how much complexity that one change engenders
link |
01:55:44.780
in a meaningful, coherent way,
link |
01:55:47.140
how the different pieces of the price system fit together.
link |
01:55:50.780
Hayek really laid out very clearly.
link |
01:55:53.940
And it's like an AI problem.
link |
01:55:56.340
And how well, not for everything,
link |
01:55:57.980
but for many things, we solve that AI problem.
link |
01:56:00.900
I learned, I was, I think 13, maybe 14 when I read Hayek.
link |
01:56:04.780
Yeah, the distributed nature of things there.
link |
01:56:07.300
And it's like your work on human attention,
link |
01:56:09.100
like how much can we take in?
link |
01:56:10.580
Yes.
link |
01:56:11.620
Very often not that much.
link |
01:56:13.780
And how many of the advances of modern civilization
link |
01:56:16.460
you need to understand as a response to that constraint.
link |
01:56:19.500
I got that also from Hayek.
link |
01:56:21.260
And what's the title of the book again?
link |
01:56:23.900
It's reprinted in a lot of books at this point.
link |
01:56:26.060
But back then the book was called
link |
01:56:27.500
Individualism and Economic Order.
link |
01:56:30.460
But the essay is online.
link |
01:56:31.700
Hayek, Use of Knowledge in Society.
link |
01:56:34.500
There are open access versions of it through Google.
link |
01:56:37.300
And you don't need the whole book.
link |
01:56:39.020
So it's a very good book.
link |
01:56:40.340
Again, one of those profound looking over the ocean,
link |
01:56:46.140
maybe sitting on a porch,
link |
01:56:47.860
maybe with a drink of some kind.
link |
01:56:50.940
And a young kid comes by and asks you for advice.
link |
01:56:55.020
What advice would you give to?
link |
01:56:56.620
A drink.
link |
01:56:57.460
That's my advice.
link |
01:56:58.620
I'm serious.
link |
01:57:00.700
So, okay, after that,
link |
01:57:05.780
what advice would you give to a young person today
link |
01:57:09.420
as they take on life?
link |
01:57:10.900
Whether a career in academia in general or just a life,
link |
01:57:15.900
which is probably more important than career.
link |
01:57:19.340
Most good advice is context specific.
link |
01:57:22.060
But here are my two generic pieces of advice.
link |
01:57:24.540
Good.
link |
01:57:25.380
First, get a mentor.
link |
01:57:27.180
Both career, but anything you wanna learn.
link |
01:57:29.100
Like say you wanna learn about contemporary art.
link |
01:57:31.580
People write me this.
link |
01:57:33.060
Oh, what book should I read?
link |
01:57:34.380
It's probably not gonna work that way.
link |
01:57:36.420
You need a mentor.
link |
01:57:37.260
Yes, you should read some books on it.
link |
01:57:39.140
But you want a mentor to help you frame them,
link |
01:57:40.820
take you around to some art, talk about it with you.
link |
01:57:43.900
So get as many mentors as you can
link |
01:57:45.580
in the things you wanna learn.
link |
01:57:47.660
And then...
link |
01:57:48.500
Can I ask you a quick tangent on that?
link |
01:57:52.580
Presumably a good mentor.
link |
01:57:54.380
Of course.
link |
01:57:55.220
Is there...
link |
01:57:56.060
I'm begging the question in there.
link |
01:57:56.900
It's complicated, right?
link |
01:57:59.220
Well, it is complicated.
link |
01:58:00.300
Is there a lot of damage to be done from a bad mentor?
link |
01:58:03.380
I don't think that much
link |
01:58:04.300
because it's very easy to drop mentors.
link |
01:58:06.020
And in fact, it's quite hard to maintain them.
link |
01:58:07.980
Good mentors tend to be busy.
link |
01:58:09.620
Bad mentors tend to be busy.
link |
01:58:12.820
And you can try on mentors
link |
01:58:14.260
and maybe they're not good for you,
link |
01:58:15.460
but there's a good chance you'll learn something.
link |
01:58:19.460
Like I had a mentor, I was an undergrad.
link |
01:58:21.060
He was a Stalinist.
link |
01:58:22.620
He edited the book called The Essential Stalin.
link |
01:58:24.700
Brilliant guy.
link |
01:58:25.740
I learned a tremendous amount from him.
link |
01:58:28.220
Was he like as a Stalinist a good mentor for me?
link |
01:58:30.660
Fan of Hayek?
link |
01:58:31.500
Well, no.
link |
01:58:32.500
But for a year it was tremendous.
link |
01:58:34.180
Yeah.
link |
01:58:38.220
He introduced me like to Soviet
link |
01:58:40.180
and Eastern European science fiction
link |
01:58:41.780
because he was a Marxist.
link |
01:58:43.500
Like that's what I took from him among other things.
link |
01:58:45.420
Any advice on finding a good mentor?
link |
01:58:47.700
Daniel Kahneman has...
link |
01:58:50.980
Somebody just popped this to mind
link |
01:58:52.700
as somebody who was able to find
link |
01:58:54.300
exceptionally good collaborators throughout his life.
link |
01:58:57.100
There's not many bright minds that find collaborators.
link |
01:59:00.380
They often, which I ultimately see what a mentor is.
link |
01:59:06.420
Yeah.
link |
01:59:07.260
Be interesting, be direct and try.
link |
01:59:10.180
It's not like a perfect formula,
link |
01:59:11.660
but it's amazing how many people
link |
01:59:12.940
don't even do those things.
link |
01:59:14.220
Be interesting, be direct and try.
link |
01:59:17.540
Like what you want from a better known person,
link |
01:59:20.140
I would just say be very direct with them.
link |
01:59:22.220
Yeah.
link |
01:59:23.940
Beautiful.
link |
01:59:24.780
What's the second piece of advice?
link |
01:59:26.540
Build small groups of peers.
link |
01:59:29.300
They don't have to be your age,
link |
01:59:30.740
but very often they'll be your age,
link |
01:59:32.340
especially if you're younger
link |
01:59:33.820
with broadly similar interests,
link |
01:59:35.380
but there can be different points of view.
link |
01:59:37.260
People you hang out with,
link |
01:59:38.980
which can include in a WhatsApp group online
link |
01:59:41.780
and like every day or almost every day,
link |
01:59:43.860
they're talking about the thing you care about,
link |
01:59:46.180
trying to solve problems in that thing.
link |
01:59:48.780
And that's your small group and you really like them
link |
01:59:51.060
and they like you and you care
link |
01:59:52.260
what you think about each other
link |
01:59:53.940
and you have this common interest.
link |
01:59:55.860
That's for human connection
link |
01:59:57.220
or that's for development of ideas?
link |
01:59:58.860
It's both, they're not that different.
link |
02:00:01.380
Like Beatles, classic small group, right?
link |
02:00:05.220
But there's so much drama.
link |
02:00:06.580
The Florentine artists, of course there's drama
link |
02:00:08.540
and small groups tend to split up, which is fine,
link |
02:00:10.900
just like entering relationships off an end.
link |
02:00:14.180
But it's remarkable how little has been done
link |
02:00:16.900
that was not done in small groups in some way.
link |
02:00:19.940
So speaking of loss of beautiful relationships,
link |
02:00:24.940
where do you make this whole love thing?
link |
02:00:29.260
Why do humans fall in love?
link |
02:00:31.620
What's the role of love, friendship, family in life?
link |
02:00:37.420
In a successful life or just life in general?
link |
02:00:40.020
Why the hell are we so into this thing?
link |
02:00:42.100
There are multiple layers of understanding that question.
link |
02:00:44.820
So kind of the lowest layer is the Darwinian answer, right?
link |
02:00:48.660
If we weren't this way,
link |
02:00:50.340
we wouldn't have been successful
link |
02:00:51.700
in reproducing and building alliances.
link |
02:00:54.420
It's important to realize that's far from complete.
link |
02:00:57.580
Sort of the highest understanding would be poetic,
link |
02:00:59.940
like read John Keats or many other love poets.
link |
02:01:03.620
So who do I go to to find out,
link |
02:01:05.540
to learn about love in terms of poets or?
link |
02:01:07.980
I would say start with John Keats.
link |
02:01:10.020
But given that you're fluent in Russian.
link |
02:01:13.740
Yeah, let's go Russian literature for a second.
link |
02:01:16.060
Like you keep mentioning Russia.
link |
02:01:18.580
What's your connection?
link |
02:01:21.180
What's your love in Russia?
link |
02:01:25.100
Well, first it's all interesting,
link |
02:01:26.380
but more concretely, my wife was born in Moscow.
link |
02:01:29.340
So Kolniki was her neighborhood.
link |
02:01:31.460
Yeah.
link |
02:01:32.300
Wow.
link |
02:01:33.140
And she grew up there.
link |
02:01:34.180
I married her here.
link |
02:01:36.740
My daughter, I adopted her.
link |
02:01:38.340
I'm not her biological father, but I genuinely raised her.
link |
02:01:41.260
She was born in Russia,
link |
02:01:42.540
though she came here when she was one.
link |
02:01:45.500
My father in law.
link |
02:01:46.340
So you're basically Russian.
link |
02:01:47.260
No, no, no.
link |
02:01:48.100
I'm a New Jersey boy.
link |
02:01:49.180
That's the same thing.
link |
02:01:51.140
I'm very sorry to report.
link |
02:01:52.220
My father in law passed away a week ago.
link |
02:01:54.820
He lived with us for six years.
link |
02:01:57.300
He lived in Russia till he was, oh, 70.
link |
02:02:01.460
Saw Stalinist error.
link |
02:02:04.180
His father was brought to a camp,
link |
02:02:05.820
lived through World War II.
link |
02:02:07.780
Much, much more.
link |
02:02:09.580
Had an incredible life.
link |
02:02:11.820
Never really learned how to speak English.
link |
02:02:14.500
So I absorbed something Russian from him as well.
link |
02:02:17.940
He was part Armenian.
link |
02:02:20.260
So that's my connection to Russia.
link |
02:02:21.980
A bit of the Russian soul, too.
link |
02:02:24.060
Do you?
link |
02:02:24.900
I don't think I have it.
link |
02:02:25.740
I think I appreciate it.
link |
02:02:27.580
But there's division of labor, right?
link |
02:02:29.020
Others in the family.
link |
02:02:31.380
Take care of that.
link |
02:02:32.220
I'm more superficial.
link |
02:02:34.180
You mentioned Keats and that higher version,
link |
02:02:36.940
that non Darwinian love.
link |
02:02:38.420
What's that about?
link |
02:02:39.700
That it's the highest form of human connection
link |
02:02:42.340
and it's intoxicating and it's part of building a life.
link |
02:02:46.860
And most of us are very, very strongly drawn to it.
link |
02:02:50.340
And it's part of the highest realization
link |
02:02:52.540
of you being what you can be.
link |
02:02:54.660
Yeah.
link |
02:02:56.580
He mentioned you lost.
link |
02:02:57.540
But ask a Russian.
link |
02:02:58.380
I mean, this is a superficial New Jersey boy
link |
02:03:01.460
who grew up listening to Bruce Springsteen
link |
02:03:03.820
and that was his romanticism.
link |
02:03:05.620
What's your favorite Bruce Springsteen song?
link |
02:03:09.580
I think the album Born to Run has actually held up the best.
link |
02:03:14.100
Though it's very fashionable to think
link |
02:03:15.900
the earlier or later works are actually better.
link |
02:03:18.340
And that's the overproduced super pop album.
link |
02:03:21.100
But the quality of the songs,
link |
02:03:22.380
to me Born to Run is just far and away the best.
link |
02:03:25.380
Then Darkness on the Edge of Town.
link |
02:03:27.540
And those are still my favorites.
link |
02:03:29.860
Born to Run is an incredible song.
link |
02:03:33.060
And perfectly produced in a Phil Spector kind of way.
link |
02:03:36.460
Every detail is right.
link |
02:03:38.020
Every lyric.
link |
02:03:39.220
What else is on the album?
link |
02:03:40.580
Thunder Road, Jungle Land, Tenth Avenue, Freeze Out.
link |
02:03:43.540
She's the one, unbelievable.
link |
02:03:46.620
Yeah, Bruce is amazing.
link |
02:03:47.460
Leading across the river.
link |
02:03:48.900
I really like when he goes into love personally.
link |
02:03:55.860
Like I'm on fire.
link |
02:03:57.780
That's a very good song, Dancing in the Dark.
link |
02:04:00.340
A lot of the later work,
link |
02:04:01.420
I find the percussion becomes too simple
link |
02:04:04.020
and kind of too white somehow.
link |
02:04:06.740
And a little clunky.
link |
02:04:08.100
And it's still good work.
link |
02:04:09.580
He's super talented, but it doesn't speak to me.
link |
02:04:12.820
But when it all bursts open into the open road,
link |
02:04:16.020
like it does on Born to Run, that's magic.
link |
02:04:19.660
Yeah.
link |
02:04:20.500
Or Rosalita.
link |
02:04:21.340
Have you ever seen him live?
link |
02:04:23.980
Yes, twice.
link |
02:04:26.140
I wonder what he's like live when he was young, right?
link |
02:04:28.620
Those years.
link |
02:04:29.460
I saw him live when he was young.
link |
02:04:31.220
I was young.
link |
02:04:32.980
New Jersey.
link |
02:04:34.460
I was a little disappointed actually.
link |
02:04:37.260
I think what I like best from him is quite studio.
link |
02:04:41.180
He certainly played well.
link |
02:04:42.260
I don't fault his performance.
link |
02:04:44.060
But it's like when I saw Plant and Page of Led Zeppelin.
link |
02:04:47.580
Tremendous creators.
link |
02:04:48.980
And they showed up.
link |
02:04:49.820
They were not drunk.
link |
02:04:50.660
Like they were paying attention.
link |
02:04:52.140
But I was underwhelmed.
link |
02:04:54.060
Because Led Zeppelin, like the Beatles White album,
link |
02:04:56.660
is much more of a studio band than you think at first.
link |
02:04:59.740
And in the case of Bruce Springsteen,
link |
02:05:01.220
I don't know about you, but for me,
link |
02:05:03.220
he's somebody that I connect with the most
link |
02:05:05.940
when I'm alone and there's like a melancholy feeling.
link |
02:05:10.100
And actually, my folks live in Philly.
link |
02:05:12.620
I went to school in Philly.
link |
02:05:14.860
And so, you know, I've, I think I've.
link |
02:05:18.420
You're almost worthy of New Jersey then.
link |
02:05:20.020
Yeah, well you're, you're almost worthy of Russia.
link |
02:05:24.020
So we're, we can connect.
link |
02:05:27.260
And then ask, but I mean, I love Jersey.
link |
02:05:28.580
This is something I feel like, I feel like, I don't know.
link |
02:05:34.660
It's always, there's this beautiful,
link |
02:05:36.660
like there's a diner, Olga's Diner that closed down.
link |
02:05:39.020
I used to go there.
link |
02:05:41.540
There's, there's a melancholy feeling to me.
link |
02:05:43.860
I mean, of course.
link |
02:05:44.700
A thickness to culture in that part of the world.
link |
02:05:47.780
Which is oddly similar to some elements
link |
02:05:49.940
of the thickness of Russian culture.
link |
02:05:51.940
And when you see like Russian characters on the Sopranos,
link |
02:05:55.580
it totally makes sense,
link |
02:05:56.700
even though there are these complete outliers.
link |
02:05:59.460
Exactly, it totally makes sense.
link |
02:06:01.820
You've, you mentioned you lost your father in law last week.
link |
02:06:06.180
Do you think about mortality?
link |
02:06:09.580
Do you think about your own mortality?
link |
02:06:12.420
Are you afraid of death?
link |
02:06:14.820
I don't think about my own mortality that much,
link |
02:06:17.300
which is probably a good thing.
link |
02:06:19.900
I think death will be bad.
link |
02:06:22.340
I wouldn't say I'm afraid of it.
link |
02:06:23.900
For me, the worst thing about death
link |
02:06:25.420
is not knowing how the human story turns out.
link |
02:06:28.660
The full human story.
link |
02:06:29.780
The full human story.
link |
02:06:30.660
So if I could, right before I die,
link |
02:06:32.780
read like a Wikipedia page called The Rest of Human History
link |
02:06:36.500
and have enough time, just like a few days,
link |
02:06:38.220
to absorb it, think about it,
link |
02:06:40.220
and know like, oh, well 643 years from now,
link |
02:06:43.220
that's when all the atomic weapons went off
link |
02:06:45.060
and here's what happened between now and then,
link |
02:06:47.900
I would feel much better dying.
link |
02:06:52.180
But that's not how it's gonna be, right?
link |
02:06:54.100
That's unlikely.
link |
02:06:55.020
It's almost like the Hitchhiker's Guide,
link |
02:06:57.020
they kind of have, what is it?
link |
02:06:58.780
They have a one or two sentence description of the human,
link |
02:07:01.900
of what goes on on Earth.
link |
02:07:03.580
It's kind of interesting to think
link |
02:07:05.020
if there's a lot of intelligent civilizations out there
link |
02:07:07.980
that in the big encyclopedia that describes the universe,
link |
02:07:10.980
humans will only have one sentence, maybe two.
link |
02:07:13.660
Probably true.
link |
02:07:15.100
Yeah.
link |
02:07:15.940
But it's the only one I can read and understand, right?
link |
02:07:18.620
And it may be hard to understand the human one
link |
02:07:20.740
past a number of centuries.
link |
02:07:22.860
Yeah, with AI, yes.
link |
02:07:26.420
Like how many years from now will reading Wikipedia
link |
02:07:29.060
be like trying to read Chaucer,
link |
02:07:31.140
which I almost can do, but I actually can't.
link |
02:07:33.380
I need a translation.
link |
02:07:34.860
Probably you can't do it at all.
link |
02:07:36.380
Yeah.
link |
02:07:37.580
I mean, maybe reading will be outdated.
link |
02:07:39.380
It might be a very silly notion.
link |
02:07:41.660
Maybe we're fundamentally,
link |
02:07:43.540
like we think language is fundamental to cognition,
link |
02:07:46.060
but it could be something visual
link |
02:07:47.380
or something totally different that we'll plug in.
link |
02:07:50.260
Neuralink or, yeah.
link |
02:07:53.500
But in that story, that Wikipedia article,
link |
02:07:55.820
do you think there'll be a section on the meaning of it?
link |
02:08:00.940
I hope not, because that section we could write now,
link |
02:08:04.780
and it's just not going to be very good, right?
link |
02:08:07.220
What would you put in the section
link |
02:08:08.580
on the meaning of human existence?
link |
02:08:11.620
I don't know, links to a lot of other sections?
link |
02:08:15.940
I don't think there are general statements
link |
02:08:17.380
about the meaning of life that have that much meaning.
link |
02:08:19.860
I think if you study different cultures,
link |
02:08:21.980
the arts, travel, mathematics,
link |
02:08:23.780
like whatever your thing is,
link |
02:08:25.420
you'll get a lot about the meaning of life.
link |
02:08:27.220
So like it's there in Wikipedia in some bigger sense.
link |
02:08:30.660
But I don't want to read the page on the meaning.
link |
02:08:32.180
I bet they have such a page, in fact.
link |
02:08:34.300
The fact that I've never visited it,
link |
02:08:36.020
none of my friends, oh, here, Tyler,
link |
02:08:37.740
here's the page on the meaning of life.
link |
02:08:39.100
I know you've been wondering about this.
link |
02:08:40.340
You got to read this one.
link |
02:08:41.580
No one's ever done that to you, have they?
link |
02:08:43.300
It probably has, well, I've actually gone to that page.
link |
02:08:46.020
It does, in fact, have a lot of links to other pages.
link |
02:08:48.500
Okay.
link |
02:08:51.020
So that's it.
link |
02:08:52.540
The meaning of life is just a bunch of self referential
link |
02:08:57.180
or citation needed type of statements.
link |
02:09:02.260
I think there's no better way to end it.
link |
02:09:03.860
Tyler, it's a huge honor.
link |
02:09:05.100
I'm a huge fan.
link |
02:09:07.500
Thank you so much for wasting all of this time with me.
link |
02:09:10.060
It was one of the greatest conversations I've ever had.
link |
02:09:11.980
Thank you so much.
link |
02:09:12.820
My pleasure and delighted to finally have met you
link |
02:09:15.220
and that we can do this.
link |
02:09:17.740
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Tyler Cowen
link |
02:09:20.260
and thank you to Linode, ExpressVPN,
link |
02:09:23.580
SimpliSafe and Public Goods.
link |
02:09:25.940
Check them out in the description to support this podcast.
link |
02:09:29.580
And now let me leave you with some words from Adam Smith.
link |
02:09:33.660
Little else is requisite to carry a state
link |
02:09:36.580
to the highest degree of opulence
link |
02:09:38.580
from the lowest barbarism but peace, easy taxes
link |
02:09:42.660
and a tolerable administration of justice.
link |
02:09:45.900
Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.