back to index

Niall Ferguson: History of Money, Power, War, and Truth | Lex Fridman Podcast #239


small model | large model

link |
00:00:00.000
The following is a conversation with Neil Ferguson,
link |
00:00:02.640
one of the great historians of our time,
link |
00:00:04.960
at times controversial and always brilliant,
link |
00:00:07.660
whether you agree with him or not.
link |
00:00:09.760
He's an author of 16 books on topics covering
link |
00:00:13.840
the history of money, power, war, pandemics, and empire.
link |
00:00:18.440
Previously at Harvard, currently at Stanford,
link |
00:00:21.360
and today launching a new university here in Austin, Texas
link |
00:00:25.920
called the University of Austin,
link |
00:00:28.680
a new institution built from the ground up
link |
00:00:31.840
to encourage open inquiry and discourse
link |
00:00:34.520
by both thinkers and doers,
link |
00:00:36.240
from philosophers and historians
link |
00:00:38.120
to scientists and engineers,
link |
00:00:40.200
embracing debate, dissent, and self examination,
link |
00:00:43.900
free to speak, to disagree, to think,
link |
00:00:46.880
to explore truly novel ideas.
link |
00:00:49.740
The advisory board includes Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt,
link |
00:00:53.120
and many other amazing people with one exception, me.
link |
00:00:58.120
I was graciously invited to be on the advisory board,
link |
00:01:01.240
which I accepted in the hope of doing my small part
link |
00:01:04.320
in helping build the future of education and open discourse,
link |
00:01:08.060
especially in the fields of artificial intelligence,
link |
00:01:10.480
robotics, and computing.
link |
00:01:12.200
We spend the first hour of this conversation
link |
00:01:14.460
talking about this new university
link |
00:01:16.560
before switching to talking about
link |
00:01:18.880
some of the darkest moments in human history
link |
00:01:21.080
and what they reveal about human nature.
link |
00:01:24.520
This is the Lex Friedman podcast.
link |
00:01:26.500
To support it, please check out our sponsors
link |
00:01:28.660
in the description.
link |
00:01:29.920
And now, here's my conversation with Neil Ferguson.
link |
00:01:35.040
You are one of the great historians of our time,
link |
00:01:37.280
respected, sometimes controversial.
link |
00:01:40.100
You have flourished in some of the best universities
link |
00:01:42.160
in the world, from NYU to London School of Economics,
link |
00:01:45.180
to Harvard, and now to Hoover Institution at Stanford.
link |
00:01:49.480
Before we talk about the history of money, war, and power,
link |
00:01:53.220
let us talk about a new university.
link |
00:01:55.740
You're a part of launching here in Austin, Texas.
link |
00:01:59.720
It is called University of Austin, UATX.
link |
00:02:04.880
What is its mission, its goals, its plan?
link |
00:02:09.320
I think it's pretty obvious to a lot of people
link |
00:02:13.960
in higher education that there's a problem.
link |
00:02:17.600
And that problem manifests itself
link |
00:02:19.480
in a great many different ways.
link |
00:02:22.060
But I would sum up the problem
link |
00:02:24.240
as being a drastic chilling of the atmosphere
link |
00:02:30.560
that constrains free speech, free exchange,
link |
00:02:34.480
even free thought.
link |
00:02:36.680
And I had never anticipated
link |
00:02:38.440
that this would happen in my lifetime.
link |
00:02:40.360
My academic career began in Oxford in the 1980s
link |
00:02:43.080
when anything went.
link |
00:02:45.520
One sensed that a university was a place
link |
00:02:48.000
where one could risk saying the unsayable
link |
00:02:51.280
and debate the undebatable.
link |
00:02:54.320
So the fact that in a relatively short space of time,
link |
00:02:58.640
a variety of ideas, critical race theory or wokeism,
link |
00:03:02.160
whatever you want to call it,
link |
00:03:02.980
a variety of ideas have come along
link |
00:03:04.880
that seek to limit and quite drastically limit
link |
00:03:08.040
what we can talk about strikes me as deeply unhealthy.
link |
00:03:12.600
And I'm not sure, and I've thought about this
link |
00:03:14.500
for a long time, you can fix it
link |
00:03:15.880
with the existing institutions.
link |
00:03:18.680
I think you need to create a new one.
link |
00:03:20.080
And so after much deliberation,
link |
00:03:22.480
we decided to do it.
link |
00:03:24.000
And I think it's a hugely timely opportunity
link |
00:03:29.960
to do what people used to do in this country,
link |
00:03:33.080
which was to create new institutions.
link |
00:03:34.640
I mean, that used to be the default setting of America.
link |
00:03:37.520
We sort of stopped doing that.
link |
00:03:38.600
I mean, I look back and I thought,
link |
00:03:39.560
why are there no new universities?
link |
00:03:41.840
Or at least if there are,
link |
00:03:42.960
why do they have so little impact?
link |
00:03:45.080
It seems like we have the billionaires,
link |
00:03:48.000
we have the need, let's do it.
link |
00:03:50.440
So you still believe in institutions,
link |
00:03:53.080
in the university, in the ideal of the university?
link |
00:03:56.040
I believe passionately in that ideal.
link |
00:03:59.200
There's a reason they've been around for nearly a millennium.
link |
00:04:02.780
There is a unique thing that happens
link |
00:04:08.420
on a university campus when it's done right.
link |
00:04:11.960
And that is the transfer of knowledge between generations.
link |
00:04:16.580
That is a very sacred activity.
link |
00:04:18.320
And it seems to withstand major changes in technology.
link |
00:04:22.840
So this form that we call the university predates
link |
00:04:25.700
the printing press, survive the printing press,
link |
00:04:29.620
continue to function through the scientific revolution,
link |
00:04:32.080
the enlightenment, the industrial revolution to this day.
link |
00:04:37.320
And I think it's because,
link |
00:04:39.320
maybe because of evolutionary psychology,
link |
00:04:41.580
we need to be together in one relatively confined space
link |
00:04:48.720
when we're in our late teens and early twenties
link |
00:04:51.840
for the knowledge transfer between the generations
link |
00:04:54.420
to happen.
link |
00:04:56.320
That's my feeling about this,
link |
00:04:58.200
but in order for it to work well,
link |
00:05:00.720
there needs to be very few constraints.
link |
00:05:03.680
There needs to be a sense
link |
00:05:05.720
that one can take intellectual risk.
link |
00:05:07.880
Remember, people in their late teens and early twenties
link |
00:05:10.760
are adults, but they're inexperienced adults.
link |
00:05:14.220
And if I look back on my own time as an undergraduate,
link |
00:05:17.720
saying stupid things was my MO.
link |
00:05:21.680
My way to finding good ideas
link |
00:05:24.960
was through a minefield of bad ideas.
link |
00:05:28.720
I feel so sorry for people like me today,
link |
00:05:33.260
people age 18, 19, 20 today,
link |
00:05:36.120
who are intellectually very curious
link |
00:05:40.480
ambitious, but inexperienced
link |
00:05:42.960
because the minefields today are absolutely lethal.
link |
00:05:47.880
And one wrong foot and it's cancellation.
link |
00:05:52.080
I said this to Peter Thiel the other day,
link |
00:05:54.380
imagine being us now.
link |
00:05:57.000
I mean, we were obnoxious undergraduates.
link |
00:06:01.200
There's nothing that Peter did at Stanford
link |
00:06:03.520
that Andrew Sullivan and I were not doing at Oxford.
link |
00:06:06.400
And perhaps we were even worse,
link |
00:06:08.040
but it was so not career ending
link |
00:06:11.680
to be an absolutely insufferable,
link |
00:06:17.200
obnoxious undergraduate then.
link |
00:06:21.040
Today, if people like us exist today,
link |
00:06:24.520
they must live in a state of constant anxiety
link |
00:06:28.240
that they're going to be outed for some heretical statement
link |
00:06:32.880
that they made five years ago on social media.
link |
00:06:35.260
So part of what motivates me
link |
00:06:37.360
is the desire to give the me's of today a shot
link |
00:06:42.760
at free thinking and really,
link |
00:06:46.800
I'd call it aggressive learning,
link |
00:06:51.800
learning where you're really pushed.
link |
00:06:54.320
And I just think that stopped happening
link |
00:06:56.360
on the major campuses because whether at Harvard
link |
00:06:59.440
where I used to teach or at Stanford where I'm now based,
link |
00:07:02.680
I sense a kind of suffocating atmosphere of self censorship
link |
00:07:07.080
that means people are afraid
link |
00:07:09.560
to take even minimal risk in class.
link |
00:07:12.480
I mean, just take, for example,
link |
00:07:14.720
a survey that was published earlier this year
link |
00:07:17.720
that revealed this is of undergraduates
link |
00:07:20.360
in four year programs in the US.
link |
00:07:23.760
85% of self described liberal students
link |
00:07:26.600
said they would report a professor
link |
00:07:28.760
to the university administration
link |
00:07:30.800
if he or she said something they considered offensive.
link |
00:07:33.760
And something like 75% said they do it
link |
00:07:36.560
to a fellow undergraduate.
link |
00:07:38.080
That's the kind of culture
link |
00:07:39.700
that's evolved in our universities.
link |
00:07:41.740
So we need a new university in which none of that is true,
link |
00:07:44.760
in which you can speak your mind, say stupid things,
link |
00:07:48.120
get it completely wrong and live to tell the tale.
link |
00:07:52.460
There's a lot more going on, I think,
link |
00:07:54.280
because when you start thinking about
link |
00:07:56.280
what's wrong with a modern university,
link |
00:07:58.340
many, many more things suggest themselves.
link |
00:08:01.800
And I think there's an opportunity here
link |
00:08:03.520
to build something that's radically new in some ways
link |
00:08:06.980
and radically traditional in other ways.
link |
00:08:10.120
For example, I have a strong preference
link |
00:08:11.880
for the tutorial system that you see at Oxford and Cambridge,
link |
00:08:15.400
which is small group teaching
link |
00:08:17.760
and highly Socratic in its structure.
link |
00:08:21.320
I think it'd be great to bring that to the United States
link |
00:08:23.640
where it doesn't really exist.
link |
00:08:25.760
But at the same time,
link |
00:08:26.600
I think we should be doing some very 21st century things,
link |
00:08:30.880
making sure that while people are reading and studying
link |
00:08:33.960
classic works, they're also going to be immersed
link |
00:08:37.400
in the real world of technological innovation,
link |
00:08:41.680
a world that you know very well.
link |
00:08:44.280
And I'd love to get a synthesis of the ancient and classical,
link |
00:08:49.640
which we're gradually letting fade away
link |
00:08:52.280
with the novel and technological.
link |
00:08:55.520
So we wanna produce people who can simultaneously
link |
00:08:58.560
talk intelligently about Adam Smith,
link |
00:09:02.560
or for that matter, Shakespeare or Proust,
link |
00:09:06.440
and have a conversation with you about where AI is going
link |
00:09:11.560
and how long it will be before I can get driven here
link |
00:09:14.920
by a self driving vehicle,
link |
00:09:17.040
allowing me to have my lunch and prepare
link |
00:09:18.800
rather than focus on the other crazy people on the road.
link |
00:09:22.280
So that's the dream that we can create something
link |
00:09:25.320
which is partly classical and partly 21st century.
link |
00:09:29.200
And we look around and we don't see it.
link |
00:09:31.120
If you don't see an institution
link |
00:09:33.000
that you really think should exist,
link |
00:09:35.080
I think you have a more responsibility to create it.
link |
00:09:38.080
So you're thinking including something bigger
link |
00:09:41.960
than just liberal education,
link |
00:09:43.200
also including science, engineering and technology.
link |
00:09:46.080
I should also comment that I mostly stay out of politics
link |
00:09:51.080
and out of some of these aspects of liberal education
link |
00:09:55.680
that's kind of been the most controversial
link |
00:09:57.480
and difficult within the university.
link |
00:09:59.560
But there is a kind of ripple effect of fear
link |
00:10:04.480
within that space into science and engineering
link |
00:10:08.920
and technology that I think has a nature
link |
00:10:14.480
that's difficult to describe.
link |
00:10:16.160
It doesn't have a controversial nature.
link |
00:10:17.680
It just has a nature of fear
link |
00:10:19.360
where you're not, you mentioned saying stupid stuff
link |
00:10:22.560
as a young 20 year old.
link |
00:10:27.200
For example, deep learning, machine learning
link |
00:10:30.080
is really popular in the computer science now
link |
00:10:32.760
as an approach for creating artificial intelligence systems.
link |
00:10:36.000
It is controversial in that space
link |
00:10:40.000
to say that anything against machine learning,
link |
00:10:43.640
saying, sort of exploring ideas that saying
link |
00:10:46.440
this is going to lead to a dead end.
link |
00:10:49.600
Now, that takes some guts to do as a young 20 year old
link |
00:10:54.120
within a classroom to think like that,
link |
00:10:57.320
to raise that question in a machine learning course.
link |
00:10:59.720
It sounds ridiculous because it's like
link |
00:11:01.360
who's going to complain about this?
link |
00:11:03.800
But the fear that starts in a course on history
link |
00:11:10.160
or on some course that covers society,
link |
00:11:13.560
the fear ripples and affects those students
link |
00:11:16.920
that are asking big out of the box questions
link |
00:11:18.840
about engineering, about computer science.
link |
00:11:22.080
And there's a lot, there's like linear algebra
link |
00:11:24.480
that's not going to change,
link |
00:11:26.160
but then there's like applied linear algebra,
link |
00:11:29.120
which is machine learning.
link |
00:11:30.160
And that's when robots and real systems touch human beings.
link |
00:11:34.920
And that's when you have to ask yourself
link |
00:11:36.800
these difficult questions about humanity,
link |
00:11:39.960
even in the engineering and science and technology courses.
link |
00:11:42.960
And these are not separate worlds in two senses.
link |
00:11:46.400
I've just taken delivery of my copy of the book
link |
00:11:50.040
that Eric Schmidt and Henry Kissinger have coauthored
link |
00:11:53.640
on artificial intelligence,
link |
00:11:55.000
the central question of which is,
link |
00:11:56.600
what does this mean for us broadly?
link |
00:11:59.640
But they're not separate worlds in C.P. Snow's sense
link |
00:12:04.080
of the chasm between science and arts,
link |
00:12:07.040
because on a university campus,
link |
00:12:09.800
everything is contagious from a novel coronavirus
link |
00:12:13.640
to the behaviors that are occurring
link |
00:12:16.320
in the English department.
link |
00:12:18.360
Those behaviors, if denunciation becomes a norm,
link |
00:12:23.360
undergraduate denounces professor,
link |
00:12:25.160
teaching assistant denounces undergraduate,
link |
00:12:27.040
those behaviors are contagious
link |
00:12:28.240
and will spread inextricably first to social science
link |
00:12:31.000
and then to natural sciences.
link |
00:12:32.480
And I think that's part of the reason why
link |
00:12:35.960
when this started to happen,
link |
00:12:37.360
when we started to get the origins of disinvitation
link |
00:12:40.840
and cancel culture,
link |
00:12:42.360
it was not just a few conservative professors
link |
00:12:45.480
in the humanities who had to worry,
link |
00:12:47.280
everybody had to worry,
link |
00:12:48.560
because eventually it was going to come
link |
00:12:51.600
even to the most apparently hard stem part of the campus.
link |
00:12:57.680
It's contagious.
link |
00:12:58.880
This is something Nicholas Christakis should look at
link |
00:13:00.880
because he's very good at looking at the way
link |
00:13:03.200
in which social networks like the ones that exist
link |
00:13:06.080
in a university can spread everything.
link |
00:13:08.720
But I think when we look back and ask,
link |
00:13:10.560
why did wokeism spread so rapidly
link |
00:13:13.560
and rapidly out of humanities
link |
00:13:15.600
into other parts of universities?
link |
00:13:17.160
And why did it spread across the country
link |
00:13:19.560
and beyond the United States
link |
00:13:21.600
to the other English speaking universities?
link |
00:13:23.440
It's because it's a contagion.
link |
00:13:25.680
And these behaviors are contagious.
link |
00:13:28.520
The president of a university I won't name said to me
link |
00:13:32.680
that he receives every day at least one denunciation,
link |
00:13:37.520
one call for somebody or other to be fired
link |
00:13:40.880
for something that they said.
link |
00:13:43.080
That's the crazy kind of totalitarianism light
link |
00:13:46.880
that now exists in our universities.
link |
00:13:50.600
And of course the people who want to downplay this say,
link |
00:13:52.760
oh, well, there only have been a hundred and something
link |
00:13:54.760
in disinvitations or,
link |
00:13:56.280
oh, there really aren't that many cases.
link |
00:13:57.920
But the point is that the famous events,
link |
00:14:00.400
the events that get the attention
link |
00:14:02.520
are responsible for a general chilling
link |
00:14:05.040
that as you say, spreads to every part of the university
link |
00:14:07.880
and creates a very familiar culture
link |
00:14:10.840
in which people are afraid to say what they think.
link |
00:14:13.440
Self censorship, look at the heterodox academy data on this
link |
00:14:16.880
grows and grows.
link |
00:14:17.880
So now a majority of students will say,
link |
00:14:20.400
this is clear from the latest heterodox academy surveys,
link |
00:14:23.000
we are scared to say what we think
link |
00:14:24.760
in case we get denounced, in case we get canceled.
link |
00:14:28.560
But that's just not the correct atmosphere
link |
00:14:31.320
for a university in a free society.
link |
00:14:33.960
To me, what's really creepy
link |
00:14:36.600
is how many of the behaviors I see
link |
00:14:39.120
on university campuses today are reminiscent
link |
00:14:41.600
of the way that people used to behave in the Soviet Union
link |
00:14:44.720
or in the Soviet block or in Maoist China.
link |
00:14:47.280
The sort of totalitarianism light
link |
00:14:49.760
that I think we're contending with here,
link |
00:14:52.760
which manifests itself as denunciations,
link |
00:14:56.480
people informing on superiors.
link |
00:14:59.680
Some people using it for career advantage.
link |
00:15:02.800
Other people reduced to helpless desperate apology
link |
00:15:07.080
to try to exonerate themselves.
link |
00:15:09.000
People disappearing metaphorically, if not literally.
link |
00:15:12.440
All of this is so reminiscent of the totalitarian regimes
link |
00:15:16.080
that I studied earlier in my career
link |
00:15:17.760
that it makes me feel sick.
link |
00:15:20.120
And what makes me really feel sick
link |
00:15:21.480
is that the people doing this stuff,
link |
00:15:23.680
the people who write the letters of denunciation
link |
00:15:26.520
are apparently unaware that they're behaving exactly
link |
00:15:29.280
like people in Stalin's Soviet Union.
link |
00:15:31.200
They don't know that.
link |
00:15:32.600
So they clearly have,
link |
00:15:33.720
there's been a massive educational failure.
link |
00:15:36.040
If somebody can write an anonymous
link |
00:15:37.680
or non anonymous letter of denunciation and not feel shame.
link |
00:15:41.200
I mean, you should feel morally completely contaminated
link |
00:15:44.600
as you're doing that, but people haven't been taught
link |
00:15:47.560
the realities of totalitarianism.
link |
00:15:49.760
For all these reasons, I think you need to try
link |
00:15:52.600
at least to create a new institution
link |
00:15:54.840
where those pathologies will be structurally excluded.
link |
00:16:01.840
So maybe a difficult question.
link |
00:16:04.080
Maybe you'll push back on this,
link |
00:16:06.040
but you're widely seen politically as a conservative.
link |
00:16:09.160
Hoover Institution is politically conservative.
link |
00:16:12.440
What is the role of politics at the University of Austin?
link |
00:16:15.920
Because some of the ideas, people listening to this,
link |
00:16:18.760
when they hear the ideas you're expressing,
link |
00:16:21.280
they may think there's a lean to these ideas.
link |
00:16:23.960
There's a conservative lean to these ideas.
link |
00:16:26.200
Is there such a lean?
link |
00:16:28.320
There will certainly be people who say that
link |
00:16:30.160
because the standard mode of trying to discredit
link |
00:16:34.760
any new initiative is to say,
link |
00:16:36.600
oh, this is a sinister conservative plot.
link |
00:16:41.840
But one of our cofounders, Heather Heying,
link |
00:16:45.600
is definitely not a conservative.
link |
00:16:49.160
She's as committed to the idea of academic freedom as I am.
link |
00:16:53.280
But I think on political issues,
link |
00:16:54.680
we probably agree on almost nothing.
link |
00:16:57.320
And at least I would guess.
link |
00:17:00.240
But politics, Max Weber made this point a long time ago,
link |
00:17:04.720
that politics really should stop at the threshold
link |
00:17:07.320
of the classroom, of the lecture hall.
link |
00:17:09.720
And in my career, I've always tried to make sure
link |
00:17:11.920
that when I'm teaching,
link |
00:17:13.680
it's not clear where I stand politically,
link |
00:17:17.960
though of course undergraduates
link |
00:17:19.640
insatiably curiously want to know,
link |
00:17:22.120
but it shouldn't be clear from what I say
link |
00:17:24.600
because indoctrination on a political basis
link |
00:17:28.000
is an abuse of the power of the professor,
link |
00:17:30.840
as Weber rightly said.
link |
00:17:32.920
So I think one of the key principles
link |
00:17:35.920
of the University of Austin will be
link |
00:17:38.280
that Weberian principle that politics
link |
00:17:40.640
is not an appropriate subject
link |
00:17:45.040
for the lecture hall, for the classroom.
link |
00:17:48.320
And we should pursue truth
link |
00:17:51.400
and enshrine liberty of thought.
link |
00:17:56.560
If that's a political issue, then I can't help you.
link |
00:17:58.720
I mean, if you're against freedom of thought,
link |
00:18:01.040
then we don't really have much of a discussion to have.
link |
00:18:04.840
And clearly there are some people
link |
00:18:06.000
who politically seem quite hostile to it.
link |
00:18:08.240
But my sense is that there are plenty
link |
00:18:10.560
of people on the left in academia.
link |
00:18:12.400
I think of that interesting partnership
link |
00:18:14.440
between Cornel West and Robbie George,
link |
00:18:18.200
which has been institutionalized in the Academic Freedom Alliance.
link |
00:18:22.320
It's bipartisan, this issue.
link |
00:18:23.960
It really, really is.
link |
00:18:25.320
After all, 50 years ago, it was the left
link |
00:18:28.080
that was in favor of free speech.
link |
00:18:30.400
The right still has an anti free speech element to it.
link |
00:18:33.880
Look how quickly they're out to ban critical race theory.
link |
00:18:37.080
Critical race theory won't be banned
link |
00:18:38.480
at the University of Texas.
link |
00:18:39.880
Wokism won't be banned.
link |
00:18:41.880
Everything will be up for discussion,
link |
00:18:44.000
but the rules of engagement will be clear.
link |
00:18:46.040
Chicago principles, those will be enforced.
link |
00:18:49.360
And if you have to give a lecture on,
link |
00:18:53.520
well, let's just take a recent example,
link |
00:18:56.400
the Dorian Abbott case.
link |
00:18:57.800
If you're giving a lecture on astrophysics,
link |
00:19:02.040
but it turns out that in some different venue
link |
00:19:04.760
you express skepticism about affirmative action,
link |
00:19:08.160
well, it doesn't matter.
link |
00:19:09.280
It's irrelevant.
link |
00:19:10.160
We want to know what your thoughts are on astrophysics
link |
00:19:13.040
cause that's what you're supposed to be giving a lecture on.
link |
00:19:16.120
That used to be understood.
link |
00:19:17.720
I mean, at the Oxford of the 1980s,
link |
00:19:19.320
there were communists and there were ultra Tories.
link |
00:19:22.920
At Cambridge, there were people who were so reactionary
link |
00:19:25.800
that they celebrated Franco's birthday,
link |
00:19:28.200
but they were also out and out communists
link |
00:19:30.240
down the road at King's College.
link |
00:19:32.720
The understanding was that that kind of intellectual diversity
link |
00:19:36.200
was part and parcel of university life.
link |
00:19:38.880
And frankly, for an undergraduate,
link |
00:19:40.000
it was great fun to cross the road
link |
00:19:42.000
and go from outright conservatism,
link |
00:19:45.320
ultra Torism to communism.
link |
00:19:47.680
One learns a lot that way.
link |
00:19:50.000
But the issue is when you're promoting
link |
00:19:52.320
or hiring or tenuring people,
link |
00:19:54.840
their politics is not relevant.
link |
00:19:57.440
It really isn't.
link |
00:19:59.040
And when it started to become relevant,
link |
00:20:01.520
and I remember this coming up
link |
00:20:03.320
at the Harvard history department late in my time there,
link |
00:20:06.800
I felt deeply, deeply uneasy
link |
00:20:09.080
that we were having conversations
link |
00:20:11.560
that amounted to, well, we can't hire X person
link |
00:20:15.760
despite their obvious academic qualifications
link |
00:20:19.960
because of some political issue.
link |
00:20:24.120
That's not what should happen at a healthy university.
link |
00:20:28.520
Some practical questions.
link |
00:20:31.800
Will University of Austin be a physical in person university
link |
00:20:36.160
or virtual university?
link |
00:20:38.040
What are some in that aspect where the classroom is?
link |
00:20:42.360
It will be a real space institution.
link |
00:20:46.920
There may be an online dimension to it
link |
00:20:50.640
because there clearly are a lot of things
link |
00:20:52.280
that you can do via the internet.
link |
00:20:56.360
But the core activity of teaching and learning
link |
00:21:00.160
I think requires real space.
link |
00:21:02.000
And I've thought about this a long time,
link |
00:21:03.880
debated Sebastian Thrun about this many, many years ago
link |
00:21:07.360
when he was a complete believer in,
link |
00:21:09.520
let's call it the metaversity to go with the metaverse.
link |
00:21:12.000
I mean, the metaversity was going to happen, wasn't it?
link |
00:21:14.040
But I never really believed in the metaversity.
link |
00:21:16.920
I didn't do MOOCs because I just didn't think you'd,
link |
00:21:20.000
A, be able to retain the attention,
link |
00:21:22.240
B, be able to cope with the scaled grading that was involved.
link |
00:21:27.040
I think there's a reason universities have been around
link |
00:21:29.920
in their form for about a millennium.
link |
00:21:32.240
You kind of need to all be in the same place.
link |
00:21:34.520
So I think answer to that question
link |
00:21:36.880
definitely a campus in the Austin area.
link |
00:21:39.960
That's where we'll start.
link |
00:21:41.760
And if we can allow some of our content
link |
00:21:45.120
to be available online, great, we'll certainly do that.
link |
00:21:48.560
Another question is what kind of courses
link |
00:21:50.880
and programming will it offer?
link |
00:21:52.520
Is that something you can speak to?
link |
00:21:54.080
What's your vision here?
link |
00:21:55.720
We think that we need to begin more like a startup
link |
00:22:00.520
than like a full service university from day one.
link |
00:22:05.080
So our vision is that we start with a summer school,
link |
00:22:09.320
which will offer provocatively the forbidden courses.
link |
00:22:12.480
We want, I think, to begin by giving a platform
link |
00:22:18.440
to the professors who've been most subject
link |
00:22:21.880
to council culture and also to give an opportunity
link |
00:22:23.960
to students who want to hear them to come.
link |
00:22:25.760
So we'll start with a summer school
link |
00:22:27.160
that will be somewhat in the tradition
link |
00:22:30.040
of those institutions in the interwar period
link |
00:22:33.320
that were havens for refugees.
link |
00:22:34.840
So we're dealing here with the internal refugees
link |
00:22:37.400
of the work era.
link |
00:22:39.800
We'll start there.
link |
00:22:41.400
It'll be an opportunity to test out some content,
link |
00:22:45.520
see what students will come and spend time in Austin to hear.
link |
00:22:51.240
So that's part A.
link |
00:22:52.520
That's the sort of, if you like, the launch product.
link |
00:22:56.160
And then we go straight to a master's program.
link |
00:23:00.320
I don't think you can go to undergraduate education
link |
00:23:03.400
right away because the established brands
link |
00:23:06.680
in undergraduate education are offering something
link |
00:23:09.280
it's impossible to compete with initially
link |
00:23:11.040
because they have the brand, Harvard, Yale, Stanford,
link |
00:23:14.880
and they offer also this peer network,
link |
00:23:19.040
which is part of the reason people want so badly
link |
00:23:21.720
to go to those places, not really the professors,
link |
00:23:24.120
it's the classmates.
link |
00:23:25.560
So we don't wanna compete there initially.
link |
00:23:28.160
Where there is, I think, room for new entrance
link |
00:23:31.240
is in a master's program.
link |
00:23:35.000
And the first one will be in entrepreneurship
link |
00:23:37.880
and leadership.
link |
00:23:39.520
Because I think there's a huge hunger
link |
00:23:42.400
amongst people who want to get into,
link |
00:23:44.160
particularly the technology world,
link |
00:23:46.040
to learn about those things.
link |
00:23:47.120
And they know they're not really going to learn
link |
00:23:48.880
about them at business schools.
link |
00:23:50.760
The people who are not going to teach them leadership
link |
00:23:53.160
and entrepreneurship are professors.
link |
00:23:55.560
So we want to create something that will be a little like
link |
00:23:59.480
the very successful Schwarzman program in China,
link |
00:24:02.680
which was come and spend a year in China
link |
00:24:05.160
and find out about China.
link |
00:24:07.560
We'll be doing the same, essentially saying,
link |
00:24:09.520
come and spend a year and find out about technology.
link |
00:24:12.320
And there'll be a mix of academic content.
link |
00:24:15.240
We want people to understand some of the first principles
link |
00:24:18.000
of what they're studying.
link |
00:24:19.520
There are first principles of entrepreneurship
link |
00:24:21.680
and leadership, but we also want them to spend time with
link |
00:24:24.200
people like one of our cofounders, Joe Lonsdale,
link |
00:24:26.440
who's been a hugely successful venture capitalist
link |
00:24:30.040
and learn directly from people like him.
link |
00:24:33.240
So that's the kind of initial offering.
link |
00:24:35.800
I think there are other master's programs
link |
00:24:37.720
that we will look to roll out quite quickly.
link |
00:24:39.880
I have a particular passion for a master's
link |
00:24:42.600
in applied history or politics in applied history.
link |
00:24:45.520
I'm a historian driven crazy by the tendency
link |
00:24:48.720
of academic historians to drift away from
link |
00:24:51.640
what seemed to me the important questions
link |
00:24:53.720
and certainly to drift away from addressing
link |
00:24:56.400
policy relevant questions.
link |
00:24:57.840
So I would love to be involved in a master's
link |
00:25:01.080
in applied history.
link |
00:25:02.760
And we'll build some programs like that
link |
00:25:06.000
before we get to the full liberal arts experience
link |
00:25:11.480
that we envisage for an undergraduate program.
link |
00:25:15.000
And that undergraduate program is an exciting one
link |
00:25:17.080
cause I think we can be innovative there too.
link |
00:25:19.680
I would say two years would be spent doing
link |
00:25:22.680
some very classical and difficult classical things,
link |
00:25:26.640
bridging those old divides between arts and sciences.
link |
00:25:30.960
But then there would also be in the second half
link |
00:25:34.920
in the junior and senior years,
link |
00:25:37.520
something somewhat more of an apprenticeship
link |
00:25:41.080
where we'll have centers, including a center
link |
00:25:43.560
for technology engineering mathematics
link |
00:25:47.680
that will be designed to help people make that transition
link |
00:25:51.760
from the theoretical to the practical.
link |
00:25:54.800
So that's the vision.
link |
00:25:57.000
And I think like any early stage idea
link |
00:26:02.000
we'll doubtless tweak it as we go along.
link |
00:26:04.240
We'll find things that work and things that don't work.
link |
00:26:07.360
But I have a very clear sense in my own mind
link |
00:26:10.360
of how this should look five years from now.
link |
00:26:14.000
And I don't know about you.
link |
00:26:14.840
I mean, I'm unusual as an academic
link |
00:26:16.800
cause I quite like starting new institutions
link |
00:26:18.800
and I've done a bit of it in my career.
link |
00:26:22.320
You got to kind of know what it should look like
link |
00:26:25.200
after the first four or five years
link |
00:26:27.160
to get out of bed in the morning
link |
00:26:28.680
and put up with all the kind of hassles of doing it.
link |
00:26:31.920
Not least the inevitable flack that we were bound to take
link |
00:26:35.920
from the educational establishment.
link |
00:26:39.120
And I was graciously invited to be an advisor
link |
00:26:41.960
to this University of Austin.
link |
00:26:45.200
And the reason I would love to help
link |
00:26:49.440
in whatever way I can is several.
link |
00:26:52.720
So one, I would love to see Austin,
link |
00:26:55.360
the physical location flourish intellectually
link |
00:26:58.880
and especially in the space of science and engineering.
link |
00:27:03.320
That's really exciting to me.
link |
00:27:05.320
Another reason is I am still a research scientist at MIT.
link |
00:27:09.760
I still love MIT and I see this effort
link |
00:27:14.760
that you're launching as a beacon
link |
00:27:19.800
that leads the way to the other elite institutions
link |
00:27:23.120
in the world.
link |
00:27:24.440
I think too many of my colleagues
link |
00:27:26.480
and especially in robotics kind of see,
link |
00:27:31.760
don't see robotics as a humanities problem.
link |
00:27:35.880
But to me, robotics and AI will define much of our world
link |
00:27:40.880
in the next century.
link |
00:27:41.800
And for, not to consider all the deep psychological,
link |
00:27:46.800
sociological, human problems associated with that.
link |
00:27:51.800
To have real open conversations, to say stupid things,
link |
00:27:55.800
to challenge the ideas that,
link |
00:27:59.640
of how companies are being run, for example.
link |
00:28:03.120
That is the safe space.
link |
00:28:05.000
It's very difficult to talk about the different
link |
00:28:08.600
questions about technology when you're employed
link |
00:28:11.160
by Facebook or Google and so on.
link |
00:28:13.800
The university is the place to have those conversations.
link |
00:28:17.080
That's right, and we're hugely excited
link |
00:28:18.720
that you want to be one of our advisors.
link |
00:28:21.080
We need a broad and an eclectic group of people.
link |
00:28:26.080
And I'm excited by the way that group has developed.
link |
00:28:31.080
It has some of the, some of my favorite intellectuals
link |
00:28:33.960
are there, Steve Pinker,
link |
00:28:36.600
for example, but we're also making sure
link |
00:28:40.280
that we have people with experience in academic leadership.
link |
00:28:46.960
And so it's a happy coalition of the willing,
link |
00:28:51.960
looking to try to build something new,
link |
00:28:54.600
which as you say, will be complimentary
link |
00:28:56.800
to the existing and established institutions.
link |
00:29:00.280
I think of the academic world as a network.
link |
00:29:04.200
I've moved from some major hubs in the network to others,
link |
00:29:10.000
but I've always felt that we do our best work,
link |
00:29:13.720
not in a silo called Oxford, but in a silo
link |
00:29:17.680
that is really a hub connected to Stanford,
link |
00:29:21.000
connected to Harvard, connected to MIT.
link |
00:29:24.400
One of the reasons I moved to the United States
link |
00:29:26.360
was that I sensed that there was more intellectual action
link |
00:29:30.280
in my original field of expertise, financial history.
link |
00:29:35.760
And that was right.
link |
00:29:37.280
It was a good move.
link |
00:29:39.000
I think I'd have stagnated if I'd stayed at Oxford.
link |
00:29:43.040
But at the same time, I haven't lost connection with Oxford.
link |
00:29:46.400
I recently went and gave a lecture there
link |
00:29:48.800
in honor of Sir Roger Scruton,
link |
00:29:50.480
one of the great conservative philosophers.
link |
00:29:52.840
And the burden of my lecture was the idea
link |
00:29:56.800
of the Anglosphere, which appealed a lot to Roger,
link |
00:30:00.000
will go horribly wrong if illiberal ideas
link |
00:30:04.520
that inhibit academic freedom spread
link |
00:30:06.280
all over the Anglosphere.
link |
00:30:07.800
And this network gets infected with these,
link |
00:30:11.480
I think, deeply damaging notions.
link |
00:30:15.000
So yeah, I think we're creating a new node.
link |
00:30:18.520
I hope it's a node that makes the network overall
link |
00:30:21.760
more resilient.
link |
00:30:23.320
And right now there's an urgent need for it.
link |
00:30:25.840
I mean, there are people whose academic careers
link |
00:30:28.480
have been terminated.
link |
00:30:30.560
I'll name two who are involved.
link |
00:30:32.640
Peter Boghossian, who was harassed out of Portland State
link |
00:30:37.680
for the reason that he was one of those intrepid figures
link |
00:30:43.000
who carried out the grievance studies hoaxes,
link |
00:30:47.040
exposing the utter charlatanry going on
link |
00:30:50.520
in many supposedly academic journals
link |
00:30:53.000
by getting phony gender studies articles published.
link |
00:30:56.920
This is genius.
link |
00:30:57.800
And of course, so put the noses out of joint
link |
00:31:00.880
of the academic establishment
link |
00:31:02.280
that he began to be subject to disciplinary actions.
link |
00:31:05.240
So Peter is going to be involved.
link |
00:31:07.240
And in a recent shocking British case,
link |
00:31:10.240
the philosopher Kathleen Stock has essentially
link |
00:31:12.200
been run off the campus of Sussex University in England
link |
00:31:18.120
for violating the increasingly complex rules
link |
00:31:21.280
about discussing transgender issues and women's rights.
link |
00:31:26.160
She will be one of our advisors.
link |
00:31:28.240
And I think also one of our founding fellows
link |
00:31:30.680
actually teaching for us in our first iteration.
link |
00:31:35.000
So I think we're creating a node that's badly needed.
link |
00:31:38.800
Those people, I mean, I remember saying this
link |
00:31:40.800
to the other founders when we first began
link |
00:31:44.080
to talk about this idea to Barry Weiss
link |
00:31:48.160
and to Panna Canellos as well as to Heather Haying.
link |
00:31:52.640
We need to do this urgently because there are people
link |
00:31:55.960
whose livelihoods are in fact being destroyed
link |
00:31:58.760
by these extraordinarily illiberal campaigns against them.
link |
00:32:02.560
And so there's no time to hang around
link |
00:32:05.040
and come up with the perfect design.
link |
00:32:07.640
This is an urgently needed lifeboat.
link |
00:32:10.120
And let's start with that.
link |
00:32:11.560
And then we can build something spectacular
link |
00:32:13.560
taking advantage of the fact that all of these people have,
link |
00:32:16.640
well, they now have very real skin in the game.
link |
00:32:19.560
They need to make this a success.
link |
00:32:21.720
And I'm sure they will help us make it a success.
link |
00:32:24.520
So you mentioned some interesting names
link |
00:32:27.640
like Heather Haying, Barry Weiss, and so on.
link |
00:32:30.400
Steven Pinker, somebody I really admire.
link |
00:32:32.200
He too was under a lot of, quite a lot of fire.
link |
00:32:35.240
Many reasons I admire him.
link |
00:32:37.840
One, because of his optimism about the future.
link |
00:32:40.560
And two, how little of a damn he seems to give
link |
00:32:44.480
about like walking through the fire.
link |
00:32:48.040
There's nobody more zen about walking through the fire
link |
00:32:50.360
than Steven Pinker.
link |
00:32:51.320
But anyway, you mentioned a lot of interesting names,
link |
00:32:54.200
Jonathan Haidt is also interesting there.
link |
00:32:56.920
Who is involved with this venture at this early days?
link |
00:33:00.880
Well, one of the things that I'm excited about
link |
00:33:04.720
is that we're getting people from inside and outside
link |
00:33:08.200
the academic world.
link |
00:33:09.200
So we've got Arthur Brooks, who for many years
link |
00:33:12.840
ran the American Enterprise Institute very successfully,
link |
00:33:17.600
has a Harvard role now teaching.
link |
00:33:20.720
And so he's somebody who brings, I think,
link |
00:33:23.680
a different perspective.
link |
00:33:27.120
There's obviously a need to get experienced academic leaders
link |
00:33:34.480
involved, which is why I was talking to Larry Summers
link |
00:33:38.600
about whether he would join our board of advisors.
link |
00:33:43.520
The Chicago principals owe a debt
link |
00:33:46.840
to the former president of Chicago.
link |
00:33:50.200
And he's graciously agreed to be in the board of advisors.
link |
00:33:54.120
I could go on.
link |
00:33:54.720
It would become a long and tedious list.
link |
00:33:56.320
But my goal in trying to get this happy band to form
link |
00:34:01.960
has been to signal that it's a bipartisan endeavor.
link |
00:34:06.000
It is not a conservative institution
link |
00:34:08.160
that we're trying to build.
link |
00:34:09.320
It's an institution that's committed to academic freedom
link |
00:34:12.280
and the pursuit of truth that will mean it when it takes
link |
00:34:18.320
Robert Zimmer's Chicago principles
link |
00:34:20.400
and enshrines them in its founding charter.
link |
00:34:22.880
And we'll make those something other than honored
link |
00:34:26.520
in the breach, which they seem to be at some institutions.
link |
00:34:29.680
So the idea here is to grow this organically.
link |
00:34:33.320
We need, rather like the Academic Freedom Alliance
link |
00:34:36.600
that Robbie George created earlier this year,
link |
00:34:39.080
we need breadth.
link |
00:34:40.560
And we need to show that this is not
link |
00:34:42.080
some kind of institutionalization
link |
00:34:45.520
of the intellectual dark web, though we
link |
00:34:47.920
welcome founding members of that nebulous body.
link |
00:34:52.480
It's really something designed for all of academia
link |
00:34:55.440
to provide a kind of reboot that I think we all agree is needed.
link |
00:35:00.320
Is there a George Washington type figure?
link |
00:35:02.840
Is there a president elected yet?
link |
00:35:04.600
Or who's going to lead this institution?
link |
00:35:07.240
Panos Kanellos, the former president of St. John's,
link |
00:35:10.240
is the president of University of Austin.
link |
00:35:12.440
And so he is our George Washington.
link |
00:35:15.400
I don't know who Alexander Hamilton is.
link |
00:35:17.040
I'll leave you to guess.
link |
00:35:18.640
It's funny you mentioned IDW, Intellectual Dark Web.
link |
00:35:21.880
Have you talked to your friend Sam Harris about any of this?
link |
00:35:28.400
He is another person I really admire
link |
00:35:30.760
and I've talked to online and offline quite a bit
link |
00:35:34.520
for not belonging to any tribe.
link |
00:35:39.240
He stands boldly on his convictions
link |
00:35:43.080
when he knows they're not going to be popular.
link |
00:35:46.880
Like he basically gets canceled by every group.
link |
00:35:51.640
He doesn't shy away from controversy.
link |
00:35:54.320
And not for the sake of controversy itself,
link |
00:35:57.040
he is one of the best examples to me
link |
00:36:00.240
of a person who thinks freely.
link |
00:36:02.680
I disagree with him on quite a few things,
link |
00:36:06.000
but I deeply admire that he is what it looks
link |
00:36:10.640
like to think freely by himself.
link |
00:36:12.840
It feels to me like he represents
link |
00:36:14.360
a lot of the ideals of this kind of effort.
link |
00:36:16.560
Yes, he would be a natural fit.
link |
00:36:18.560
Sam, if you're listening, I hope you're in.
link |
00:36:21.440
I think in the course of his recent intellectual quests,
link |
00:36:25.680
he did collide with one of our founders, Heather Haying.
link |
00:36:28.120
So we'll have to model civil disagreements
link |
00:36:31.080
at the University of Austin.
link |
00:36:32.640
It's extremely important that we should all
link |
00:36:35.000
disagree about many things, but do it amicably.
link |
00:36:38.920
One of the things that has been lost sight of,
link |
00:36:41.160
perhaps it's all the fault of Twitter
link |
00:36:42.880
or maybe it's something more profound,
link |
00:36:44.360
is that it is possible to disagree in a civil way
link |
00:36:47.720
and still be friends.
link |
00:36:49.720
I certainly had friends at Oxford
link |
00:36:52.080
who were far to the left of me politically,
link |
00:36:54.520
and they are still among my best friends.
link |
00:36:56.560
So the University of Austin has to be a place
link |
00:36:58.680
where we can disagree vehemently,
link |
00:37:03.400
but we can then go and have a beer afterwards.
link |
00:37:06.600
That's, in my mind, a really important part
link |
00:37:09.800
of university life, learning the difference
link |
00:37:12.840
between the political and the personal.
link |
00:37:15.680
So Sam is, I think, a good example, as are you,
link |
00:37:19.080
of a certain kind of intellectual hero
link |
00:37:24.120
who has been willing to go into the cyber sphere,
link |
00:37:31.120
the metaverse, and carve out an intellectual space,
link |
00:37:37.480
the podcast, and debate everything fearlessly.
link |
00:37:42.960
His essay, it was really an essay on Black Lives Matter
link |
00:37:48.280
and the question of police racism,
link |
00:37:50.840
was a masterpiece of 2020.
link |
00:37:54.360
And so he, I think, is a model of what we believe in.
link |
00:38:01.320
But we can't save the world with podcasts,
link |
00:38:03.880
good though yours is,
link |
00:38:06.840
because there's a kind of solo element
link |
00:38:11.840
to this form of public intellectual activity.
link |
00:38:15.080
It's also there in Substack,
link |
00:38:16.760
where all our best writers now seem to be,
link |
00:38:19.880
including our founder, Barry Weiss.
link |
00:38:22.600
The danger with this approach is, ultimately,
link |
00:38:26.880
your subscribers are the people who already agree with you,
link |
00:38:30.400
and we are all, therefore,
link |
00:38:32.040
in danger of preaching to the choir.
link |
00:38:35.760
I think what makes an institution like University of Austin
link |
00:38:38.160
so attractive is that we get everybody together,
link |
00:38:41.920
at least part of the year,
link |
00:38:44.440
and we do that informal interaction at lunch, at dinner,
link |
00:38:51.800
that allows, in my experience, the best ideas to form.
link |
00:38:57.320
Intellectual activity isn't really a solo voyage.
link |
00:39:00.480
Historians often make it seem that way,
link |
00:39:02.480
but I've realized over time that I do my best work
link |
00:39:06.000
in a collaborative way,
link |
00:39:08.160
and scientists have been better at this
link |
00:39:10.640
than people in the humanities.
link |
00:39:12.440
But what really matters,
link |
00:39:13.760
what's magical about a good university,
link |
00:39:16.120
is that interdisciplinary, serendipitous conversation
link |
00:39:19.520
that happens on campus.
link |
00:39:21.440
Tom Sargent, the great Nobel Prize winning economist and I,
link |
00:39:24.760
used to have these kind of random conversations
link |
00:39:27.800
in elevators at NYU or in corridors at Stanford,
link |
00:39:31.520
and sometimes they'd be quite short conversations,
link |
00:39:34.680
but in that short, serendipitous exchange,
link |
00:39:38.040
I would have more intellectual stimulus
link |
00:39:40.520
than in many a seminar lasting an hour and a half.
link |
00:39:44.400
So I think we want to get the Sam Harris's
link |
00:39:47.280
and Lex Friedman's out of their darkened rooms
link |
00:39:51.440
and give them a chance to interact
link |
00:39:54.000
in a much less structured way than we've got used to.
link |
00:39:59.360
Again, it's that sense that sometimes
link |
00:40:02.720
you need some freewheeling, unstructured debate
link |
00:40:05.600
to get the really good ideas.
link |
00:40:07.280
I mean, to talk anecdotally for a moment,
link |
00:40:08.920
I look back on my Oxford undergraduate experience
link |
00:40:12.000
and I wrote a lot of essays and attended a lot of classes,
link |
00:40:14.680
but intellectually, the most important thing I did
link |
00:40:18.200
was to write an essay on the Viennese satirist Karl Kraus
link |
00:40:22.400
for an undergraduate discussion group called the Canon Club.
link |
00:40:27.440
And I probably put more work into that paper
link |
00:40:29.960
than I put into anything else,
link |
00:40:31.440
except maybe my final examinations,
link |
00:40:33.800
even although there was only really one senior member
link |
00:40:36.600
present, the historian Jeremy Cato,
link |
00:40:38.800
I was really just trying to impress my contemporaries.
link |
00:40:41.880
And that's the kind of thing we want.
link |
00:40:45.720
The great intellectual leaps forward, occurred,
link |
00:40:51.080
often in somewhat unstructured settings.
link |
00:40:54.160
I'm from Scotland, you can tell from my accent,
link |
00:40:57.160
a little at least.
link |
00:40:59.560
The enlightenment happened in late 18th century Scotland
link |
00:41:03.000
in a very interesting interplay between the universities,
link |
00:41:07.280
which were very important, Glasgow, Edinburgh,
link |
00:41:10.120
St Andrews, and the coffee houses and pubs
link |
00:41:14.560
of the Scottish cities where a lot of unstructured discussion
link |
00:41:19.760
often fueled by copious amounts of wine took place.
link |
00:41:24.080
That's what I've missed over the last few years.
link |
00:41:27.280
Let's just think about how hard academic social life has become.
link |
00:41:32.480
That we've reached the point that Amy Chewer
link |
00:41:37.760
becomes the object of a full blown investigation
link |
00:41:41.600
and media storm for inviting to Yale Law School students
link |
00:41:47.200
over to her house to talk.
link |
00:41:50.840
I mean, when I was at Oxford, it was regarded
link |
00:41:52.480
as a tremendous honor to be asked
link |
00:41:54.800
to go to one of our tutors homes.
link |
00:41:58.040
The social life of Oxford and Cambridge
link |
00:41:59.680
is one of their great strengths.
link |
00:42:01.120
There's a sort of requirement to sip
link |
00:42:03.960
unpleasant sherry with the dons.
link |
00:42:06.520
And we've kind of killed all that.
link |
00:42:08.360
We've killed all that in the US because nobody
link |
00:42:10.040
dares have a social interaction with an undergraduate
link |
00:42:13.040
or exchange an informal email in case
link |
00:42:15.720
the whole thing ends up on the front page of the local
link |
00:42:18.200
or student newspaper.
link |
00:42:19.520
So that's what we need to kind of restore,
link |
00:42:22.960
the social life of academia.
link |
00:42:25.560
So there's magic.
link |
00:42:26.400
We didn't really address this sort of explicitly.
link |
00:42:29.320
But there's magic to the interaction between students.
link |
00:42:33.520
There's magic in the interaction between faculty,
link |
00:42:37.400
the people that teach.
link |
00:42:38.360
And there's the magic in the interaction
link |
00:42:39.880
between the students and the faculty.
link |
00:42:41.600
And it's an iterative process that changes everybody involved.
link |
00:42:46.040
So it's like world experts in a particular discipline
link |
00:42:48.960
are changed as much as the students,
link |
00:42:52.880
as the 20 year olds with the wild ideas,
link |
00:42:56.960
each are changed and that's the magic of it.
link |
00:42:59.160
That applies in liberal education,
link |
00:43:01.160
that applies in the sciences too.
link |
00:43:03.520
That's probably maybe you can speak to this,
link |
00:43:05.560
why so much scientific innovation
link |
00:43:08.760
has happened in universities.
link |
00:43:10.640
There's something about the youthful energy
link |
00:43:13.600
of like young minds, graduate students,
link |
00:43:16.480
undergraduate students that inspire
link |
00:43:18.480
some of the world experts
link |
00:43:19.520
to do some of the best work of their lives.
link |
00:43:21.960
Well, the human brain we know is at its most dynamic
link |
00:43:25.080
when people are pretty young.
link |
00:43:27.240
You know this with your background in math,
link |
00:43:29.600
people don't get better at math after the age of 30.
link |
00:43:32.960
And this is important when you think about
link |
00:43:36.800
the intergenerational character of university.
link |
00:43:39.760
The older people, the professors have the experience,
link |
00:43:44.160
but they're fading intellectually
link |
00:43:46.760
from much earlier than anybody really wants to admit.
link |
00:43:50.200
And so you get this intellectual shot in the arm
link |
00:43:55.720
from hanging out with people who are circa 20,
link |
00:43:59.320
don't know shit, but brains are kind of like cooking.
link |
00:44:04.240
I look back on the career I've had in teaching,
link |
00:44:07.320
which is over 25 years at where Cambridge, Oxford,
link |
00:44:10.560
NYU, Harvard, and I have extremely strong relationships
link |
00:44:15.440
with students from those institutions
link |
00:44:19.440
because they would show up,
link |
00:44:23.160
whether it was at office hours or in tutorials
link |
00:44:26.120
and disagree with me.
link |
00:44:28.120
And for me, it's always been about encouraging
link |
00:44:31.800
some act of intellectual rebellion,
link |
00:44:35.040
telling people, I don't want your essay to echo my views.
link |
00:44:38.720
If you can find something wrong with what I wrote, great.
link |
00:44:41.760
Or if you can find something I missed that's new, fantastic.
link |
00:44:45.360
So there is definitely, as you said,
link |
00:44:47.040
a magic in that interaction across the generations.
link |
00:44:49.840
And it's extraordinarily difficult, I think,
link |
00:44:53.280
for an intellectual to make the same progress
link |
00:44:57.240
in a project in isolation
link |
00:45:00.120
compared with the progress that can be made
link |
00:45:03.280
in these very special communities.
link |
00:45:05.840
What does a university do?
link |
00:45:07.560
Amongst other things,
link |
00:45:09.320
it creates a somewhat artificial environment
link |
00:45:13.120
of abnormal job security,
link |
00:45:15.280
and that's the whole idea of giving people tenure,
link |
00:45:18.560
and then a relatively high turnover, new faces each year,
link |
00:45:22.640
and an institutionalization of thought experiments
link |
00:45:27.080
and actual experiments.
link |
00:45:29.040
And then you get everybody living
link |
00:45:30.360
in the same kind of vicinity
link |
00:45:31.600
so that it can spill over into 3 a.m. conversation.
link |
00:45:34.720
Well, that always seems to me
link |
00:45:36.520
to be a pretty potent combination.
link |
00:45:39.200
Let's ask ourselves a counterfactual question next.
link |
00:45:41.720
Let's imagine that the world wars happen,
link |
00:45:47.560
but there are no universities.
link |
00:45:51.320
I mean, how does the Manhattan Project happen
link |
00:45:53.880
with no academia, to take just one of many examples?
link |
00:45:58.200
In truth, how does Britain even stay in the war
link |
00:46:01.200
without Bletchley Park,
link |
00:46:02.400
without being able to crack the German cipher?
link |
00:46:07.400
The academics are unsung, or partly sung heroes
link |
00:46:11.800
of these conflicts.
link |
00:46:14.320
The same is true in the Soviet Union.
link |
00:46:15.960
The Soviet Union was a terribly evil and repressive system,
link |
00:46:19.600
but it was good at science,
link |
00:46:21.320
and that kept it in the game,
link |
00:46:23.920
not only in World War II, it kept it in the Cold War.
link |
00:46:27.840
So it's clear that universities are incredibly powerful,
link |
00:46:32.840
intellectual force multipliers,
link |
00:46:35.560
and our history without them would look very different.
link |
00:46:40.200
Sure, some innovations would have happened without them.
link |
00:46:42.440
That's clear.
link |
00:46:43.280
The Industrial Revolution didn't need universities.
link |
00:46:45.240
In fact, they played a very marginal role
link |
00:46:47.520
in the key technological breakthroughs
link |
00:46:49.120
of the Industrial Revolution in its first phase.
link |
00:46:52.200
But by the second Industrial Revolution
link |
00:46:54.240
in the late 19th century,
link |
00:46:55.880
German industry would not have leapt ahead
link |
00:46:58.040
of British industry if the universities
link |
00:46:59.840
had not been superior.
link |
00:47:01.680
And it was the fact that the Germans institutionalised
link |
00:47:04.320
scientific research in the way that they did
link |
00:47:07.320
that really produced a powerful, powerful advantage.
link |
00:47:11.640
The problem was that,
link |
00:47:13.480
and this is a really interesting point
link |
00:47:15.240
that Friedrich Meinlka makes in Die Deutsche Katastrophe
link |
00:47:18.160
for the German Catastrophe,
link |
00:47:19.960
the German intellectuals became technocrats, homo faber,
link |
00:47:24.160
he says.
link |
00:47:25.000
They knew a great deal about their speciality,
link |
00:47:28.160
but they were alienated from, broadly speaking, humanism.
link |
00:47:31.920
And that is his explanation,
link |
00:47:33.120
or one of his explanations for why
link |
00:47:35.200
this very scientifically advanced Germany
link |
00:47:37.800
goes down the path of hell led by Hitler.
link |
00:47:41.600
So when I come back and ask myself,
link |
00:47:43.400
what is it that we want to do with a new university,
link |
00:47:47.320
we wanna make sure that we don't fall into that German pit
link |
00:47:52.320
where very high levels of technical and scientific expertise
link |
00:47:56.360
are decoupled from the fundamental foundations
link |
00:48:00.440
of a free society.
link |
00:48:04.280
So liberal arts are there, I think,
link |
00:48:05.800
to stop the scientists making Faustian pacts.
link |
00:48:09.720
And that's why it's really important
link |
00:48:11.400
that people working on AI reach Shakespeare.
link |
00:48:15.480
I think you said that academics are unsung heroes
link |
00:48:19.600
of the 20th century.
link |
00:48:21.680
I think there's kind of an intellectual,
link |
00:48:25.160
a lazy intellectual desire to kind of destroy
link |
00:48:30.160
the academics, that the academics are the source
link |
00:48:32.640
of all problems in the world.
link |
00:48:34.760
And I personally believe that exactly as you said,
link |
00:48:37.440
we need to recognize that the university
link |
00:48:40.320
is probably where the ideas that will protect us
link |
00:48:45.000
from the catastrophes that are looming ahead of us,
link |
00:48:50.480
that's where those ideas are going to come from.
link |
00:48:52.720
People who work on economics can argue back and forth
link |
00:48:56.840
about John Maynard Keynes.
link |
00:48:58.200
But I think it's pretty clear
link |
00:49:00.720
that he was the most important economist
link |
00:49:03.200
and certainly the most influential economist
link |
00:49:05.520
of the 20th century.
link |
00:49:06.600
And I think his ideas are looking better today
link |
00:49:11.320
in the wake of the financial crisis
link |
00:49:12.960
than they have at any time since the 1970s.
link |
00:49:15.840
But imagine John Maynard Keynes without Cambridge,
link |
00:49:19.920
you can't because someone like that doesn't actually exist
link |
00:49:24.920
without the incredible hothouse
link |
00:49:27.520
that a place like Cambridge was in Keynes's life.
link |
00:49:30.200
He was a product of a kind of hereditary
link |
00:49:32.720
intellectual elite, it had its vices.
link |
00:49:36.160
But you can't help but admire the sheer power of the mind.
link |
00:49:40.160
I've spent a lot of my career reading Keynes
link |
00:49:42.400
and I revere that intellect, it's so, so powerful.
link |
00:49:47.400
But you can't have people like that
link |
00:49:49.760
if you're not prepared to have King's College Cambridge.
link |
00:49:53.600
And it comes with redundancy.
link |
00:49:55.280
I think that's the point.
link |
00:49:56.120
There are lots and lots of things
link |
00:49:57.720
that are very annoying about academic life
link |
00:50:00.520
that you just have to deal with.
link |
00:50:03.320
They're made fun of in that recent Netflix series,
link |
00:50:06.200
The Chair.
link |
00:50:07.360
And it is easy to make fun of academic life.
link |
00:50:10.720
Tom Sharp's Porterhouse Blue did it.
link |
00:50:13.040
It's an inherently comical subject.
link |
00:50:17.040
Professors at least used to be amusingly eccentric.
link |
00:50:20.520
But we've sort of killed off that side of academia
link |
00:50:24.200
by turning it into an increasingly doctrinaire place
link |
00:50:30.440
where eccentricity is not tolerated.
link |
00:50:33.040
I'll give you an illustration of this.
link |
00:50:34.280
I had a call this morning from a British academic
link |
00:50:38.640
who said, can you give me some advice
link |
00:50:40.720
because they're trying to decolonize the curriculum.
link |
00:50:45.840
This is coming from the,
link |
00:50:47.680
diversity, equity and inclusion officers.
link |
00:50:50.800
And it seems to me that what they're requiring of us
link |
00:50:54.120
is a fundamental violation of academic freedom
link |
00:50:56.680
because it is determining ex ante
link |
00:50:59.840
what we should study and teach.
link |
00:51:02.640
That's what's going on.
link |
00:51:04.160
And that's the thing that we really, really have to resist
link |
00:51:08.680
because that kills the university.
link |
00:51:10.280
That's the moment that it stops being
link |
00:51:13.520
the magical place of,
link |
00:51:15.440
being the magical place of intellectual creativity
link |
00:51:20.240
and simply becomes an adjunct
link |
00:51:22.040
of the ministry of propaganda.
link |
00:51:24.000
I've loved the time we've spent talking about this
link |
00:51:27.240
because it's such a hopeful message
link |
00:51:28.920
for the future of the university
link |
00:51:30.240
that I still share with you
link |
00:51:35.160
the love of the ideal of the university.
link |
00:51:37.840
So very practical question.
link |
00:51:39.400
You mentioned summer.
link |
00:51:43.040
Which summer are we talking about?
link |
00:51:44.600
So when, I know we don't wanna put hard dates here
link |
00:51:48.400
but what year are we thinking about?
link |
00:51:51.160
When is this thing launching?
link |
00:51:52.600
What are your thoughts on this?
link |
00:51:53.800
We are moving as fast as our resources allow.
link |
00:51:57.600
The goal is to offer the first of the forbidden courses
link |
00:52:01.800
next summer, summer of 2022.
link |
00:52:03.840
And we hope to be able to launch an initial,
link |
00:52:08.560
albeit relatively small scale master's program
link |
00:52:12.280
in the fall of next year.
link |
00:52:14.480
That's as fast as humanly possible.
link |
00:52:18.360
So yeah, we're really keen to get going.
link |
00:52:21.000
And I think the approach we're taking
link |
00:52:22.920
is somewhat imported from Silicon Valley.
link |
00:52:27.080
Think of this as a startup.
link |
00:52:29.080
Don't think of this as something that has to exist
link |
00:52:31.120
as a full service university on day one.
link |
00:52:33.840
We don't have the resources for that.
link |
00:52:35.200
You did billions and billions of dollars
link |
00:52:36.760
to build a university sort of as a facsimile
link |
00:52:40.040
of an existing university,
link |
00:52:41.120
but that's not what we want to do.
link |
00:52:42.280
I mean, copying and pasting Harvard or Yale or Stanford
link |
00:52:45.640
would be a futile thing to do.
link |
00:52:46.840
They would probably, you very quickly end up
link |
00:52:49.200
with the same pathologies.
link |
00:52:50.440
So we do have to come up with a different design.
link |
00:52:52.240
And one way of doing that is to grow it organically
link |
00:52:54.680
from something quite small.
link |
00:52:56.880
Elon Musk mentioned in his usual humorous way on Twitter
link |
00:53:02.120
that he wants to launch
link |
00:53:03.600
the Texas Institute of Technology and Science, TITS.
link |
00:53:09.400
Some people thought this was sexist
link |
00:53:11.400
because of the acronym, TITS.
link |
00:53:13.920
So first of all, I understand their viewpoint,
link |
00:53:16.560
but I also think there needs to be a place
link |
00:53:18.640
for humor on the internet, even from CEOs.
link |
00:53:21.560
So on this podcast, I've gotten a chance
link |
00:53:23.800
to talk to quite a few CEOs.
link |
00:53:26.440
And what I love to see is authenticity.
link |
00:53:29.560
And humor is often a sign of authenticity.
link |
00:53:33.080
The quirkiness that you mentioned
link |
00:53:36.880
is such a beautiful characteristic
link |
00:53:39.520
of professors and faculty in great universities
link |
00:53:42.520
is also beautiful to see as CEOs, especially founding CEOs.
link |
00:53:46.280
So anyway, the deeper point he was making
link |
00:53:51.480
is showing an excitement for the university
link |
00:53:54.360
as a place for big ideas in science, technology, engineering.
link |
00:53:59.600
So to me, if there's some kind of way,
link |
00:54:02.960
if there is a serious thought that he had behind this tweet,
link |
00:54:07.520
not to analyze Elon Musk's Twitter like it's Shakespeare,
link |
00:54:10.920
but if there's a serious thought,
link |
00:54:13.960
I would love to see him supporting the flourishing of Austin
link |
00:54:18.320
as a place for science, technology,
link |
00:54:20.360
for these kinds of intellectual developments
link |
00:54:22.280
that we're talking about,
link |
00:54:25.880
like make a place for free inquiry, civil disagreements,
link |
00:54:31.640
coupled with great education and conversations
link |
00:54:35.840
about artificial intelligence, about technology,
link |
00:54:37.880
about engineering.
link |
00:54:39.280
So I'm actually gonna,
link |
00:54:41.800
I hope there's a serious idea behind that tweet
link |
00:54:43.840
and I'm gonna chat with him about it.
link |
00:54:46.320
I do too.
link |
00:54:47.160
I do too.
link |
00:54:48.760
Most of the biggest storms in teacups of my academic career
link |
00:54:56.440
have been caused by bad jokes that I've made.
link |
00:54:59.920
These days, if you wanna make bad jokes,
link |
00:55:04.000
being a billionaire is a great idea.
link |
00:55:08.080
I'm not here to defend Elon's Twitter style
link |
00:55:12.400
or sense of humor.
link |
00:55:14.320
He's not gonna be remembered for his tweets, I think.
link |
00:55:18.320
He's gonna be remembered
link |
00:55:19.320
for the astonishing companies that he's built
link |
00:55:22.320
and his contributions in a whole range of fields
link |
00:55:26.720
from SpaceX to Tesla and solar energy.
link |
00:55:31.720
And I very much hope that we can interest Elon
link |
00:55:35.400
in this project.
link |
00:55:36.240
We need not only Elon, but a whole range of his peers
link |
00:55:41.640
because this takes resources.
link |
00:55:45.160
Universities are not cheap things to run,
link |
00:55:47.400
especially if, as I hope,
link |
00:55:49.480
we can make as much of the tuition
link |
00:55:55.880
covered by scholarships and bursaries.
link |
00:55:57.600
We want to attract the best intellectual talent
link |
00:56:02.240
to this institution.
link |
00:56:04.400
The best intellectual talent
link |
00:56:05.800
is somewhat randomly distributed through society.
link |
00:56:08.360
And some of it is in the bottom quintile
link |
00:56:09.960
of the income distribution.
link |
00:56:11.680
And that makes it hard to get to elite education.
link |
00:56:13.800
So this will take resources.
link |
00:56:17.120
The last generation of super wealthy plutocrats,
link |
00:56:22.240
the generation of the Gilded Age of the late 19th century,
link |
00:56:25.880
did a pretty good job of funding universities.
link |
00:56:28.640
Now Chicago wouldn't exist, but for the money of that era.
link |
00:56:33.040
And so my message to not only to Elon,
link |
00:56:35.400
but to all of the peers, all of those people
link |
00:56:38.480
who made their billions out of technology
link |
00:56:41.160
over the last couple of decades is this is your time.
link |
00:56:44.360
I mean, and this is your opportunity
link |
00:56:45.760
to create something new.
link |
00:56:47.120
I can't really understand why the wealthy of our time
link |
00:56:51.120
are content to hand their money.
link |
00:56:53.680
I mean, think of the vast sums Mike Bloomberg
link |
00:56:56.600
recently gave to Johns Hopkins to established institutions.
link |
00:57:01.640
When on close inspection, those institutions
link |
00:57:05.720
don't seem to spend the money terribly well.
link |
00:57:10.200
And in fact, one of the mysteries of our time
link |
00:57:12.880
is the lack of due diligence
link |
00:57:14.440
that hard nosed billionaires seem to do
link |
00:57:16.960
when it comes to philanthropy.
link |
00:57:19.280
So I think there's an opportunity here
link |
00:57:21.720
for this generation of very talented, wealthy people
link |
00:57:25.160
to do what their counterparts did in the late 19th
link |
00:57:29.000
and early 20th century and create some new institutions.
link |
00:57:32.600
And they don't need to put their names on the buildings.
link |
00:57:34.840
They just need to do what the founders of Chicago,
link |
00:57:39.000
University of Chicago did,
link |
00:57:40.440
create something new that will endure.
link |
00:57:45.360
Yeah, MIT is launching a college of computing
link |
00:57:49.160
and Stephen Schwarzman has given quite a large sum of money,
link |
00:57:54.320
I think in total, a billion dollars.
link |
00:57:56.840
And as somebody who loves computing,
link |
00:57:59.360
as somebody who loves MIT, I want some accountability
link |
00:58:03.520
for MIT becoming a better institution.
link |
00:58:07.040
And this is once again,
link |
00:58:08.800
why I'm excited about University of Austin
link |
00:58:10.720
because it serves as a beacon.
link |
00:58:12.240
Look, you can create something new
link |
00:58:14.400
and this is what the great institutions
link |
00:58:16.440
of the future should look like.
link |
00:58:18.320
And Steve Schwarzman is also an innovator.
link |
00:58:22.440
The idea of creating a college on the Tsinghua campus
link |
00:58:26.920
and creating a kind of Rhodes program
link |
00:58:28.720
for students from the Western world
link |
00:58:30.080
to come study in China was Steve's idea.
link |
00:58:33.400
And I was somewhat involved,
link |
00:58:35.480
did some visiting, professing there.
link |
00:58:38.600
It taught me that you can create something new
link |
00:58:42.480
in that area of graduate education
link |
00:58:45.120
and quite quickly attract really strong applicants
link |
00:58:49.800
because the people who finished their four years
link |
00:58:52.400
at Harvard or Stanford know that they don't know a lot.
link |
00:58:57.600
And I, having taught a lot of people in that group,
link |
00:59:02.400
know how intellectually dissatisfied they often are
link |
00:59:06.240
at the end of four years.
link |
00:59:08.040
I mean, they may have beautifully gamed the system
link |
00:59:10.280
to graduate summa magna cum laude,
link |
00:59:12.520
but they kind of know they'll confess it
link |
00:59:15.760
after a drink or two.
link |
00:59:16.800
They know that they gamed the system
link |
00:59:18.320
and that intellectually it wasn't
link |
00:59:20.400
the fulfilling experience they wanted.
link |
00:59:22.320
And they also know that an MBA from a comparable institution
link |
00:59:26.280
would not be a massive intellectual step forward.
link |
00:59:29.360
So I think what we want to say is,
link |
00:59:32.240
here's something really novel, exciting,
link |
00:59:35.240
that will be intellectually very challenging.
link |
00:59:37.880
I do think the University of Austin has to be difficult.
link |
00:59:42.360
I'd like it to feel a little bit like
link |
00:59:44.040
surviving Navy SEAL training to come through this program
link |
00:59:47.000
because it will be intellectually demanding.
link |
00:59:49.400
That I think should be a magnet.
link |
00:59:51.320
So yeah, Steve, if you're listening,
link |
00:59:54.280
please join Elon in supporting this.
link |
00:59:56.840
And Peter Thiel, if you're listening,
link |
00:59:59.760
I know how skeptical you are about the idea
link |
01:00:02.160
of creating a new university because heaven knows,
link |
01:00:04.680
Peter and I have been discussing this idea for years
link |
01:00:06.560
and he's always said, well, no, we thought about this
link |
01:00:08.440
and it just isn't gonna work.
link |
01:00:09.360
But I really think we've got a responsibility to do this.
link |
01:00:15.120
Well, Steve's been on this podcast before.
link |
01:00:17.000
We've spoken a few times, so I'll send this to him.
link |
01:00:19.800
I hope he does actually get behind it as well.
link |
01:00:22.200
So I'm super excited by the ideas
link |
01:00:26.200
that we've been talking about that this effort represents
link |
01:00:29.600
and what ripple effect it has on the rest of society.
link |
01:00:32.800
So thank you.
link |
01:00:33.640
That was a time beautifully spent.
link |
01:00:36.240
And I'm really grateful for the fortune
link |
01:00:41.400
of getting a chance to talk to you
link |
01:00:43.600
at this moment in history
link |
01:00:45.320
because I've been a big fan of your work
link |
01:00:47.800
and the reason I wanted to talk to you today
link |
01:00:50.440
is about all the excellent books you've written
link |
01:00:53.960
about various aspects of history through money, war,
link |
01:00:58.120
power, pandemics, all of that.
link |
01:01:00.560
But I'm glad that we got a chance to talk about this,
link |
01:01:04.360
which is not looking at history, it's looking at the future.
link |
01:01:07.960
This is a beautiful little fortuitous moment.
link |
01:01:12.400
I appreciate you talking about it.
link |
01:01:15.280
In the book, Ascent of Money,
link |
01:01:17.800
you give a history of the world through the lens of money.
link |
01:01:21.560
If the financial system is a evolutionary nature,
link |
01:01:24.680
much like life on earth,
link |
01:01:26.160
what is the origin of money on earth?
link |
01:01:28.720
The origin of money predates coins.
link |
01:01:33.080
Most people kind of assume I'll talk about coins,
link |
01:01:35.720
but coins are relatively late developments.
link |
01:01:40.080
Back in ancient Mesopotamia,
link |
01:01:41.960
so I don't know, 5,000 years ago,
link |
01:01:44.120
there were relations between creditors and debtors.
link |
01:01:49.280
There are even in the simplest economy
link |
01:01:52.240
because of the way in which agriculture works.
link |
01:01:55.840
Hey, I need to plant these seeds,
link |
01:01:58.760
but I'm not gonna have crops for X months.
link |
01:02:01.440
So we have clay tablets
link |
01:02:03.440
in which simple debt transactions are inscribed.
link |
01:02:07.440
I remember looking at great numbers of these
link |
01:02:09.440
in the British Museum
link |
01:02:10.280
when I was writing The Ascent of Money.
link |
01:02:12.800
And that's really the beginning of money.
link |
01:02:15.840
The minute you start recording a relationship
link |
01:02:18.800
between a creditor and a debtor,
link |
01:02:19.920
you have something that is quasi money.
link |
01:02:22.520
And that is probably what these
link |
01:02:23.520
clay tablets mostly denoted.
link |
01:02:28.520
From that point on,
link |
01:02:30.520
there's a great evolutionary experiment
link |
01:02:32.960
to see what the most convenient way is
link |
01:02:36.760
to record relations between creditors and debtors.
link |
01:02:42.960
And what emerges in the time of the ancient Greeks
link |
01:02:47.960
are coins, metal, tokens,
link |
01:02:51.640
sometimes a valuable metal, sometimes not,
link |
01:02:55.640
usually bearing the imprint of a state or a monarch.
link |
01:02:59.320
And that's the sort of more familiar form of money
link |
01:03:03.320
that we still use today for very, very small transactions.
link |
01:03:07.320
I expect coins will all be gone
link |
01:03:09.640
by the time my youngest son is my age,
link |
01:03:12.720
but the money that I have is still there.
link |
01:03:15.720
My youngest son is my age,
link |
01:03:18.080
but they're a last remnant of a very, very old way
link |
01:03:21.040
of doing simple transactions.
link |
01:03:24.320
And when you say coins, you mean physical coins.
link |
01:03:27.840
I'm talking about coins have been rebranded
link |
01:03:30.640
in the digital space as well.
link |
01:03:31.480
Yeah, not coin based coins, actual coin coins.
link |
01:03:34.120
You know, the ones that jangle in your pocket
link |
01:03:36.400
and you kind of don't know quite what to do with
link |
01:03:38.520
once you have some.
link |
01:03:39.800
So that became an incredibly pervasive form
link |
01:03:44.800
of paying for things.
link |
01:03:47.360
Money's just a, it's just a crystallization
link |
01:03:50.000
of a relationship between a debtor and a creditor.
link |
01:03:52.000
And the coins are just very fungible.
link |
01:03:55.120
Whereas a clay tablet relates to a specific transaction,
link |
01:03:58.800
coins are generic and fungible.
link |
01:04:00.320
They can be used in any transaction.
link |
01:04:02.200
So that was an important evolutionary advance.
link |
01:04:05.040
If you think of financial history,
link |
01:04:06.360
and this was the point of the ascent of money,
link |
01:04:08.240
as an evolutionary story, there are punctuated equilibria.
link |
01:04:12.520
People get by with coins for a long time,
link |
01:04:15.440
despite their defects as a means of payment,
link |
01:04:19.080
such as that they can be debased, they can be clipped.
link |
01:04:23.120
It's very hard to avoid fake or debased money
link |
01:04:27.160
entering the system.
link |
01:04:28.760
But coinage is still kind of the basis of payments
link |
01:04:31.800
all the way through the Roman Empire,
link |
01:04:34.200
out the other end into the so called dark ages.
link |
01:04:36.960
It's still how most things are settled
link |
01:04:39.400
in cash transactions in the early 1300s.
link |
01:04:43.880
You don't get a big shift until after the Black Death,
link |
01:04:47.800
when there's such a need to monetize the economy
link |
01:04:50.920
because of chronic labor shortages
link |
01:04:52.440
and feudalism begins to unravel,
link |
01:04:54.720
that you just don't have a sufficient amount of coinage.
link |
01:04:58.880
And so you get bills of exchange.
link |
01:05:00.240
And I'm really into bills of exchange,
link |
01:05:03.600
because, and this I hope will capture your listeners
link |
01:05:07.560
and viewers imaginations,
link |
01:05:10.360
when they start using bills of exchange,
link |
01:05:13.240
which are really just pieces of paper saying,
link |
01:05:17.240
I owe you over a three month period
link |
01:05:19.360
while goods are in transit from Florence to London,
link |
01:05:23.880
you get the first peer to peer payment system,
link |
01:05:27.960
which is network verified,
link |
01:05:29.640
because they're not coins,
link |
01:05:31.320
they don't have a King's head on them.
link |
01:05:33.480
They're just pieces of paper.
link |
01:05:35.320
And the verification comes in the form of signatures.
link |
01:05:38.320
And you need ultimately some kind of guarantee
link |
01:05:42.680
if I write an IOU to you, bills of exchange,
link |
01:05:46.560
I mean, you don't really know me that well,
link |
01:05:48.320
we only just met.
link |
01:05:49.400
So you might wanna get endorsed by, I don't know,
link |
01:05:52.080
somebody really credit worthy like Elon.
link |
01:05:54.960
And so we actually can see in the late 14th century
link |
01:05:58.200
in Northern Italy and England and elsewhere,
link |
01:06:00.960
the evolution of a peer to peer network system
link |
01:06:04.560
of payment.
link |
01:06:06.240
And that's actually how world trade grows,
link |
01:06:09.240
because you just couldn't settle
link |
01:06:11.160
long oceanic transactions with coinage.
link |
01:06:14.040
It just wasn't practical.
link |
01:06:15.720
All those treasure chests full of the balloons,
link |
01:06:18.320
which were part of the way in which the Spanish empire worked
link |
01:06:21.120
really inefficient.
link |
01:06:22.640
So bills of exchange are an exciting part of the story.
link |
01:06:26.240
And they illustrate something I should have made more clear
link |
01:06:29.520
in the ascent of money,
link |
01:06:31.280
that not everything used in payment needs to be money.
link |
01:06:36.080
Classically, economists will tell you, oh, well, money,
link |
01:06:39.000
money has three different functions.
link |
01:06:41.320
It's you've heard this a zillion times, right?
link |
01:06:43.320
It's a unit of account, it's a store of value,
link |
01:06:46.280
and it's a medium of exchange.
link |
01:06:49.200
Now, there are three or four things
link |
01:06:51.560
that are worth saying about this, and I'll just say two.
link |
01:06:53.840
One, it may be that those three things are a trilemma,
link |
01:06:57.120
and it's very difficult for anything to be all of them.
link |
01:06:59.480
This point was made by my Hoover colleague,
link |
01:07:01.920
Manny Rincon Cruz last year,
link |
01:07:03.440
and I still wish he would write this up as a paper
link |
01:07:05.680
because it's a great insight.
link |
01:07:07.680
The second thing that's really interesting to me
link |
01:07:09.760
is that payments don't need to be money.
link |
01:07:12.880
And if we go around, as economists love to do,
link |
01:07:16.120
saying, well, Bitcoin's not money
link |
01:07:17.880
because it doesn't fulfill these criteria,
link |
01:07:20.680
we're missing the point
link |
01:07:21.720
that you could build a system of payments,
link |
01:07:24.560
which I think is how we should think about crypto
link |
01:07:26.840
that isn't money, doesn't need to be money.
link |
01:07:29.120
It's like bills of exchange.
link |
01:07:30.560
It's network based verification,
link |
01:07:33.600
peer to peer transactions without third party verification.
link |
01:07:38.000
When it hit me the other day
link |
01:07:39.240
that we actually have this precedent for crypto,
link |
01:07:41.480
I got quite excited and thought,
link |
01:07:43.560
I wish I had written that in the Ascent of Money.
link |
01:07:46.560
Can you sort of from a first principles,
link |
01:07:48.760
like almost like a physics perspective,
link |
01:07:51.800
or maybe a human perspective,
link |
01:07:54.160
describe where does the value of money come from?
link |
01:07:58.720
Like where is it actually, where is it?
link |
01:08:01.520
So it's a sheet of paper or it's coins,
link |
01:08:04.720
but it feels like in a platonic sense,
link |
01:08:08.080
there's some kind of thing
link |
01:08:09.200
that's actually storing the value.
link |
01:08:11.160
As us, a bunch of ants are dancing around and so on.
link |
01:08:15.240
I come from a family of physicists.
link |
01:08:17.360
I'm the black sheep of the family.
link |
01:08:18.560
My mother's a physicist, my sister is.
link |
01:08:21.120
And so when you asked me to explain something
link |
01:08:23.360
in physics terms, I get a kind of little part of me dies
link |
01:08:27.360
because I know I'll fail.
link |
01:08:30.360
But in truth, it doesn't really matter
link |
01:08:33.000
what we decide money is going to be.
link |
01:08:36.400
And anything can record, crystallize
link |
01:08:41.400
the relationship between the creditor and the debtor.
link |
01:08:46.080
It could be a piece of paper, it can be a piece of metal.
link |
01:08:48.360
It can be nothing, can just be a digital entry.
link |
01:08:51.760
It's trust that we're really talking about here.
link |
01:08:56.440
We are not just trusting one another.
link |
01:08:59.680
We may not, but we are trusting the money.
link |
01:09:03.800
So whatever we use to represent
link |
01:09:08.760
the creditor debtor relationship,
link |
01:09:10.200
whether it's a banknote or a coin or whatever,
link |
01:09:13.160
it does depend on us both trusting it.
link |
01:09:19.240
And that doesn't always pertain.
link |
01:09:21.640
What we see in episodes of inflation,
link |
01:09:25.080
especially episodes of hyperinflation,
link |
01:09:26.880
is a crisis of trust, a crisis of confidence
link |
01:09:29.920
in the means of payments.
link |
01:09:33.000
And this is very traumatic for the societies
link |
01:09:34.920
to which it happens.
link |
01:09:38.080
By and large, human beings,
link |
01:09:40.000
particularly once you have a rule of law system
link |
01:09:43.040
of the sort that evolved in the West
link |
01:09:44.680
and then became generalized,
link |
01:09:46.560
are predisposed to trust one another.
link |
01:09:49.640
And the default setting is to trust money.
link |
01:09:52.560
Even when it depreciates at a quite steady rate
link |
01:09:54.960
as the US dollar has done pretty much uninterruptedly
link |
01:10:00.080
since the 1960s, it takes quite a big disruption
link |
01:10:05.360
for money to lose that trust.
link |
01:10:07.520
But I think essentially what money should be thought of as
link |
01:10:11.720
is a series of tokens that can take any form we like
link |
01:10:15.880
and can be purely digital,
link |
01:10:18.200
which represent our transactions as creditors and debtors.
link |
01:10:23.200
And the whole thing depends on our collective trust to work.
link |
01:10:27.600
I had to explain this to Stephen Colbert once
link |
01:10:29.840
in the Colbert Show, the old show that was actually funny.
link |
01:10:33.520
And it was a great moment when he said,
link |
01:10:38.800
so Neil, could I be money?
link |
01:10:41.880
And I said, yes, we could settle a debt
link |
01:10:47.080
with a human being that was quite common in much of history,
link |
01:10:50.600
but it's not the most convenient form of money.
link |
01:10:55.040
Money has to be convenient.
link |
01:10:56.960
That's why when they worked out
link |
01:10:58.920
how to make payments with cell phones,
link |
01:11:00.840
the Chinese simply went straight there from bank accounts.
link |
01:11:04.680
They skipped out credit cards.
link |
01:11:06.160
You won't see credit cards in China,
link |
01:11:08.120
except in the hands of naive tourists.
link |
01:11:10.760
How much can this trust bear
link |
01:11:14.280
in terms of us humans with our human nature testing it?
link |
01:11:18.080
I guess the surprising thing is the thing works.
link |
01:11:21.960
A bunch of self interested ants running around
link |
01:11:25.520
trading in trust.
link |
01:11:27.360
And it seems to work except for a bunch of moments
link |
01:11:31.200
in human history when there's hyperinflation,
link |
01:11:33.120
like you mentioned.
link |
01:11:34.280
And it's just kind of amazing.
link |
01:11:38.480
It's kind of amazing that us humans,
link |
01:11:40.440
if I were to be optimistic and sort of hopeful
link |
01:11:42.520
about human nature, it gives me a sense
link |
01:11:45.000
that people want to lean on each other.
link |
01:11:49.240
They want to trust.
link |
01:11:51.240
That's certainly, I would say probably now,
link |
01:11:54.840
a widely shared view amongst evolutionary psychologists,
link |
01:11:59.680
network scientists.
link |
01:12:00.960
It's one of Nicholas Christakis's argument
link |
01:12:03.840
in a recent book.
link |
01:12:05.760
I know economic history broadly bears this out,
link |
01:12:08.960
but you have to be cautious.
link |
01:12:12.160
The cases where the system works are familiar to us.
link |
01:12:18.560
Because those are the states and the eras
link |
01:12:23.640
that produce a lot of written records.
link |
01:12:26.480
But when the system of trust collapses
link |
01:12:30.280
and the monetary system collapses with it,
link |
01:12:32.480
there's generally quite a paucity of records.
link |
01:12:35.040
I found that when I was writing Doom.
link |
01:12:38.240
And so we slightly are biased in favor of the periods
link |
01:12:42.120
when trust prevailed and the system functioned.
link |
01:12:47.040
It's very easy to point to a great many episodes
link |
01:12:50.840
of very, very intense monetary chaos,
link |
01:12:53.480
even in the relatively recent past.
link |
01:12:55.960
In the wake of the First World War,
link |
01:12:58.760
multiple currencies, not just the German currency,
link |
01:13:01.280
multiple currencies were completely destroyed.
link |
01:13:03.560
The Russian currency, the Polish currency.
link |
01:13:05.880
There were currency disasters all over
link |
01:13:08.720
Central and Eastern Europe in the early 1920s.
link |
01:13:12.440
And that was partly because over the course
link |
01:13:16.440
of the 19th century, a system had evolved
link |
01:13:18.720
in which trust was based on gold
link |
01:13:22.640
and rules that were supposedly applied by central banks.
link |
01:13:27.920
That system, which produced relative price stability
link |
01:13:32.160
over the 19th century, fell apart
link |
01:13:35.160
as a result of the First World War.
link |
01:13:36.720
And as soon as it was gone, as soon as there was no longer
link |
01:13:40.200
a clear link between those banknotes and coins and gold,
link |
01:13:44.960
the whole thing went completely haywire.
link |
01:13:47.280
And I think we should remember that the extent
link |
01:13:50.040
of the monetary chaos from certainly 1918
link |
01:13:54.240
all the way through to the late 1940s.
link |
01:13:56.480
I mean, the German currency was destroyed
link |
01:13:57.920
not once but twice in that period.
link |
01:14:00.080
And that was one of the most advanced economies
link |
01:14:01.800
in the world.
link |
01:14:02.760
In the United States, there were periods
link |
01:14:06.200
of intensely deep deflation.
link |
01:14:09.520
Prices fell by a third in the Great Depression.
link |
01:14:12.880
And then very serious price volatility
link |
01:14:15.280
in the immediate post World War II period.
link |
01:14:17.280
So it's a bit of an illusion.
link |
01:14:19.960
Maybe it's an illusion for people who've spent most
link |
01:14:24.240
of their lives in the last 20 years.
link |
01:14:26.560
We've had a period of exceptional price stability
link |
01:14:29.480
since this century began in which a regime
link |
01:14:34.480
of central bank independence and inflation targeting
link |
01:14:37.800
appeared to generate steady below 2% inflation
link |
01:14:42.360
in much of the developed world.
link |
01:14:43.600
It was a bit too low for the central bankers liking.
link |
01:14:46.440
And that became a problem in the financial crisis.
link |
01:14:49.120
But we've avoided major price instability
link |
01:14:52.960
for the better part of 20 years.
link |
01:14:54.800
In most of the world, there haven't really been
link |
01:14:56.080
that many very high inflation episodes
link |
01:14:59.200
and hardly any hyperinflationary episodes.
link |
01:15:00.920
Venezuela's one of the very few, Zimbabwe's another.
link |
01:15:03.960
But if you take a 100 year view or a 200 year view,
link |
01:15:06.480
or if you want to take a 500 year view,
link |
01:15:08.600
you realize that quite often the system doesn't work.
link |
01:15:12.720
If you go back to the 17th century,
link |
01:15:14.680
there were multiple competing systems of coinage.
link |
01:15:17.640
There had been a great inflation that had begun
link |
01:15:19.600
the previous century.
link |
01:15:21.560
The price revolution caused mainly by the rise
link |
01:15:24.760
and caused mainly by the arrival of new world silver.
link |
01:15:28.960
I think financial history is a bit messier
link |
01:15:31.760
than one might think.
link |
01:15:33.760
And the more one studies it, the more one realizes
link |
01:15:37.600
the need for the evolution.
link |
01:15:40.200
The reason bills of exchange came along
link |
01:15:41.960
was because the coinage systems had stopped working.
link |
01:15:45.000
The reason that banknotes started to become used
link |
01:15:47.720
more generally first in the American colonies
link |
01:15:50.080
in the 17th century, then more widely in the 18th century
link |
01:15:52.320
was just that they were more convenient than any other way
link |
01:15:56.120
of paying for things.
link |
01:15:57.320
We had to invent the bond market in the 18th century
link |
01:16:00.480
to cope with the problem of public debt,
link |
01:16:02.200
which up until that point had been a recurrent source
link |
01:16:04.600
of instability.
link |
01:16:06.880
And then we invented equity finance
link |
01:16:10.000
because bonds were not enough.
link |
01:16:12.840
So I would prefer to think of the financial history
link |
01:16:16.400
as a series of crises really that are resolved
link |
01:16:18.920
by innovations and in the most recent episode,
link |
01:16:22.640
very exciting episode of financial history,
link |
01:16:25.040
something called Bitcoin initiated a new financial
link |
01:16:29.240
or monetary revolution in response, I think,
link |
01:16:31.880
to the growing crisis of the fiat money system.
link |
01:16:36.080
Can you speak to that?
link |
01:16:37.640
So what do you think about Bitcoin?
link |
01:16:41.680
What do you think it is a response to?
link |
01:16:43.440
What are the growing problems of the fiat system?
link |
01:16:46.400
What is this moment in human history
link |
01:16:49.400
that is full of challenges that Bitcoin
link |
01:16:52.160
and cryptocurrency is trying to overcome?
link |
01:16:55.240
I don't think Bitcoin was devised by Satoshi,
link |
01:17:00.800
whoever he was, for fear of a breakdown
link |
01:17:06.200
of the fiat currencies.
link |
01:17:08.440
If it was, it was a very far sighted enterprise
link |
01:17:11.200
because certainly in 2008,
link |
01:17:12.560
when the first Bitcoin paper appeared,
link |
01:17:14.320
it wasn't very likely that a wave of inflation was coming.
link |
01:17:18.080
If anything, there was more reason
link |
01:17:20.360
to fear deflation at that point.
link |
01:17:22.240
I think it would be more accurate to say
link |
01:17:26.360
that with the advent of the internet,
link |
01:17:28.800
there was a need for a means of payment
link |
01:17:31.160
native to the internet,
link |
01:17:33.280
typing your credit card number into a random website.
link |
01:17:36.280
It's not the way to pay for things on the internet.
link |
01:17:40.240
And I'd rather think of Bitcoin as the first iteration,
link |
01:17:43.560
the first attempt to solve the problem
link |
01:17:45.160
of how do we pay for things
link |
01:17:46.320
in what we must learn to call the metaverse,
link |
01:17:48.800
but let's just call it the internet for old time's sake.
link |
01:17:52.520
And ever since that initial innovation,
link |
01:17:56.040
the realization that you could use computing power
link |
01:17:58.600
and cryptography to create peer to peer payments
link |
01:18:01.720
without third party verification,
link |
01:18:04.160
a revolution has been gathering momentum
link |
01:18:07.160
that poses a very profound threat
link |
01:18:08.920
to the existing legacy system of banks and fiat currencies.
link |
01:18:13.240
Most money in the world today is made by banks,
link |
01:18:15.600
not central banks, banks.
link |
01:18:17.760
That's what most money is, it's entries in bank accounts.
link |
01:18:21.840
And what Bitcoin represents
link |
01:18:24.840
is an alternative mode of payment
link |
01:18:27.040
that really ought to render banks obsolete.
link |
01:18:31.720
I think this financial revolution
link |
01:18:33.560
has got past the point at which it can be killed.
link |
01:18:37.480
It was vulnerable in the early years,
link |
01:18:39.720
but it now has sufficient adoption
link |
01:18:42.400
and has generated sufficient additional layers.
link |
01:18:45.480
I mean, Ethereum was in many ways
link |
01:18:47.400
the more important innovation
link |
01:18:48.880
because you can build a whole system of payments
link |
01:18:52.280
and ultimately smart contracts on top of ether.
link |
01:18:55.000
I think we've now reached the point
link |
01:18:56.280
that it's pretty hard to imagine it all being killed.
link |
01:18:59.800
And it's just survived an amazing thing,
link |
01:19:01.640
which was the Chinese shutting down mining
link |
01:19:03.640
and shutting down everything.
link |
01:19:04.560
And still here we are, in fact, cryptos thriving.
link |
01:19:09.200
What we don't know is how much damage
link |
01:19:13.200
ill judged regulatory interventions are going to do
link |
01:19:16.880
to this financial revolution.
link |
01:19:19.040
Left to its own devices,
link |
01:19:20.680
I think decentralized finance provides
link |
01:19:24.200
the native monetary and financial system for the internet.
link |
01:19:29.120
And the more time we spend in the metaverse,
link |
01:19:32.360
the more use we will make of it.
link |
01:19:34.440
The next things that will happen, I think,
link |
01:19:36.440
will be that tokens in game spaces like Roblox
link |
01:19:40.360
will become fungible.
link |
01:19:42.520
As my nine year old spends a lot more time
link |
01:19:45.000
playing on computer games than I ever did,
link |
01:19:47.720
I can see that entertainment
link |
01:19:49.560
is becoming a game driven phenomenon.
link |
01:19:52.480
And in the game space, you need skins for your avatar.
link |
01:19:56.640
The economics of the internet, it's evolving very fast.
link |
01:20:01.040
And in parallel,
link |
01:20:02.040
you can see this payments revolution happening.
link |
01:20:04.920
I think that all goes naturally very well
link |
01:20:08.720
and generates an enormous amount of wealth in the process.
link |
01:20:13.000
The problem is there are people in Washington
link |
01:20:17.160
with an overwhelming urge to intervene
link |
01:20:20.400
and disrupt this evolutionary process.
link |
01:20:25.240
Partly, I think out of a muddled sense
link |
01:20:28.280
that there must be a lot of nefarious things going on.
link |
01:20:31.680
If we don't step in, many more will go on.
link |
01:20:34.280
This, I think, greatly exaggerates
link |
01:20:35.880
how much criminal activity is in fact going on in the space.
link |
01:20:39.600
But there's also the vested interests at work.
link |
01:20:42.520
It was odd to me, maybe not odd,
link |
01:20:45.960
perhaps it wasn't surprising,
link |
01:20:47.080
that the Bank for International Settlements
link |
01:20:48.840
earlier this year published a report,
link |
01:20:52.040
one chapter of which said this must all go, must all stop.
link |
01:20:55.680
It's all gotta be shut down
link |
01:20:57.520
and it's gotta be replaced by central bank digital currency.
link |
01:21:00.920
And Martin Wolf in the Financial Times read this
link |
01:21:02.800
and said, I agree with this.
link |
01:21:04.400
And one suddenly realized that the banks are clever.
link |
01:21:07.280
They had achieved the intellectual counterattack
link |
01:21:11.880
with almost no fingerprints on the weapon.
link |
01:21:15.640
I think central bank digital currency is a terrible idea.
link |
01:21:18.960
I can't imagine why we would want to copy a Chinese model
link |
01:21:22.600
that essentially takes all transactions
link |
01:21:25.200
and puts them directly under the surveillance
link |
01:21:26.960
of a central government institution.
link |
01:21:28.320
But that suddenly is a serious counterproposal.
link |
01:21:34.480
So on the one side, we have a relatively decentralized,
link |
01:21:39.320
technologically innovative internet native system
link |
01:21:44.040
of payments that has the possibility to evolve,
link |
01:21:46.840
to produce a full set of smart contracts,
link |
01:21:51.160
reducing enormously the transaction costs
link |
01:21:54.120
that we currently encounter in the financial world
link |
01:21:56.080
because it gets rid of all those middlemen
link |
01:21:57.760
who take their cut every time you take out a mortgage
link |
01:22:00.600
or whatever it is.
link |
01:22:01.720
That's one alternative.
link |
01:22:03.560
But on the other side, we have a highly centralized system
link |
01:22:06.440
in which transactions will by default
link |
01:22:08.400
be under the surveillance of the central bank.
link |
01:22:10.760
It seems like an easy choice to me,
link |
01:22:12.360
but hey, I have this thing about personal liberty.
link |
01:22:15.960
So that's where we are.
link |
01:22:17.760
I don't think that the regulators can kill web three.
link |
01:22:22.680
I think we're supposed to call it web three
link |
01:22:24.080
because crypto is now an obsolescent term.
link |
01:22:26.720
They can't kill it,
link |
01:22:28.160
but they can definitely make it difficult
link |
01:22:30.360
and throw a lot of sand into the machine.
link |
01:22:33.520
And I think worst of all,
link |
01:22:35.200
they can spoil the evolutionary story
link |
01:22:37.680
by creating central bank digital currency
link |
01:22:40.680
that I don't think we really need.
link |
01:22:42.960
Or we certainly don't need it in the Chinese form.
link |
01:22:48.520
Do you think Bitcoin has a strong chance
link |
01:22:51.720
to take over the world?
link |
01:22:53.320
So become the primary,
link |
01:22:57.040
you mentioned the three things that make money, money,
link |
01:23:00.480
become the primary methodology
link |
01:23:02.720
by which we store wealth, we exchange.
link |
01:23:05.880
No.
link |
01:23:07.160
No, I think what Bitcoin is,
link |
01:23:09.600
this was a phrase that I got from my friend,
link |
01:23:12.160
Matt McLennan at First Eagle,
link |
01:23:13.880
an option on digital gold.
link |
01:23:15.760
So it's the gold of the system,
link |
01:23:18.520
but currently behaves like an option.
link |
01:23:20.720
That's why it's quite volatile
link |
01:23:22.360
because we don't really know
link |
01:23:23.800
if this brave new world of crypto is gonna work.
link |
01:23:29.280
But if it does work, then Bitcoin is the gold
link |
01:23:31.240
because of the finite supply.
link |
01:23:33.440
What role we need gold to play in the metaverse
link |
01:23:37.280
isn't quite clear.
link |
01:23:38.880
I love that you're using the term metaverse.
link |
01:23:40.720
This is great.
link |
01:23:41.600
Well, I just like the metaversity
link |
01:23:43.760
as the antithesis of what we're trying to do in Austin.
link |
01:23:48.400
But can you imagine I'm using it sarcastically?
link |
01:23:52.320
I come from Glasgow where all novel words
link |
01:23:54.520
have to be used sarcastically.
link |
01:23:55.760
So the metaverse, sarcastic.
link |
01:23:57.560
But see, the beauty about humor and sarcasm
link |
01:24:00.360
is that the joke becomes reality.
link |
01:24:03.520
I mean, it's like using the word Big Bang
link |
01:24:05.800
to describe the origins of the universe.
link |
01:24:07.560
It becomes like that.
link |
01:24:09.440
It will.
link |
01:24:10.280
After a while, it's in the textbooks
link |
01:24:11.800
and nobody's laughing.
link |
01:24:12.880
Yeah, well, that's exactly right.
link |
01:24:14.320
Humor is sticky.
link |
01:24:16.440
Yeah, I'm on the side of humor,
link |
01:24:18.760
but it is a dangerous activity these days.
link |
01:24:21.400
Anyway, I think Bitcoin is the option of digital gold.
link |
01:24:25.360
The role it plays is probably not so much store of value.
link |
01:24:31.080
Right now, it's just nicely not very correlated asset
link |
01:24:33.840
in your portfolio.
link |
01:24:35.240
When I updated the Ascent of Money,
link |
01:24:36.840
which was in 2018, 10 years after it came out,
link |
01:24:40.120
I wrote a new chapter in which I said,
link |
01:24:43.360
Bitcoin, which had just sold off after its 2017 bubble,
link |
01:24:48.200
will rise again through adoption
link |
01:24:51.320
because if every millionaire in the world
link |
01:24:54.200
has 0.2% of his or her wealth in Bitcoin,
link |
01:24:57.840
the price should be $15,000.
link |
01:24:59.960
If it's 1%, it's $75,000.
link |
01:25:03.360
And it might not even stay at 1%
link |
01:25:06.080
because, I mean, look at its recent performance.
link |
01:25:08.200
If your exposure to global stocks had been hedged
link |
01:25:13.040
with a significant crypto holding,
link |
01:25:16.280
you would have aced the last few months.
link |
01:25:19.240
So I think the non correlation property
link |
01:25:23.080
is very, very important in driving adoption.
link |
01:25:26.200
And the volatility also drives adoption
link |
01:25:28.280
if you're a sophisticated investor.
link |
01:25:31.040
So I think the adoption drives Bitcoin up
link |
01:25:35.520
because it's the option of digital gold,
link |
01:25:37.200
but it's also just this nicely not very correlated asset
link |
01:25:40.080
that you wanna hold.
link |
01:25:41.680
In a world where, what the hell?
link |
01:25:43.920
I mean, the central bank's gonna tighten.
link |
01:25:46.400
We've come through this massively disruptive effort
link |
01:25:48.600
of the pandemic, public debt soared,
link |
01:25:51.640
money printing soared.
link |
01:25:54.760
You could hang around with your bonds
link |
01:25:56.760
and wait for the euthanasia of the Rontier.
link |
01:25:59.920
You can hang on to your tech stocks
link |
01:26:01.840
and just hope there isn't a massive correction
link |
01:26:03.760
or dot, dot, dot.
link |
01:26:05.160
Well, and it seems like a fairly obvious strategy
link |
01:26:07.840
to make sure that you have at least some crypto
link |
01:26:10.680
for the coming year, given what we likely have to face.
link |
01:26:15.840
I think what's really interesting is that
link |
01:26:17.720
on top of Ethereum,
link |
01:26:20.080
a more elaborate financial system is being built.
link |
01:26:26.520
Stable coins are the interesting puzzle for me
link |
01:26:32.320
because we need off ramps.
link |
01:26:34.360
Ultimately, you and I have to pay taxes in US dollars.
link |
01:26:39.680
And there's no getting away from that.
link |
01:26:43.400
The IRS is gonna let us hold crypto
link |
01:26:45.560
as long as we pay our taxes.
link |
01:26:48.000
And the only question in my mind is
link |
01:26:50.400
what's the optimal off ramp to make those taxes,
link |
01:26:54.760
make those tax payments?
link |
01:26:57.080
Probably it shouldn't be a currency invented by Facebook.
link |
01:27:01.240
Never struck me as the best solution to this problem.
link |
01:27:05.240
Maybe it's some kind of Fed coin
link |
01:27:09.520
or maybe one of the existing algorithmic stable coins
link |
01:27:12.800
does the job.
link |
01:27:13.640
But we clearly need some stable off ramp.
link |
01:27:16.520
So you don't think it's possible for the IRS
link |
01:27:18.640
within the next decade to be accepting Bitcoin
link |
01:27:21.000
as tax payments?
link |
01:27:22.560
I doubt that.
link |
01:27:24.040
Having dealt with the IRS now
link |
01:27:25.960
since when did I first come here, 2002,
link |
01:27:29.920
it's hard to think of an institution less likely
link |
01:27:32.240
to leap into the 21st century when it comes to payments.
link |
01:27:37.240
No, I think we'll be tolerated, crypto world will be tolerated
link |
01:27:44.240
as long as we pay our taxes.
link |
01:27:46.120
And it's important that we're already at that point.
link |
01:27:48.840
And then the next question becomes,
link |
01:27:50.160
well, does Gary Gensler define everything as a security?
link |
01:27:53.480
And do we then have to go through endless
link |
01:27:56.680
regulatory contortions to satisfy the SEC?
link |
01:28:00.120
There's a whole bunch of uncertainties
link |
01:28:03.240
that the administrative state excels at creating
link |
01:28:06.000
because that's just how the administrative state works.
link |
01:28:09.120
You'll do something new.
link |
01:28:10.480
Hmm, I'll decide whether that's a security
link |
01:28:13.520
but don't expect me to define it for you.
link |
01:28:15.680
I'll decide in an arbitrary way and then you'll owe me money.
link |
01:28:18.960
So all of this is going to be very annoying.
link |
01:28:21.080
And for people who are trying to run exchanges
link |
01:28:25.160
or innovate in the space, these regulations will be annoying.
link |
01:28:29.200
But the problem with FinTech is it's different from tech,
link |
01:28:31.960
broadly defined.
link |
01:28:33.760
When tech got into eCommerce with Amazon,
link |
01:28:36.960
when it got into social networking with Facebook,
link |
01:28:40.320
there wasn't a huge regulatory jungle to navigate.
link |
01:28:43.600
But welcome to the world of finance,
link |
01:28:45.600
which has always been a jungle of regulation
link |
01:28:48.800
because the regulation is there to basically entrench
link |
01:28:53.440
the incumbents.
link |
01:28:54.240
That's what it's for.
link |
01:28:56.040
So it'll be a much tougher fight than the fights
link |
01:28:59.840
we've seen of other aspects of the tech revolution
link |
01:29:04.840
because the incumbents are there and they see the threat.
link |
01:29:09.600
And in the end, Satoshi said it very explicitly.
link |
01:29:13.040
It's peer to peer payment without third party verification.
link |
01:29:15.720
And all the third parties are going, wait, what?
link |
01:29:18.120
We're the third parties.
link |
01:29:20.480
So there is a connection between power and money.
link |
01:29:24.800
You've mentioned World War I from the perspective of money.
link |
01:29:29.080
So power, money, war, authoritarian regimes.
link |
01:29:35.680
From the perspective of money,
link |
01:29:37.280
do you have hope that cryptocurrency can help resist war,
link |
01:29:42.080
can help resist the negative effects
link |
01:29:46.200
of authoritarian regimes?
link |
01:29:48.920
Or is that a silly hope?
link |
01:29:50.360
Wars happen because the people who have the power
link |
01:29:57.360
to command armed forces miscalculate.
link |
01:30:02.840
That's generally what happens.
link |
01:30:06.840
And we will have a big war in the near future
link |
01:30:09.400
if both the Chinese government and the US government
link |
01:30:12.600
miscalculates and they unleash lethal force on one another.
link |
01:30:17.560
And there's nothing that any financial institution
link |
01:30:20.400
can do to stop that any more than the Rothschilds
link |
01:30:24.480
could stop World War I.
link |
01:30:26.480
And they were then the biggest bank in the world by far
link |
01:30:28.880
with massive international financial influence.
link |
01:30:32.720
So let's accept that war is in a different domain.
link |
01:30:38.080
War would impact the financial world massively
link |
01:30:42.200
if it were a war between the United States and China
link |
01:30:44.720
because there's still a huge China trade on.
link |
01:30:49.560
Wall Street is long China, Europe is long China.
link |
01:30:54.120
So the conflict that I can foresee in the future
link |
01:30:56.760
is one that's highly financially disruptive.
link |
01:31:00.120
Where does crypto fit in?
link |
01:31:02.560
Crypto's obvious utility in the short run
link |
01:31:07.040
is as a store of wealth, of transferable wealth
link |
01:31:11.040
for people who live in a world
link |
01:31:12.960
of transferable wealth for people who live
link |
01:31:15.720
in dangerous places with failing,
link |
01:31:18.880
not just failing money, but failing rule of law.
link |
01:31:21.680
That's why in Latin America,
link |
01:31:22.960
there's so much interest in crypto
link |
01:31:24.680
because Latin Americans have a lot of monetary history
link |
01:31:26.800
to look back on and not much of it is good.
link |
01:31:30.160
So I think that the short run problem that crypto solves
link |
01:31:35.240
is, and this goes back to the digital gold point,
link |
01:31:39.280
if you are in a dangerous place with weak rule of law
link |
01:31:43.160
and weak property rights,
link |
01:31:44.840
here is a new and better way to have portable wealth.
link |
01:31:51.400
I think the next question to ask is,
link |
01:31:56.200
would you want to be long crypto
link |
01:31:59.000
in the event of World War III?
link |
01:32:02.200
What's interesting about that question
link |
01:32:03.720
is that World War III would likely have
link |
01:32:05.400
a significant cyber dimension to it.
link |
01:32:07.600
And I don't want to be 100% in crypto
link |
01:32:10.200
if they crash the internet,
link |
01:32:13.280
which between them, China and Russia might be able to do.
link |
01:32:17.720
That's a fascinating question,
link |
01:32:19.280
whether you want to be holding physical gold
link |
01:32:22.040
or digital gold in the event of World War III.
link |
01:32:25.360
The smart person who studied history
link |
01:32:27.160
definitely wants a bit of both.
link |
01:32:29.760
And so let's imagine World War III
link |
01:32:33.400
has a very, very severe cyber component
link |
01:32:35.960
to it with high levels of disruption.
link |
01:32:38.640
Yeah, you'd be glad of the old shiny stuff at that point.
link |
01:32:43.480
So diversification still seems like
link |
01:32:47.040
the most important truth of financial history.
link |
01:32:52.040
And what is crypto?
link |
01:32:53.520
It's just this wonderful new source of diversification,
link |
01:32:56.600
but you'd be nuts to be 100% in Bitcoin.
link |
01:32:59.800
I mean, I have some friends
link |
01:33:02.040
who are probably quite close to that.
link |
01:33:04.040
Close to 100%, yeah.
link |
01:33:05.360
I'd mar the balls of steel.
link |
01:33:11.880
Yeah, in whatever way that balls of steel takes form.
link |
01:33:18.160
You mentioned smart contracts.
link |
01:33:20.120
What are your thoughts about,
link |
01:33:21.760
in the context of the history of money,
link |
01:33:23.640
about Ethereum, about smart contracts,
link |
01:33:25.640
about kind of more systematic at scale
link |
01:33:30.640
formalization of agreements between humans?
link |
01:33:33.460
Well, I think it must be the case
link |
01:33:40.580
that a lot of the complexity in a mortgage is redundant.
link |
01:33:49.100
That when we are confronted with pages and pages
link |
01:33:51.860
and pages and pages of small prints,
link |
01:33:55.340
we're seeing some manifestation
link |
01:33:58.060
of the late stage regulatory state.
link |
01:34:01.180
The transaction itself is quite simple.
link |
01:34:04.700
And most of the verbiage is just ass covering by regulators.
link |
01:34:09.620
So I think the smart contract,
link |
01:34:12.380
although I'm sure lawyers will email me
link |
01:34:16.020
and tell me I'm wrong,
link |
01:34:17.700
can deal with a lot of the plain vanilla
link |
01:34:20.380
and maybe not so plain transactions that we want to do
link |
01:34:24.080
and eliminate yet more intermediaries.
link |
01:34:28.600
That's my kind of working assumption.
link |
01:34:31.940
And given that a lot of financial transactions
link |
01:34:37.900
have the potential at least to be simplified,
link |
01:34:41.740
automated, turned into smart contracts,
link |
01:34:45.380
that's probably where the future goes.
link |
01:34:48.380
I can't see an obvious reason
link |
01:34:49.820
why my range of different financial needs,
link |
01:34:54.100
let's think about insurance, for example,
link |
01:34:56.540
will continue to be met with instruments
link |
01:35:00.940
that in some ways are 100 years old.
link |
01:35:05.580
So I think we're still at an early stage
link |
01:35:08.620
of a financial revolution that will greatly streamline
link |
01:35:12.420
how we take care of all those financial needs that we have,
link |
01:35:17.100
mortgages and insurance leap to mind.
link |
01:35:20.020
Most households are penalized
link |
01:35:23.380
for being financially poorly educated
link |
01:35:27.100
and confronted with oligopolistic
link |
01:35:29.660
financial services providers.
link |
01:35:31.620
So you kind of leave college already in debt.
link |
01:35:35.740
So you start in debt servitude
link |
01:35:40.340
and then you got to somehow lever up
link |
01:35:43.380
to buy a home if you can,
link |
01:35:45.260
because everybody's kind of telling you you should do that.
link |
01:35:47.500
So you and your spouse,
link |
01:35:50.380
you are getting even more leveraged
link |
01:35:53.100
and your long one asset class called real estate,
link |
01:35:57.400
which is super illiquid.
link |
01:35:59.540
I mean, already I'm crying inside at the thought
link |
01:36:03.980
of describing so many households financial predicament
link |
01:36:07.540
in that way, and I'm not done with them yet
link |
01:36:09.060
because, oh, by the way,
link |
01:36:10.660
there's all this insurance you have to take out
link |
01:36:13.180
and here are the providers that are willing to insure you
link |
01:36:15.380
and here are the premiums you're gonna be paying,
link |
01:36:17.740
which are kind of presented to you.
link |
01:36:19.280
That's your car insurance, that's your home insurance.
link |
01:36:22.220
And if you're here, it's the earthquake insurance.
link |
01:36:23.820
And pretty soon you're just bleeding money
link |
01:36:26.460
in a bunch of monthly payments to the mortgage lender,
link |
01:36:30.940
to the insurer, to all the other people that lent you money.
link |
01:36:35.620
And let's look at your balance sheet, it sucks.
link |
01:36:39.340
There's this great big chunk of real estate
link |
01:36:41.220
and what else have you really got on there?
link |
01:36:43.660
And the other side is a bunch of debt,
link |
01:36:45.340
which is probably paying too high interest.
link |
01:36:48.340
The typical household in the median kind of range
link |
01:36:52.440
is at the mercy of oligopolistic
link |
01:36:56.040
financial services providers.
link |
01:36:57.620
Go down further in the social scale
link |
01:37:01.220
and people are outside the financial system altogether.
link |
01:37:03.780
And those poor folks have to rely on bank notes
link |
01:37:07.520
and informal lending with huge punitive rates.
link |
01:37:10.940
We have to do better than this.
link |
01:37:12.100
This has to be improved upon.
link |
01:37:15.300
And I think what's exciting about our time
link |
01:37:17.380
is that technology now exists that didn't exist
link |
01:37:20.220
when I wrote The Ascent of Money to solve these problems.
link |
01:37:22.660
When I wrote The Ascent of Money, which was in 2008,
link |
01:37:26.380
you couldn't really solve the problem I've just described.
link |
01:37:30.380
Certainly you couldn't solve it
link |
01:37:31.620
with something like microfinance.
link |
01:37:32.980
That was obviously not viable.
link |
01:37:35.760
The interest rates were high,
link |
01:37:38.100
the transaction costs were crazy, but now we have solutions
link |
01:37:42.020
and the solutions are extremely exciting.
link |
01:37:43.980
So FinTech is this great force for good
link |
01:37:46.140
that brings people into the financial system
link |
01:37:48.820
and reduces transaction costs.
link |
01:37:50.900
Crypto is part of it, but it's just part of it.
link |
01:37:53.220
There's a much broader story of FinTech going on here
link |
01:37:55.880
where suddenly you get financial services on your phone,
link |
01:38:00.640
don't cost nearly as much as they did
link |
01:38:03.480
when there had to be a bricks and mortar building
link |
01:38:05.100
on main street that you kind of went humbly
link |
01:38:08.220
and beseeched to lend you money.
link |
01:38:10.420
I'm excited about that
link |
01:38:11.620
because it seems to me very socially transformative.
link |
01:38:14.740
I'll give you one other example of what's great.
link |
01:38:17.660
The people who really get sculpted in our financial system
link |
01:38:21.580
are senders and receivers of remittances,
link |
01:38:25.800
which are often amongst the poorest families in the world.
link |
01:38:29.060
The people who are like my wife's family in East Africa
link |
01:38:32.380
really kind of hand to mouth.
link |
01:38:34.500
And if you send money to East Africa
link |
01:38:36.460
or the Philippines or Central America,
link |
01:38:39.060
it's the transaction costs are awful.
link |
01:38:41.840
I'm talking to you, Western Union.
link |
01:38:44.680
We're going to solve that problem.
link |
01:38:47.680
So 10 years from now,
link |
01:38:48.760
the transaction costs will just be negligible
link |
01:38:51.080
and the money will go to the people who need it
link |
01:38:53.160
rather than to rent seeking financial institutions.
link |
01:38:55.760
So I'm on the side of the revolution with this
link |
01:38:57.520
because I think the incumbent financial institutions globally
link |
01:39:01.240
are doing a pretty terrible job
link |
01:39:03.280
and middle class and lower class families lose out.
link |
01:39:08.040
And thankfully, technologically,
link |
01:39:10.040
technology allows us to fix this.
link |
01:39:11.960
Yeah, so FinTech can remove a lot of inefficiencies
link |
01:39:14.120
in the system.
link |
01:39:15.160
I'm super excited myself,
link |
01:39:16.800
maybe as a machine learning person in data oracles.
link |
01:39:20.000
So converting a lot of our physical world into data
link |
01:39:25.280
and have smart contracts on top of that.
link |
01:39:27.160
So that no longer is there's this fuzziness
link |
01:39:30.520
about what is the concrete nature of the agreements.
link |
01:39:34.560
You can tie your agreement to weather.
link |
01:39:37.760
You can tie your agreement to the behavior
link |
01:39:40.760
of certain kinds of financial systems.
link |
01:39:44.080
You can tie your behavior to, I don't know,
link |
01:39:47.480
I mean, all kinds of things.
link |
01:39:48.560
You can connect it to the body
link |
01:39:50.080
in terms of human sensory information.
link |
01:39:53.800
Like you can make an agreement
link |
01:39:56.120
that if you don't lose five pounds in the next month,
link |
01:40:01.120
you're going to pay me $1,000 or something like that.
link |
01:40:03.360
I don't know.
link |
01:40:04.200
It's a stupid example, but it's not going to happen.
link |
01:40:06.760
It's a good example, but it's not
link |
01:40:08.200
because like you can create all kinds of services
link |
01:40:10.840
on top of that.
link |
01:40:11.680
You can just create all kinds of interesting applications
link |
01:40:15.120
that completely revolutionize how humans transact.
link |
01:40:19.800
I think, of course, we don't want to create a world
link |
01:40:26.280
of Chinese style social credit
link |
01:40:29.640
in which our behavior becomes so transparent
link |
01:40:34.480
to providers of financial services,
link |
01:40:36.960
particularly insurers that when I try to go into the pub,
link |
01:40:42.080
I'm stopped from doing so.
link |
01:40:44.920
Every time you take a drink, your insurance goes up.
link |
01:40:47.240
Right, or my credit card wouldn't work
link |
01:40:51.400
in certain restaurants because they serve ribeye steak.
link |
01:40:56.160
I fear that world because I see it being built in China.
link |
01:40:59.160
And we must at all costs make sure
link |
01:41:02.960
that the Western world has something distinctive to offer.
link |
01:41:07.560
It can't just be, oh, it's the same as in China.
link |
01:41:09.920
Only the data go to five tech companies
link |
01:41:13.600
rather than to Xi Jinping.
link |
01:41:16.920
So I think that the way we need to steer this world
link |
01:41:21.720
is in the way that our data are by default
link |
01:41:26.720
are by default vaulted on our devices
link |
01:41:31.120
and we choose when to release the data
link |
01:41:36.400
rather than the default setting
link |
01:41:38.000
being that the data are available.
link |
01:41:40.080
That's important, I think,
link |
01:41:41.120
because it was one of the biggest mistakes
link |
01:41:43.040
of the evolution of the internet
link |
01:41:45.440
that in a way the default was to let our data be plundered.
link |
01:41:50.080
It's hard to undo that,
link |
01:41:51.160
but I think we can at least create a new regime
link |
01:41:56.080
that in future makes privacy default
link |
01:41:59.680
rather than open access default.
link |
01:42:04.120
In the book, Doom, The Politics of Catastrophe,
link |
01:42:07.960
your newest book, you describe wars, pandemics
link |
01:42:11.880
and the terrible disasters in human history,
link |
01:42:15.280
which stands out to you as the worst
link |
01:42:17.920
in terms of how much it shook the world
link |
01:42:21.000
and the human spirit.
link |
01:42:22.280
I am glad I was not around in the mid 14th century
link |
01:42:27.760
when the bubonic plague swept across Eurasia.
link |
01:42:32.520
As far as we can see, that was history's worst pandemic.
link |
01:42:36.960
Maybe there was a comparably bad one
link |
01:42:38.920
in the reign of the emperor Justinian,
link |
01:42:42.280
but there's some reason to think it wasn't as bad.
link |
01:42:45.840
And the more we learn about the 14th century,
link |
01:42:50.040
the more we realize that it really was across Eurasia
link |
01:42:53.360
and the mortality was 30% in some places,
link |
01:42:57.720
50% in some places higher.
link |
01:43:00.480
There were whole towns that were just emptied.
link |
01:43:03.640
And when one reads about the Black Death,
link |
01:43:06.520
it's an unimaginable nightmare of death
link |
01:43:12.040
and madness in the death with flagellant orders
link |
01:43:17.040
wandering from town to town.
link |
01:43:18.800
Town to town seeking to ward off divine retribution
link |
01:43:22.760
by flogging themselves,
link |
01:43:24.840
people turning on the local Jewish communities
link |
01:43:27.000
as if it's somehow their fault.
link |
01:43:28.920
That must have been a nightmarish time.
link |
01:43:32.400
If you ask me for an also random runner up,
link |
01:43:36.600
it would be World War II in Eastern Europe.
link |
01:43:42.160
And in many ways, it might have been worse
link |
01:43:46.280
because for a medieval peasant,
link |
01:43:50.400
the sense of being on the wrong side of divine retribution
link |
01:43:53.760
must have been overpowering.
link |
01:43:56.800
In the mid 20th century,
link |
01:43:59.400
you knew that this was manmade murder
link |
01:44:04.200
on a massive industrial scale.
link |
01:44:06.960
If one reads Grossman's Life and Fate,
link |
01:44:10.560
just to take one example,
link |
01:44:12.880
one enters a hellscape
link |
01:44:15.320
that it's extremely hard to imagine oneself in.
link |
01:44:21.360
So these are two of the great disasters of human history.
link |
01:44:24.800
And if we did have a time machine,
link |
01:44:27.360
if one really were able to transport people back
link |
01:44:30.240
and give them a glimpse of these times,
link |
01:44:34.800
I think the post traumatic stress would be enormous.
link |
01:44:37.400
People would come back from those trips
link |
01:44:39.680
even if it was a one day excursion with guaranteed survival
link |
01:44:44.400
in a state of utter shock.
link |
01:44:48.120
You often explore counterfactual and hypothetical history,
link |
01:44:51.200
which is a fascinating thing to do,
link |
01:44:53.680
sometimes to a controversial degree.
link |
01:44:57.200
And again, you walk through that fire gracefully.
link |
01:45:01.640
So let me ask maybe about World War II or in general,
link |
01:45:08.400
what key moments in history of the 20th century
link |
01:45:12.360
do you think if something else happened at those moments,
link |
01:45:15.840
we could have avoided some of the big atrocities,
link |
01:45:18.200
Stalin's Baltimore, Hitler's Holocaust,
link |
01:45:21.160
Mao's Great Chinese Famine?
link |
01:45:25.640
The great turning point in world history
link |
01:45:28.600
is August the 2nd, 1914,
link |
01:45:33.840
when the British cabinet decides to intervene
link |
01:45:38.560
and what would have been a European war
link |
01:45:43.600
becomes a world war.
link |
01:45:46.000
And with British intervention,
link |
01:45:47.320
it becomes a massively larger and more protracted conflict.
link |
01:45:51.760
So very early in my career,
link |
01:45:53.240
I became very preoccupied with the deliberations
link |
01:45:55.720
on that day and the surprising decision
link |
01:46:00.720
that a liberal cabinet took to go to war,
link |
01:46:04.520
which you might not have bet on that morning
link |
01:46:06.480
because there seemed to be a majority of cabinet members
link |
01:46:10.680
who would be disinclined and only a minority,
link |
01:46:12.960
including Winston Churchill, who wanted to go to war.
link |
01:46:15.280
So that's one turning point.
link |
01:46:16.760
I often wish I could get my time machine working
link |
01:46:20.160
and go back and say, wait, stop.
link |
01:46:22.640
Just think about what you're going to do.
link |
01:46:24.320
And by the way, let me show you a video of Europe in 1918.
link |
01:46:28.920
So that's one.
link |
01:46:29.800
Can we linger on that one?
link |
01:46:31.520
That one, a lot of people push back on you
link |
01:46:37.880
because it's so difficult.
link |
01:46:40.560
So the idea is, if I could try to summarize,
link |
01:46:43.760
and you're the first person that made me think
link |
01:46:46.440
about this very uncomfortable thought,
link |
01:46:50.400
which is the ideas in World War I,
link |
01:46:54.360
it would be a better world if Britain stayed out of the war
link |
01:46:58.960
and Germany won.
link |
01:47:00.520
Right.
link |
01:47:03.880
Thinking now in retrospect at the whole story
link |
01:47:06.960
of the 20th century,
link |
01:47:08.000
thinking about Stalin's rule of 30 years,
link |
01:47:11.960
thinking about Hitler's rise to power
link |
01:47:14.560
and the atrocities of the Holocaust,
link |
01:47:18.360
but also like you said on the Eastern front,
link |
01:47:21.360
the death of tens of millions of people through the war
link |
01:47:25.960
and also sort of the political prisoners
link |
01:47:28.600
and the suffering connected to communism,
link |
01:47:30.680
connected to fascism, all those kinds of things.
link |
01:47:34.040
Well, that's one heck of an example
link |
01:47:37.880
of why you're just like fearless
link |
01:47:39.480
in this particular style
link |
01:47:42.000
of exploring counterfactual history.
link |
01:47:44.120
So can you elaborate on that idea
link |
01:47:47.360
and maybe why this was such an important day
link |
01:47:50.200
in human history?
link |
01:47:52.160
This argument was central to my book, The Pity of War.
link |
01:47:55.080
I also did an essay in virtual history about this
link |
01:47:58.360
and it's always amused me that from around that time,
link |
01:48:01.160
I began to be called a conservative historian
link |
01:48:03.200
because it's actually a very left wing argument.
link |
01:48:05.520
The people in 1914 who thought Britain should stay
link |
01:48:07.880
at the war were the left of the Labour Party,
link |
01:48:10.520
who split to become the Independent Labour Party.
link |
01:48:14.240
What would have happened?
link |
01:48:16.080
Well, first of all, Britain was not ready for war in 1914.
link |
01:48:19.920
There had not been conscription.
link |
01:48:21.080
The army was tiny.
link |
01:48:23.080
So Britain had failed to deter Germany.
link |
01:48:25.600
The Germans took the decision
link |
01:48:27.000
that they could risk going through Belgium
link |
01:48:30.960
using the Schlieffen Plan to fight their two front war.
link |
01:48:34.520
They calculated that Britain's intervention
link |
01:48:37.520
would either not happen or not matter.
link |
01:48:41.080
If Britain had been strategically committed
link |
01:48:46.360
to preventing Germany winning a war in Europe,
link |
01:48:48.920
they should have introduced conscription 10 years before,
link |
01:48:51.240
had a meaningful land army
link |
01:48:53.440
and that would have deterred the Germans.
link |
01:48:55.760
So the Liberal government provided the worst of both worlds,
link |
01:48:59.280
a commitment that was more or less secret to intervene
link |
01:49:03.320
that the public didn't know about.
link |
01:49:05.440
In fact, much of the Liberal Party didn't know about,
link |
01:49:07.600
but without really the means
link |
01:49:09.520
to make that intervention effective,
link |
01:49:11.280
a tiny army with just a few divisions.
link |
01:49:14.280
So it was perfectly reasonable to argue
link |
01:49:16.040
as a number of people did on August the 2nd, 1914,
link |
01:49:19.680
that Britain should not intervene.
link |
01:49:21.560
After all, Britain had not immediately intervened
link |
01:49:23.520
against the French Revolutionary armies back in the 1790s.
link |
01:49:27.160
It had played an offshore role, ultimately intervening,
link |
01:49:30.440
but not immediately intervening.
link |
01:49:32.800
If Britain had stayed out,
link |
01:49:35.280
I don't think that France would have collapsed immediately
link |
01:49:38.400
as it had in 1870.
link |
01:49:40.360
The French held up remarkably well
link |
01:49:42.360
to catastrophic casualties
link |
01:49:44.400
in the first six months of the First World War.
link |
01:49:47.760
But by 1916, I don't see how France could have kept going
link |
01:49:52.360
if Britain had not joined the war.
link |
01:49:54.840
And I think the war would have been over perhaps
link |
01:49:56.920
at some point in 1916.
link |
01:49:59.160
We know that Germany's aims
link |
01:50:00.520
would have been significantly limited
link |
01:50:02.320
because they would have needed to keep Britain out.
link |
01:50:04.480
If they'd succeeded in keeping Britain out,
link |
01:50:06.160
they'd have had to keep Britain out.
link |
01:50:07.680
And the way to keep Britain out was obviously
link |
01:50:09.160
not to make any annexation of Belgium,
link |
01:50:11.880
to limit German war aims,
link |
01:50:14.080
particularly to limit them to Eastern Europe.
link |
01:50:16.520
And from Britain's point of view, what was not to like?
link |
01:50:19.120
So the Russian Empire is defeated
link |
01:50:21.600
along with France.
link |
01:50:24.560
What does that really change?
link |
01:50:27.520
If the Germans are sensible
link |
01:50:29.800
and we can see what this might've looked like,
link |
01:50:33.840
they focus on Eastern Europe,
link |
01:50:35.880
they take chunks of the Russian Empire,
link |
01:50:38.440
perhaps they create as they did
link |
01:50:40.600
in the piece of Brest Litovsk,
link |
01:50:44.400
an independent or quasi independent Poland.
link |
01:50:47.120
In no way does that pose a threat to the British Empire.
link |
01:50:49.400
In fact, it's a good thing.
link |
01:50:52.080
Britain never had had a particularly good relationship
link |
01:50:54.400
with the Russian Empire after all.
link |
01:50:57.200
The key point here is that the Germany that emerges
link |
01:51:00.280
from victory in 1916 has a kind of European union.
link |
01:51:05.000
It's the dominant power of an enlarged Germany
link |
01:51:09.080
with a significant middle Europa,
link |
01:51:12.880
whatever you want to call it,
link |
01:51:13.800
customs union type arrangement with neighboring countries,
link |
01:51:17.360
including one suspects, Austria, Hungary.
link |
01:51:22.120
That is a very different world from the world of 1917, 18.
link |
01:51:27.360
The protraction of the war for a further two years,
link |
01:51:32.000
it's globalization,
link |
01:51:33.200
which Britain's intervention made inevitable.
link |
01:51:36.880
As Philip Zelikow showed in his recent book
link |
01:51:39.400
on the failure to make peace in 1916,
link |
01:51:43.480
Woodrow Wilson tried and failed to intervene
link |
01:51:46.040
and broker a peace in 1916.
link |
01:51:47.720
So I'm not the only counterfactualist here.
link |
01:51:50.800
The extension of the war for a further two years
link |
01:51:53.400
with escalating slaughter, the death toll rose
link |
01:51:56.120
because the industrial capacity of the armies grew greater.
link |
01:52:00.480
That's what condemns us to the Bolshevik revolution.
link |
01:52:04.400
And it's what condemns us ultimately to Nazism
link |
01:52:08.920
because it's out of the experience of defeat in 1918
link |
01:52:13.760
as Hitler makes clear in Mein Kampf
link |
01:52:15.600
that he becomes radicalized and enters the political realm.
link |
01:52:21.560
Take out those additional years of war
link |
01:52:23.920
and Hitler's just a failed artist.
link |
01:52:26.160
It's the end of the war that turns him into the demagogue.
link |
01:52:33.840
You asked what are the things
link |
01:52:34.920
that avoid the totalitarian states.
link |
01:52:38.880
As I've said,
link |
01:52:39.720
British nonintervention for me is the most plausible
link |
01:52:42.840
and it takes out all of that malignant history
link |
01:52:45.760
that follows from the Bolshevik revolution.
link |
01:52:48.280
It's very hard for me to see how Lenin gets anywhere
link |
01:52:51.000
if the war is over.
link |
01:52:53.760
That looks like the opportunity
link |
01:52:55.280
for the constitutional elements,
link |
01:52:59.800
the liberal elements in Russia.
link |
01:53:02.600
There are other moments at which you can imagine history
link |
01:53:05.800
taking a different path.
link |
01:53:07.480
If the provisional government in Russia
link |
01:53:11.160
had been more ruthless,
link |
01:53:13.880
it was very lenient towards the Bolsheviks,
link |
01:53:15.960
but if it had just rounded them up
link |
01:53:17.600
and shot the Bolshevik leadership,
link |
01:53:19.280
that would have certainly cut the Bolshevik revolution off.
link |
01:53:23.520
One looks back on the conduct of the Russian liberals
link |
01:53:27.720
with the kind of despair at their failure
link |
01:53:30.720
to see the scale of the threat that they faced
link |
01:53:33.240
and the ruthlessness that the Bolshevik leadership
link |
01:53:35.280
would evince. There's a counterfactual in Germany,
link |
01:53:38.720
which is interesting.
link |
01:53:40.520
I think the Weimar Republic destroyed itself
link |
01:53:43.480
in two disastrous economic calamities,
link |
01:53:48.480
the inflation and then the deflation.
link |
01:53:51.400
It's difficult for me to imagine Hitler
link |
01:53:53.320
getting to be Reich Chancellor
link |
01:53:56.760
without those huge economic disasters.
link |
01:53:59.680
So another part of my early work explored
link |
01:54:02.400
alternative policy options that the German Republic,
link |
01:54:06.360
the Weimar Republic might have pursued.
link |
01:54:09.840
There are other contingencies that spring to mind.
link |
01:54:12.760
In 1936 or 38, I think more plausibly 38,
link |
01:54:17.440
Britain should have gone to war.
link |
01:54:19.840
The great mistake was Munich.
link |
01:54:23.360
Hitler was in an extremely vulnerable position in 1938,
link |
01:54:27.560
because remember, he didn't have Russia squared away
link |
01:54:30.120
as he would in 1938.
link |
01:54:31.640
As he would in 1939.
link |
01:54:33.880
Chamberlain's mistake was to fold instead of going for war
link |
01:54:39.560
as Churchill rightly saw.
link |
01:54:41.160
And there was a magical opportunity there
link |
01:54:44.360
that would have played into the hands
link |
01:54:45.520
of the German military opposition and conservatives
link |
01:54:48.160
to snuff Hitler out over Czechoslovakia.
link |
01:54:52.960
I could go on.
link |
01:54:53.800
The point is that history is not some inexorable narrative,
link |
01:54:59.040
which can only end one way.
link |
01:55:01.200
It's a garden of forking paths.
link |
01:55:03.720
And many, many junctions in the road,
link |
01:55:09.160
there were choices that could have averted
link |
01:55:11.880
the calamities of the mid 20th century.
link |
01:55:14.360
I have to ask you about this moment,
link |
01:55:16.360
before you said I could go on,
link |
01:55:18.080
this moment of Chamberlain and Hitler,
link |
01:55:20.560
snuff Hitler out in terms of Czechoslovakia.
link |
01:55:25.280
And we'll return to the book Doom on this point.
link |
01:55:29.040
What does it take to be a great leader
link |
01:55:32.280
in the room with Hitler,
link |
01:55:33.640
or in the same time and space as Hitler,
link |
01:55:38.800
to snuff him out, to make the right decisions?
link |
01:55:44.000
So it sounds like you put quite a bit of a blame
link |
01:55:46.760
on the man, Chamberlain,
link |
01:55:49.040
and give credit to somebody like a Churchill.
link |
01:55:53.360
So what is the difference?
link |
01:55:54.280
Where's that line?
link |
01:55:55.400
You've also written a book about Henry Kissinger,
link |
01:55:58.920
who's an interesting sort of person
link |
01:56:01.200
that's been throughout many difficult decisions
link |
01:56:04.800
in the games of power.
link |
01:56:06.200
So what does it take to be a great leader in that moment?
link |
01:56:08.520
That particular moment, sorry to keep talking,
link |
01:56:10.640
is fascinating to me,
link |
01:56:12.280
because it feels like it's man on man conversations
link |
01:56:15.760
that define history.
link |
01:56:17.680
Well, Hitler was bluffing.
link |
01:56:19.600
He really wasn't ready for war in 1938.
link |
01:56:21.760
The German economy was clearly not ready for war in 1938.
link |
01:56:25.720
And Chamberlain made a fundamental miscalculation
link |
01:56:31.120
along with his advisors,
link |
01:56:32.360
because it wasn't all Chamberlain.
link |
01:56:33.720
He was in many ways articulating the establishment view.
link |
01:56:39.760
And I tried to show in a book called War of the World
link |
01:56:41.480
how that establishment worked.
link |
01:56:42.800
It extended through the BBC, into the aristocracy,
link |
01:56:46.160
to Oxford.
link |
01:56:47.000
There was an establishment view.
link |
01:56:48.080
Chamberlain personified it.
link |
01:56:49.800
Churchill was seen as a warmonger.
link |
01:56:53.080
He was at his lowest point of popularity in 1938.
link |
01:56:56.280
But what is it that Chamberlain gets wrong?
link |
01:56:59.080
Because it's conceptual.
link |
01:57:00.760
Chamberlain is persuaded that Britain has to play for time
link |
01:57:03.680
because Britain is not ready for war in 1938.
link |
01:57:06.800
He fails to see that the time that he gets,
link |
01:57:09.800
that he buys at Munich is also available to Hitler.
link |
01:57:13.520
Everybody gets the time
link |
01:57:15.200
and Hitler's able to do much more with it
link |
01:57:17.000
because Hitler strikes the pact with Stalin
link |
01:57:19.840
that guarantees that Germany can fight a war
link |
01:57:23.640
on one front in 1939.
link |
01:57:25.920
What does Chamberlain do?
link |
01:57:26.840
Build some more aircraft.
link |
01:57:28.760
So the great mistake of the strategy of appeasement
link |
01:57:31.320
was to play for time.
link |
01:57:32.800
I mean, they knew war was coming,
link |
01:57:34.120
but they were playing for time,
link |
01:57:35.080
not realizing that Hitler got the time too.
link |
01:57:39.160
And after he partitioned Czechoslovakia,
link |
01:57:42.000
he was in a much stronger position,
link |
01:57:43.760
not least because of all the resources
link |
01:57:45.400
that they were able to plunder from Czechoslovakia.
link |
01:57:50.760
So that was the conceptual mistake.
link |
01:57:52.720
Churchill played an heroic role in pointing out
link |
01:57:58.320
this mistake and predicting accurately
link |
01:58:00.960
that it would lead to war on worse terms.
link |
01:58:04.080
What does it take?
link |
01:58:05.680
It takes a distinct courage to be unpopular.
link |
01:58:11.360
And Churchill was deeply unpopular at that point.
link |
01:58:13.640
People would listen to him in the House of Commons
link |
01:58:16.480
in silence.
link |
01:58:17.760
On one occasion, Lady Astor shouted, rubbish.
link |
01:58:22.960
So he went through a period of being hated on.
link |
01:58:26.480
The other thing that made Churchill a formidable leader
link |
01:58:29.080
was that he always applied history to the problem.
link |
01:58:32.720
And that's why he gets it right.
link |
01:58:35.080
He sees the historical problem
link |
01:58:37.360
much more clearly than Chamberlain.
link |
01:58:39.880
So I think if you go back to 1938,
link |
01:58:44.320
there's no realistic counterfactual
link |
01:58:45.920
in which Churchill's in government in 1938.
link |
01:58:48.000
You have to have France collapse
link |
01:58:49.800
for Churchill to come into government.
link |
01:58:51.880
But you can certainly imagine a Tory elite
link |
01:58:57.240
that's thinking more clearly about the likely dynamics.
link |
01:59:02.360
They haven't seen this, I guess, problem of conjecture,
link |
01:59:06.320
to take a phrase from Kissinger,
link |
01:59:08.880
which is that whatever they're doing in postponing the war
link |
01:59:13.800
has the potential to create
link |
01:59:16.640
a worse starting point for the war.
link |
01:59:20.160
It would have been risky in 1938,
link |
01:59:21.920
but it was a way better situation
link |
01:59:23.640
than they ended up with in 1939, a year later.
link |
01:59:27.280
You asked about Kissinger,
link |
01:59:28.200
and I've learned a lot from reading Kissinger
link |
01:59:31.200
and talking to Kissinger since I embarked
link |
01:59:33.960
on writing his biography a great many years ago.
link |
01:59:37.120
So I think one of the most important things I've learned
link |
01:59:42.040
is that you can apply history to contemporary problems.
link |
01:59:46.600
It may be the most important tool that we have
link |
01:59:49.720
in that kind of decision making.
link |
01:59:52.800
You have to do it quite ruthlessly and rigorously.
link |
01:59:58.640
And in the moment of crisis, you have to take risk.
link |
02:00:03.360
So Kissinger often says in his early work,
link |
02:00:08.400
the temptation of the bureaucrat is to wait for more data,
link |
02:00:12.240
but ultimately the decision making
link |
02:00:14.520
that we do under uncertainty can't be based on data.
link |
02:00:18.480
The problem of conjecture is
link |
02:00:19.920
that you could take an action now and incur some cost,
link |
02:00:24.800
an avert disaster, but you'll get no thanks for it
link |
02:00:28.720
because nobody is grateful for an averted disaster.
link |
02:00:32.120
And nobody goes around saying, wasn't it wonderful
link |
02:00:34.480
how we didn't have another 9 11.
link |
02:00:38.280
On the other hand, you can do nothing,
link |
02:00:40.760
incur no upfront costs and hope for the best.
link |
02:00:44.120
And you might get lucky, the disaster might not happen.
link |
02:00:47.440
That's in a democratic system, the much easier path to take.
link |
02:00:54.280
And I think that the essence of leadership is to be ready
link |
02:00:59.520
to take that upfront cost, avert the disaster
link |
02:01:02.000
and accept that you won't get gratitude.
link |
02:01:05.360
If I may make a comment, an aside about Henry Kissinger.
link |
02:01:10.400
So he, I think at 98 years old currently has still got it.
link |
02:01:16.320
He's brilliant.
link |
02:01:17.720
It's very, very impressive.
link |
02:01:19.000
I can only hope that my brain has the same durability
link |
02:01:23.280
that his does because it's a formidable intellect
link |
02:01:26.080
and it's still in as sharp form as it was 50 years ago.
link |
02:01:31.080
So you mentioned Eric Schmidt's in his book
link |
02:01:34.200
and he reached out to me that he wanted to do this podcast.
link |
02:01:37.960
And I know Eric Schmidt, I've spoken to him before.
link |
02:01:41.320
I like him a lot, obviously.
link |
02:01:44.000
So they said, we could do a podcast for 40 minutes
link |
02:01:48.160
with Eric, 40 minutes with Eric and Henry together
link |
02:01:52.640
and 40 minutes with Henry.
link |
02:01:54.960
So those are three different conversations.
link |
02:01:58.040
And I had to like, I had to do some soul searching
link |
02:02:00.920
because I said, fine, 40 minutes with Eric.
link |
02:02:02.840
We'll probably talk many times again.
link |
02:02:04.800
Fine, let's talk about this AI book together
link |
02:02:07.520
for 40 minutes.
link |
02:02:09.240
But I said, what I wrote to them is that I would hate myself
link |
02:02:12.760
if I only have 40 minutes to talk to Henry Kissinger.
link |
02:02:16.640
And so I had to hold my ground, went back and forth
link |
02:02:18.840
and in the end decided to part ways over this.
link |
02:02:21.160
And I sometimes think about this kind of difficult decision
link |
02:02:25.840
in the podcasting space of when do you walk away?
link |
02:02:34.920
Because there's a particular world leader
link |
02:02:38.960
that I've mentioned in the past
link |
02:02:40.560
where the conversation is very likely to happen.
link |
02:02:43.960
And as it happens, those conversations could often be,
link |
02:02:50.760
unfortunately this person only has 30 minutes now.
link |
02:02:53.360
I know we agreed for three hours, but unfortunately,
link |
02:02:56.000
and you have to decide, do I stand my ground on this point?
link |
02:03:01.000
I suppose that's the thing that journalists
link |
02:03:03.160
have to think about, right?
link |
02:03:04.520
Like, do I hold onto my integrity
link |
02:03:09.920
in whatever form that takes?
link |
02:03:11.400
And do I stay my ground
link |
02:03:12.520
even if I lose a fascinating opportunity?
link |
02:03:16.120
Anyway, it's something I thought about
link |
02:03:17.960
and something I think about.
link |
02:03:19.720
And with Henry Kissinger, I mean,
link |
02:03:21.680
he's had a million amazing conversations in your biography,
link |
02:03:25.720
so it's not like something is lost,
link |
02:03:27.240
but it was still nevertheless to me
link |
02:03:28.880
some soul searching that I had to do
link |
02:03:30.760
as a kind of practice for what to me
link |
02:03:34.560
is a higher stakes conversation.
link |
02:03:36.800
I'll just mention it as Vladimir Putin.
link |
02:03:40.080
I can have a conversation with him
link |
02:03:41.720
unlike any conversation he's ever had,
link |
02:03:44.400
partially because I'm a fluent Russian speaker,
link |
02:03:47.800
partially because I'm messed up in the head
link |
02:03:49.600
in certain kinds of ways that make
link |
02:03:50.880
for an interesting dynamic,
link |
02:03:52.760
because we're both Judo people,
link |
02:03:54.400
we both are certain kinds of human beings
link |
02:03:58.560
that can have a much deeper apolitical conversation.
link |
02:04:02.120
I have to ask to stay on the topic of leadership.
link |
02:04:05.880
You've, in your book, Doom,
link |
02:04:08.360
have talked about wars, pandemics throughout human history,
link |
02:04:13.320
and in some sense, saying that all of these disasters
link |
02:04:18.480
are manmade.
link |
02:04:20.240
So humans have a role in terms of the magnitude
link |
02:04:23.560
of the effect that they have on human civilization.
link |
02:04:27.800
Without taking cheap political shots,
link |
02:04:30.200
can we talk about COVID 19?
link |
02:04:33.240
How will history remember the COVID 19 pandemic?
link |
02:04:38.040
What were the successes,
link |
02:04:39.880
what were the failures of leadership of man, of humans?
link |
02:04:44.880
Doom was a book that I was planning to write
link |
02:04:49.560
before the pandemic struck.
link |
02:04:52.320
As a history of the future based in large measure
link |
02:04:55.840
on science fiction.
link |
02:04:57.680
It had occurred to me in 2019
link |
02:04:59.400
that I had spent too long not reading science fiction,
link |
02:05:02.360
and so I decided I would liven up my intake
link |
02:05:08.880
by getting off history for a bit and reading science fiction.
link |
02:05:12.040
Because history is great at telling you about the perennial
link |
02:05:14.960
problems of power.
link |
02:05:16.440
Putin is always interesting on history.
link |
02:05:18.800
He's become something of a historian recently
link |
02:05:21.200
with his essays and lectures.
link |
02:05:23.720
But what history is bad at telling you is,
link |
02:05:25.480
well, what will the effects of discontinuity
link |
02:05:27.960
of technology be?
link |
02:05:29.720
And so I thought I need some science fiction
link |
02:05:31.360
to think more about this,
link |
02:05:32.480
because I'm tending to miss the importance
link |
02:05:36.360
of technological discontinuity.
link |
02:05:39.480
If you read a lot of science fiction,
link |
02:05:41.280
you read a lot of plague books,
link |
02:05:43.800
because science fiction writers are really quite fond
link |
02:05:46.960
of the plague scenario.
link |
02:05:48.520
So the world ends in many ways in science fiction,
link |
02:05:50.800
but one of the most popular is the lethal pandemic.
link |
02:05:52.960
So when the first email came to me,
link |
02:05:56.680
I think it was on January the 3rd
link |
02:05:58.160
from my medical friend, Justin Stebbing,
link |
02:06:00.200
funny pneumonia in Wuhan, my antennae began to tingle
link |
02:06:05.440
because it was just like one of those science fiction books
link |
02:06:08.520
that begins in just that moment.
link |
02:06:10.440
It begins in just that way.
link |
02:06:14.640
In a pandemic, as Larry Brilliant,
link |
02:06:18.840
the epidemiologist said many years ago,
link |
02:06:20.840
the key is early detection and early action.
link |
02:06:25.440
That's how you deal with a novel pathogen.
link |
02:06:28.800
And almost no Western country did that.
link |
02:06:31.840
We know it was doable because the Taiwanese
link |
02:06:33.840
and the South Koreans did it, and they did it very well.
link |
02:06:36.760
But really no Western country got this right.
link |
02:06:40.560
Some were unlucky because super spreader events
link |
02:06:43.160
happened earlier than in other countries.
link |
02:06:45.400
Italy was hit very hard very early.
link |
02:06:47.720
For other countries, the real disaster came quite late.
link |
02:06:50.280
Russia, which has only relatively recently
link |
02:06:53.240
had a really bad experience.
link |
02:06:56.560
The lesson for me is quite different from the one
link |
02:06:59.760
that most journalists thought they were learning last year.
link |
02:07:03.120
Most journalists last year thought,
link |
02:07:05.640
Trump is a terrible president.
link |
02:07:07.680
He's saying a lot of crazy things.
link |
02:07:10.080
It's his fault that we have high excess mortality
link |
02:07:12.640
in the United States.
link |
02:07:14.480
The same argument was being made by journalists in Britain,
link |
02:07:17.440
Boris Johnson, dot, dot, dot,
link |
02:07:19.280
Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, dot, dot, dot,
link |
02:07:21.680
even India, Narendra Modi, the same argument.
link |
02:07:26.400
And I think this argument is wrong in a few ways.
link |
02:07:30.120
It's true that the populist leaders said many crazy things,
link |
02:07:34.600
and broadly speaking gave poor guidance
link |
02:07:37.520
to their populations.
link |
02:07:40.760
But I don't think it's true to say
link |
02:07:43.520
that with different leaders,
link |
02:07:44.680
these countries would have done significantly better
link |
02:07:46.960
if Joe Biden had magically been president a year earlier.
link |
02:07:50.440
I don't think the US would have done much better
link |
02:07:52.440
because the things that caused excess mortality last year
link |
02:07:55.600
weren't presidential decisions.
link |
02:07:57.080
They were utter failure of CDC to provide testing.
link |
02:08:00.960
That definitely wasn't Trump's fault.
link |
02:08:03.000
Scott Gottlieb's book makes that very clear.
link |
02:08:04.920
It's just been published recently.
link |
02:08:06.880
We utterly failed to use technology for contact tracing,
link |
02:08:10.200
which the Koreans did very well.
link |
02:08:12.600
We didn't really quarantine anybody seriously.
link |
02:08:16.640
There was no enforcement of quarantine.
link |
02:08:19.160
And we exposed the elderly to the virus
link |
02:08:21.120
as quickly as possible in elderly care homes.
link |
02:08:23.520
And these things had very little to do
link |
02:08:25.760
with presidential incompetence.
link |
02:08:28.120
So I think leadership is of somewhat marginal importance
link |
02:08:33.680
in a crisis like this,
link |
02:08:34.720
because what you really need
link |
02:08:35.640
is your public health bureaucracy to get it right.
link |
02:08:38.120
And very few Western public health bureaucracies
link |
02:08:40.560
got it right.
link |
02:08:42.200
Could the president have given better leadership?
link |
02:08:45.440
Yes.
link |
02:08:47.080
His correct strategy, however,
link |
02:08:49.400
was to learn from Barack Obama's playbook
link |
02:08:52.760
with the opioid epidemic.
link |
02:08:55.200
The opioid epidemic killed as many people
link |
02:08:58.040
Obama's watch as COVID did on Trump's watch.
link |
02:09:01.840
And it was worse in a sense
link |
02:09:03.160
because it only happened in the US.
link |
02:09:05.040
And each year it killed more people
link |
02:09:06.920
than the year before, over eight years.
link |
02:09:09.200
Nobody to my knowledge has ever seriously blamed Obama
link |
02:09:12.640
for the opioid epidemic.
link |
02:09:14.760
Trump's mistake was to put himself front and center
link |
02:09:17.560
of the response to claim that he had some unique insight
link |
02:09:21.040
into the pandemic and to say with every passing week,
link |
02:09:24.800
more and more foolish things
link |
02:09:26.080
until even a significant portion of people
link |
02:09:29.160
who'd voted for him in 2016 realized that he'd blown it,
link |
02:09:32.080
which was why he lost the election.
link |
02:09:34.160
The correct strategy was actually to make Mike Pence
link |
02:09:37.920
the pandemic czar and get the hell out of the way.
link |
02:09:41.000
That's what my advice to Trump would have been.
link |
02:09:42.760
In fact, it was in February of last year.
link |
02:09:45.720
So the mistake was to try to lead,
link |
02:09:49.960
but actually leadership in a pandemic
link |
02:09:52.560
is almost a contradiction in terms.
link |
02:09:54.080
What you really need is your public health bureaucracy
link |
02:09:56.680
not to fuck it up.
link |
02:09:58.360
And they really, really fucked it up.
link |
02:10:00.440
And that was then all blamed on Trump.
link |
02:10:02.960
Jim Fallows writes a piece in the Atlantic that says,
link |
02:10:05.400
well, being the president's like flying a light aircraft,
link |
02:10:07.760
it's pilot error.
link |
02:10:09.000
And I read that piece and I thought,
link |
02:10:10.520
does he really after all the years he spent writing
link |
02:10:13.160
think that being president is like flying a light aircraft?
link |
02:10:16.160
I mean, it's really nothing like flying a light aircraft.
link |
02:10:19.160
Being president is you sit on top of a vast bureaucracy
link |
02:10:22.360
with how many different agencies, 60, 70,
link |
02:10:24.400
we've all lost count.
link |
02:10:25.920
And you're surrounded by advisors,
link |
02:10:27.720
at least a quarter of whom are saying, this is a disaster.
link |
02:10:30.600
We have to close the borders.
link |
02:10:31.760
And the others are saying, no, no,
link |
02:10:33.520
we have to keep the economy going.
link |
02:10:34.680
That's what you're running on in November.
link |
02:10:37.120
So being a president in a pandemic
link |
02:10:39.160
is a very unenviable position
link |
02:10:42.000
because you actually can't really determine
link |
02:10:45.440
whether your public health bureaucracy
link |
02:10:47.240
will get it right or not.
link |
02:10:48.320
You don't think to push back on that,
link |
02:10:50.360
just like being Churchill in a war is difficult.
link |
02:10:54.120
So leaving Trump by an aside,
link |
02:10:57.040
what I would love to see from a president
link |
02:10:58.920
is somebody who makes great speeches
link |
02:11:03.240
and arouses the public to push the bureaucracy,
link |
02:11:06.400
the public health bureaucracy,
link |
02:11:08.200
to get their shit together,
link |
02:11:09.760
to fire certain kinds of people.
link |
02:11:11.560
I mean, I'm sorry, but I'm a big fan of powerful speeches,
link |
02:11:15.160
especially in the modern age with the internet.
link |
02:11:17.360
It can really move people.
link |
02:11:19.520
Instead, the lack of speeches
link |
02:11:23.080
resulted in certain kinds of forces
link |
02:11:27.520
amplifying division over whether to wear masks or not,
link |
02:11:31.360
or it's almost like the public picked some random topic
link |
02:11:35.840
over which to divide themselves.
link |
02:11:37.640
And there was like a complete indecision,
link |
02:11:39.800
which is really what it was,
link |
02:11:41.360
fear of uncertainty materializing itself
link |
02:11:45.200
in some kind of division.
link |
02:11:46.400
And then you almost like busy yourself
link |
02:11:48.960
with the red versus blue politics,
link |
02:11:50.960
as opposed to some, I don't know,
link |
02:11:52.480
FDR type character just stands and say,
link |
02:11:57.640
fuck all this bullshit that we're hearing.
link |
02:11:59.840
We're going to manufacture 5 billion tests.
link |
02:12:02.680
This is what America is great at.
link |
02:12:04.280
We're going to build
link |
02:12:05.600
the greatest testing infrastructure ever built,
link |
02:12:08.760
or something, or even with the vaccine development.
link |
02:12:12.520
But that was what I was about to interject.
link |
02:12:15.240
In a pandemic, the most important thing is the vaccine.
link |
02:12:18.400
If you get that right,
link |
02:12:19.520
then you should be forgiven for much else.
link |
02:12:21.560
And that was the one thing
link |
02:12:22.400
the Trump administration got right,
link |
02:12:23.840
because they went around the bureaucracy
link |
02:12:27.480
with Operation Warp Speed
link |
02:12:28.840
and achieved a really major success.
link |
02:12:33.240
So I think the paradox of the 2020 story
link |
02:12:40.080
in the United States is that the one thing that mattered most
link |
02:12:43.040
the Trump administration got right,
link |
02:12:45.680
and it got so much else wrong
link |
02:12:47.600
that was sort of marginal,
link |
02:12:49.080
that we were left with the impression
link |
02:12:50.980
that Trump had been to blame for the whole disaster,
link |
02:12:53.920
which wasn't really quite right.
link |
02:12:56.360
Sure, it would have been great
link |
02:12:57.500
if we did Operation Warp Speed for testing,
link |
02:12:59.960
but ultimately vaccines are more important than tests.
link |
02:13:02.920
And this brings me to the question
link |
02:13:06.960
that you raised there of polarization and why that happened.
link |
02:13:11.740
Now, in a book called The Square and the Tower,
link |
02:13:13.960
I argued that it would be very costly for the United States
link |
02:13:17.140
to allow the public sphere to continue to be dominated
link |
02:13:20.720
by a handful of big tech companies,
link |
02:13:22.440
that this ultimately would have more adverse effects
link |
02:13:25.280
than simply contested elections.
link |
02:13:27.400
And I think we saw over the past 18 months
link |
02:13:31.280
just how bad this could be,
link |
02:13:32.800
because the odd thing about this country
link |
02:13:37.720
is that we came up with vaccines with 90 plus percent efficacy
link |
02:13:42.260
and about 20% of people refused to get them
link |
02:13:44.920
and still do refuse for reasons that seem best explained
link |
02:13:52.400
in terms of the anti vaccine network,
link |
02:13:54.200
which has been embedded on the internet for a long time,
link |
02:13:56.920
predating the pandemic.
link |
02:13:58.620
Renny DiResta wrote about this pre 2020.
link |
02:14:02.480
And this anti vaccine network has turned out
link |
02:14:04.760
to kill maybe 200,000 Americans
link |
02:14:07.000
who could have been vaccinated,
link |
02:14:08.220
but were persuaded through magical thinking
link |
02:14:11.080
that the vaccine was riskier than the virus.
link |
02:14:14.000
Whereas you don't need to be an epidemiologist,
link |
02:14:17.000
you don't need to be a medical scientist
link |
02:14:18.400
to know that the virus is about two orders
link |
02:14:20.640
of magnitude riskier than the vaccine.
link |
02:14:23.880
So again, leadership could definitely have been better.
link |
02:14:30.000
But the politicization of everything
link |
02:14:33.600
was not Trump's doing alone.
link |
02:14:35.440
It happened because our public sphere has been dominated
link |
02:14:39.760
by a handful of platforms whose business model
link |
02:14:43.920
inherently promotes polarization,
link |
02:14:46.040
inherently promotes fake news and extreme views,
link |
02:14:49.080
because those are the things that get the eyeballs
link |
02:14:51.380
on the screens and sell the ads.
link |
02:14:53.180
I mean, this is now a commonplace.
link |
02:14:55.120
But when one thinks about the cost
link |
02:14:57.300
of allowing this kind of thing to happen,
link |
02:15:01.840
it's now a very high human cost.
link |
02:15:04.120
And we were foolish to leave uncorrected
link |
02:15:06.960
these structural problems in the public sphere
link |
02:15:09.280
that were already very clearly visible in 2016.
link |
02:15:12.800
And you described that, like you mentioned,
link |
02:15:16.080
that there's these networks that are almost like
link |
02:15:18.280
laying dormant, waiting for their time in the sun,
link |
02:15:22.820
and they stepped forward in this case.
link |
02:15:25.360
And that those network effects just disservice catalyst
link |
02:15:30.120
for whatever the bad parts of human nature.
link |
02:15:34.460
I do hope that there's kinds of networks
link |
02:15:36.360
that emphasize the better angels of our nature,
link |
02:15:38.720
to quote Steven Pinker.
link |
02:15:40.800
It's just clearly, and we know this
link |
02:15:43.560
from all the revelations of the Facebook whistleblower,
link |
02:15:46.400
there is clearly a very clear tension
link |
02:15:49.800
between the business model of a company like Facebook
link |
02:15:54.160
and the public good, and they know that.
link |
02:15:57.720
I just talked to the founder of Instagram.
link |
02:16:00.320
Yes, that's the case, but it's not,
link |
02:16:03.880
from a technology perspective,
link |
02:16:06.280
absolutely true of any kind of social network.
link |
02:16:08.560
I think it's possible to build,
link |
02:16:09.900
actually I think it's not just possible,
link |
02:16:12.080
I think it's pretty easy if you set that as the goal,
link |
02:16:15.020
to build social networks
link |
02:16:16.840
that don't have these negative effects.
link |
02:16:20.680
Right, but if the business model is we sell ads,
link |
02:16:26.120
and the way you sell ads is to maximize user engagement,
link |
02:16:30.200
then the algorithm is biased
link |
02:16:31.680
in favor of fake news and extreme views.
link |
02:16:33.880
So it's not the ads, a lot of people blame the ads.
link |
02:16:36.560
The problem I think is the engagement,
link |
02:16:40.360
and the engagement is just the easiest,
link |
02:16:42.040
the dumbest way to sell the ads.
link |
02:16:43.880
I think there's much different metrics
link |
02:16:46.120
that could be used to make a lot more money
link |
02:16:48.760
than the engagement in the long term.
link |
02:16:50.960
It has more to do with planning for the long term,
link |
02:16:53.440
so optimizing the selling of ads
link |
02:16:56.680
to make people happy with themselves in the long term,
link |
02:17:01.680
as opposed to some kind of addicted like dopamine feeling.
link |
02:17:07.360
And so that's, to me that has to do with metrics
link |
02:17:09.960
and measuring things correctly
link |
02:17:11.320
and sort of also creating a culture
link |
02:17:13.520
with what's valued to have difficult conversations
link |
02:17:16.760
about what we're doing with society,
link |
02:17:18.400
all those kinds of things.
link |
02:17:19.560
And I think once you have those conversations,
link |
02:17:22.000
this takes us back to the University of Austin,
link |
02:17:23.800
kind of once you have those difficult human conversations,
link |
02:17:27.060
you can design the technology that will actually make
link |
02:17:30.000
for help people grow,
link |
02:17:32.560
become the best version of themselves,
link |
02:17:34.240
help them be happy in the long term.
link |
02:17:36.840
What gives you hope about the future?
link |
02:17:41.880
As somebody who studied some of the darker moments
link |
02:17:44.520
of human history, what gives you hope?
link |
02:17:49.200
A couple of things.
link |
02:17:52.540
First of all, the United States
link |
02:17:56.520
has a very unique operating system.
link |
02:17:58.860
Which was very well designed by the founders
link |
02:18:02.200
who'd thought a lot about history
link |
02:18:03.640
and realized it would take quite a novel design
link |
02:18:07.880
to prevent the republic going the way of all republics
link |
02:18:10.920
because republics tend to end up as tyrannies
link |
02:18:12.920
for reasons that were well established
link |
02:18:14.980
by the time of the Renaissance.
link |
02:18:16.920
And it gives me hope that this design has worked very well
link |
02:18:20.680
and withstood an enormous stress test in the last year.
link |
02:18:25.580
I became an American in 2018, I think one of the most
link |
02:18:31.360
important features of this operating system
link |
02:18:34.440
is that it is the magnet for talent.
link |
02:18:38.860
Here we sit, part of the immigration story
link |
02:18:45.640
in a darkened room with funny accents.
link |
02:18:50.040
A Scot and a Russian walk into a recording studio
link |
02:18:54.480
and talk about America, it's very much like a joke.
link |
02:18:58.000
And Elon's a South African and so on,
link |
02:18:59.800
and Teal is a German.
link |
02:19:00.760
And we're extraordinarily fortunate
link |
02:19:03.760
that the natives let us come and play
link |
02:19:07.140
and play in a way that we could not
link |
02:19:09.760
in our countries of birth.
link |
02:19:12.040
And as long as the United States continues
link |
02:19:14.360
to exploit that superpower, that it is the talent magnet,
link |
02:19:18.760
then it should out innovate
link |
02:19:20.760
the totalitarian competition every time.
link |
02:19:24.300
So that's one reason for being an optimist.
link |
02:19:30.460
Another reason, and it's quite a historical reason
link |
02:19:33.200
as you would expect from me.
link |
02:19:35.640
Another reason that I'm optimistic
link |
02:19:39.040
is that my kids give me a great deal of hope.
link |
02:19:45.080
They range in age from 27 down to four,
link |
02:19:48.720
but each of them in their different way
link |
02:19:52.760
seems to be finding a way through this crazy time of ours
link |
02:19:58.800
without losing contact with that culture
link |
02:20:04.840
and civilization that I hold dear.
link |
02:20:08.080
I don't want to live in the metaverse
link |
02:20:10.040
as Mark Zuckerberg imagines it.
link |
02:20:12.660
To me, that's a kind of ghastly hell.
link |
02:20:15.920
I think Western civilization is the best civilization.
link |
02:20:20.920
And I think that almost all the truths
link |
02:20:23.860
about the human condition can be found
link |
02:20:27.440
in Western literature, art, and music.
link |
02:20:34.320
And I think also that the civilization
link |
02:20:36.960
that produced the scientific revolution
link |
02:20:38.960
has produced the great problem solving tool
link |
02:20:42.840
that eluded the other civilizations
link |
02:20:44.640
that never really cracked science.
link |
02:20:47.480
And what gives me hope is that
link |
02:20:50.720
despite all the temptations and distractions
link |
02:20:53.600
that their generation had to contend with,
link |
02:20:57.440
my children in their different ways
link |
02:20:58.920
have found their way to literature
link |
02:21:03.040
and to art and to music, and they are civilized.
link |
02:21:09.280
And I don't claim much of the credit for that,
link |
02:21:14.040
I've done my best,
link |
02:21:15.160
but I think it's deeply encouraging
link |
02:21:17.880
that they found their way to the things
link |
02:21:21.580
that I think are indispensable for a happy life,
link |
02:21:25.200
a fulfilled life.
link |
02:21:26.560
Nobody, I think, can be truly fulfilled
link |
02:21:30.240
if they're cut off from the great body
link |
02:21:32.100
of Western literature, for example.
link |
02:21:34.320
I've thought a lot about Elon's argument
link |
02:21:38.240
that we might be in a simulation.
link |
02:21:41.600
No, no, there is a simulation, it's called literature.
link |
02:21:44.980
And we just have to decide whether or not to enter it.
link |
02:21:49.160
I'm currently in the midst of the later stages
link |
02:21:53.320
of Proust's great A l´heure échec du temps perdu,
link |
02:21:57.360
and Proust's observation of human relationships
link |
02:22:01.480
is perhaps more meticulous than that of any other writer.
link |
02:22:05.720
And it's impossible not to find yourself identifying
link |
02:22:09.520
with Marcel and his obsessive, jealous relationships,
link |
02:22:14.440
particularly with Albertine.
link |
02:22:17.380
It's the simulation.
link |
02:22:18.480
And you decide, I think, as a sentient being,
link |
02:22:23.520
how far to, in your own life,
link |
02:22:26.960
reenact these more profound experiences
link |
02:22:30.480
that others have written down.
link |
02:22:31.960
One of my earliest literary simulations
link |
02:22:34.320
was to reenact Jack Kerouac's Trippin on the Road
link |
02:22:37.480
when I was 17, culminating in getting very wasted
link |
02:22:40.680
in the Hanging Gardens of Xochimilco, not to be missed.
link |
02:22:44.840
And it hit me, just as I was reading Proust,
link |
02:22:48.720
that that's really how to live a rich life,
link |
02:22:51.160
that one lives life, but one lives it
link |
02:22:53.720
juxtaposing one's own experience
link |
02:22:56.280
against the more refined experiences of the great writers.
link |
02:23:00.440
So it gives me hope that my children do that a bit.
link |
02:23:04.400
Do you include the Russian authors in the canon?
link |
02:23:09.400
Yes, I don't read Russian,
link |
02:23:12.920
but I was entirely obsessed
link |
02:23:14.880
with Russian literature as a schoolboy.
link |
02:23:17.160
I read my way through Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Turgenev,
link |
02:23:22.200
I, Chekhov.
link |
02:23:24.840
I think of all of those writers,
link |
02:23:29.960
Tolstoy had the biggest impact
link |
02:23:31.600
because at the end of War and Peace,
link |
02:23:33.340
there's this great essay on historical determinism,
link |
02:23:36.020
which I think was the reason I became a historian.
link |
02:23:39.680
But I'm really temperamentally a kind of Turgenev person,
link |
02:23:46.940
oddly enough.
link |
02:23:48.140
I think if you haven't read those novelists,
link |
02:23:51.060
I mean, you can't really be a complete human being
link |
02:23:54.160
if you haven't read the Brothers Karamazov.
link |
02:23:57.740
You're not really, you're not grown up.
link |
02:24:00.960
And so I think in many ways,
link |
02:24:02.840
those are the greatest novels.
link |
02:24:05.960
Raskolnikov, remember Raskolnikov's Nightmare
link |
02:24:09.440
at the end of Crime and Punishment,
link |
02:24:12.240
in which he imagines in his dream
link |
02:24:15.320
a world in which a terrible virus spreads.
link |
02:24:19.420
Do you remember this?
link |
02:24:20.640
And this virus has the effect of making every individual
link |
02:24:23.560
think that what he believes is right.
link |
02:24:27.640
And in this self righteousness,
link |
02:24:31.960
people fall on one another and commit appalling violence.
link |
02:24:36.920
That's Raskolnikov's Nightmare, and it's a prophecy.
link |
02:24:39.580
It's a terrible prophecy of Russia's future.
link |
02:24:44.040
Yeah, and coupled with that is probably the,
link |
02:24:47.800
I also like the French, the existentialists, all that.
link |
02:24:50.520
The full spectrum and German's Hermann Hesse
link |
02:24:53.880
and just that range of human thought
link |
02:24:57.100
as expressed in the literature is fascinating.
link |
02:24:58.680
I really love your idea that the simulation,
link |
02:25:04.520
like one way to live life
link |
02:25:08.200
is to kind of explore these other worlds
link |
02:25:11.840
and borrow from them wisdom
link |
02:25:14.940
that you then just map onto your own lives.
link |
02:25:17.560
You almost like stitch together your life
link |
02:25:20.120
with these kind of pieces from literature.
link |
02:25:22.360
The highly educated person is constantly struck by illusion.
link |
02:25:27.360
Everything is an illusion to something that one has read.
link |
02:25:32.400
And that is the simulation.
link |
02:25:34.880
That's what the real metaverse is.
link |
02:25:38.200
It's the imaginary world that we enter when we read,
link |
02:25:42.040
empathize, and then recognize in our daily lives
link |
02:25:45.780
some scrap of the shared experience
link |
02:25:48.960
that literature gives us.
link |
02:25:51.020
Yeah, I think I've aspired to be the idiot
link |
02:25:54.320
from Prince Mishkin from Dostoevsky
link |
02:25:57.280
and in aspiring to be that,
link |
02:25:59.800
I have become the idiot, I feel, at least in part.
link |
02:26:06.640
What, you mentioned the human condition,
link |
02:26:09.240
does love have to do?
link |
02:26:12.400
What role does it play in the human condition?
link |
02:26:15.080
Friendship, love.
link |
02:26:20.240
Love is the drug.
link |
02:26:24.160
Love is, this was the great Roxy music line
link |
02:26:32.640
that Brian Ferry wrote.
link |
02:26:33.980
And love is the most powerful
link |
02:26:37.320
and dangerous of all the drugs.
link |
02:26:41.120
The driving force that overrides our reason.
link |
02:26:46.120
And of course, it is the primal urge.
link |
02:26:53.120
So what a civilized society has to do
link |
02:26:57.120
is to prevent that drug, that primal force
link |
02:27:00.800
from creating mayhem.
link |
02:27:03.680
So there have to be rules like monogamy
link |
02:27:08.000
and rituals like marriage that reign love in.
link |
02:27:13.000
And make the addicts at least more or less under control.
link |
02:27:21.000
And I think that's part of why I'm a romantic
link |
02:27:27.000
rather than a Steve Pinker, enlightenment rationalist.
link |
02:27:32.320
Because the romantics realized that love was the drug.
link |
02:27:37.800
It's like,
link |
02:27:39.120
the difference in sensibility between Handel and Wagner.
link |
02:27:45.760
And I had a Wagnerian phase when I was an undergraduate.
link |
02:27:49.160
And I still remember thinking that in,
link |
02:27:54.520
as old as Lieberstod,
link |
02:27:56.560
that Wagner had got the closest to sex
link |
02:27:59.000
that anybody had ever got in music,
link |
02:28:03.280
or perhaps to love.
link |
02:28:05.120
I'm lucky that I love my wife and that we were,
link |
02:28:12.360
by the time we met, you know, smart enough to understand
link |
02:28:18.080
that love is a drug that you have to kind of take
link |
02:28:22.080
in certain careful ways.
link |
02:28:25.520
And that it works best in the context of a stable relationship
link |
02:28:30.520
it works best in the context of a stable family.
link |
02:28:36.600
That's the key thing.
link |
02:28:38.200
That one has to sort of take the drug
link |
02:28:40.560
and then submit to the conventions
link |
02:28:44.400
of marriage and family life.
link |
02:28:47.360
I think in that respect, I'm a kind of tamed romantic.
link |
02:28:55.680
Tamed romantic.
link |
02:28:56.680
That's how I'd like to think of myself.
link |
02:28:58.000
The degree to which your romanticism is tamed
link |
02:29:01.040
can be then channeled into productive work.
link |
02:29:03.320
That's why you are a historian and a writer
link |
02:29:05.560
is the best that love is channeled through the writing.
link |
02:29:08.040
So if you're going to be addicted to anything,
link |
02:29:09.760
be addicted to work.
link |
02:29:12.360
I mean, we're all addictive,
link |
02:29:13.600
but the thing about workaholism
link |
02:29:15.680
is that it is the most productive addiction.
link |
02:29:19.840
And rather that than drugs or booze.
link |
02:29:22.880
So yes, I'm always trying to channel my anxieties
link |
02:29:27.480
into work.
link |
02:29:28.800
I learned that at a relatively early age,
link |
02:29:31.320
it's a sort of massively productive way
link |
02:29:33.640
of coping with the inner demons.
link |
02:29:36.560
And again, we should teach kids that
link |
02:29:39.360
because let's come back to our earlier conversation
link |
02:29:42.960
about universities.
link |
02:29:43.800
Part of what happens at university
link |
02:29:45.120
is that adolescents have to overcome all the inner demons.
link |
02:29:49.400
And these include deep insecurity
link |
02:29:52.760
about one's appearance, about one's intellect,
link |
02:29:55.600
and then madly raging hormones
link |
02:29:58.240
that cause you to behave like a complete fool
link |
02:30:00.520
with the people to whom you're sexually attracted.
link |
02:30:03.120
All of this is going on in the university.
link |
02:30:05.520
How can it be a safe space?
link |
02:30:07.080
It's a completely dangerous space by definition.
link |
02:30:11.840
So yeah, I learned teaching young people
link |
02:30:13.560
how to manage these storms,
link |
02:30:16.920
that's part of the job.
link |
02:30:18.120
And we're really not allowed to do that anymore
link |
02:30:20.800
because we can't talk about these things
link |
02:30:22.120
for fear of the Title IX officers kicking down the door
link |
02:30:24.680
and dragging us off in chains.
link |
02:30:26.880
And like you said, hard work
link |
02:30:28.760
and something you call work ethic in civilization
link |
02:30:35.800
is a pretty effective way to achieve, I think,
link |
02:30:39.320
a kind of happiness in a world that's full of anxiety.
link |
02:30:42.120
Or at least exhaustion so that you sleep well.
link |
02:30:46.680
Well, there is beauty to the exhaustion too.
link |
02:30:49.320
That's why running, there's manual work
link |
02:30:52.600
that some part of us is built for that.
link |
02:30:55.280
Right.
link |
02:30:56.120
I mean, we are products of evolution
link |
02:30:59.560
and our adaptation to a technological world
link |
02:31:03.480
is a very imperfect one.
link |
02:31:04.720
So hence the kind of masochistic urge to run.
link |
02:31:11.080
I like outdoor exercise.
link |
02:31:14.160
I don't really like gyms.
link |
02:31:16.240
So I'll go for long punishing runs in woodland,
link |
02:31:21.240
hike up hills.
link |
02:31:24.280
I like swimming in lakes and in the sea
link |
02:31:27.920
because there just has to be that physical activity
link |
02:31:32.720
in order to do the good mental work.
link |
02:31:34.680
And so it's all about trying to do the best work.
link |
02:31:39.960
That's my sense that we have
link |
02:31:43.760
some random allocation of talent.
link |
02:31:45.760
You kind of figure out what it is
link |
02:31:47.320
that you're relatively good at
link |
02:31:48.960
and you try to do that well.
link |
02:31:51.240
I think my father encouraged me to think that way.
link |
02:31:55.120
And you don't mind about being average at the other stuff.
link |
02:31:58.520
The kind of sick thing
link |
02:31:59.680
is to try to be brilliant at everything.
link |
02:32:01.280
I hate those people.
link |
02:32:02.760
Should really not worry too much
link |
02:32:04.960
if you're just an average double bass player, which I am,
link |
02:32:08.480
or kind of average skier, which I definitely am.
link |
02:32:12.160
Doing those things okay
link |
02:32:13.560
is part of leading a rich and fulfilling life.
link |
02:32:16.640
I was not a good actor,
link |
02:32:19.000
but I got a lot out of acting as an undergraduate.
link |
02:32:22.800
Turned out after three years of experimentation at Oxford
link |
02:32:25.680
that I was, broadly speaking,
link |
02:32:27.720
better at writing history essays than my peers.
link |
02:32:32.880
And that was my edge.
link |
02:32:34.280
That was my comparative advantage.
link |
02:32:35.800
And so I've just tried to make a living
link |
02:32:37.840
from that slight edge.
link |
02:32:40.280
Yeah, that's a beautiful way to describe a life.
link |
02:32:44.600
Is there a meaning to this thing?
link |
02:32:46.440
Is there a meaning to life?
link |
02:32:47.920
What is the meaning of life?
link |
02:32:49.880
I was brought up by a physicist and a physician.
link |
02:32:54.360
They were more or less committed atheists
link |
02:32:56.560
who had left the Church of Scotland
link |
02:32:59.440
as a protest against sectarianism in Glasgow.
link |
02:33:03.400
And so my sister and I were told from an early age
link |
02:33:05.600
life was a cosmic accident, and that was it.
link |
02:33:10.600
There was no great meaning to it, and I can't really
link |
02:33:18.120
get past that.
link |
02:33:19.840
Isn't there beauty to being an accident at a cosmic scale?
link |
02:33:24.440
Yes, I wasn't taught to feel negative about that.
link |
02:33:27.840
And if anything, it was a frivolous insight
link |
02:33:32.360
that the whole thing was a kind of joke.
link |
02:33:34.840
And I think that atheism isn't really a basis
link |
02:33:40.440
for ordering a society, but it's been all right for me.
link |
02:33:46.720
I don't have a kind of sense of a missing religious faith.
link |
02:33:53.440
For me, however, there's clearly some embedded
link |
02:33:59.520
Christian ethics in the way my parents lived.
link |
02:34:03.800
And so we were kind of atheist Calvinists
link |
02:34:08.360
who had kind of deposed God, but carried on behaving
link |
02:34:11.520
as if we were members of the elect in a moral universe.
link |
02:34:14.280
So that's kind of the state of mind that I was left in.
link |
02:34:21.160
And I think that we aren't really around long enough
link |
02:34:29.280
to claim that our individual lives have meaning.
link |
02:34:31.960
But what Edmund Burke said is true.
link |
02:34:35.720
The real social contract is between the generations,
link |
02:34:38.640
between the dead, the living, and the unborn.
link |
02:34:41.120
And the meaning of life is, for me at least,
link |
02:34:45.720
to live in a way that honors the dead,
link |
02:34:48.120
seeks to learn from their accumulated wisdom
link |
02:34:50.520
because they do still outnumber us.
link |
02:34:52.120
They outnumber the living by quite a significant margin.
link |
02:34:55.960
And then to be mindful of the unborn
link |
02:34:58.720
and our responsibility to them.
link |
02:35:03.560
Writing books is a way of communicating with the unborn.
link |
02:35:07.800
It may or may not succeed, and probably won't succeed
link |
02:35:10.720
if my books are never assigned
link |
02:35:12.160
by work professors in the future.
link |
02:35:14.520
So what we have to do is more than just write books
link |
02:35:16.760
and record podcasts, there have to be institutions.
link |
02:35:20.560
I'm 57 now.
link |
02:35:22.280
I realized recently that succession planning
link |
02:35:25.200
had to be the main focus of the next 20 years
link |
02:35:29.000
because there are things that I really care about
link |
02:35:33.960
that I want future generations to have access to.
link |
02:35:38.040
And so the meaning of life I do regard
link |
02:35:41.080
as being intergenerational transfer of wisdom.
link |
02:35:46.360
Ultimately the species will go extinct at some point.
link |
02:35:50.440
Even if we do colonize Mars, one senses
link |
02:35:53.160
that physics will catch up with this particular organism,
link |
02:35:56.800
but it's in the pretty far distant future.
link |
02:35:59.800
And so the meaning of life is to make sure
link |
02:36:01.760
that for as long as there are human beings,
link |
02:36:04.960
they are able to live the kind of fulfilled lives,
link |
02:36:11.120
ethically fulfilled, intellectually fulfilled,
link |
02:36:14.320
emotionally fulfilled lives
link |
02:36:16.280
that civilization has made possible.
link |
02:36:19.080
It would be easy for us to revert to the uncivilized world.
link |
02:36:24.520
There's a fantastic book that I'm going to misremember.
link |
02:36:30.000
Milosz is the captive soul, the captive mind rather,
link |
02:36:34.160
which has a fantastic passage.
link |
02:36:38.680
He was a Polish intellectual who says,
link |
02:36:43.000
Americans can never imagine what it's like
link |
02:36:46.040
for civilization to be completely destroyed
link |
02:36:49.320
as it was in Poland by the end of World War II,
link |
02:36:52.560
to have no rule of law, to have no security of even person,
link |
02:36:56.760
nevermind property rights.
link |
02:36:58.200
They can't imagine what that's like
link |
02:36:59.840
and what it will lead you to do.
link |
02:37:03.000
So one reason for teaching history
link |
02:37:04.600
is to remind the lucky Generation Z members
link |
02:37:10.200
of California that civilization is a thin film.
link |
02:37:15.200
And it can be destroyed remarkably easily.
link |
02:37:18.040
And to preserve civilization
link |
02:37:19.640
is a tremendous responsibility that we have.
link |
02:37:23.000
It's a huge responsibility.
link |
02:37:25.280
And we must not destroy ourselves,
link |
02:37:27.720
whether it's in the name of wokeism
link |
02:37:30.400
or the pursuit of the metaverse.
link |
02:37:33.120
Preserving civilization and making it available,
link |
02:37:35.520
not just to our kids, but to people we'll never know,
link |
02:37:38.480
generations ahead, that's the meaning.
link |
02:37:40.640
And do so by studying the lessons of history.
link |
02:37:45.040
Right, not only studying them, but then acting on them.
link |
02:37:48.560
For me, the biggest problem is,
link |
02:37:50.120
how do we apply history more effectively?
link |
02:37:53.160
It seems as if our institutions, including government,
link |
02:37:56.440
are very, very bad at applying history.
link |
02:37:59.640
Lessons of history are learned poorly, if at all.
link |
02:38:02.400
Analogies are drawn crudely.
link |
02:38:04.280
Often the wrong inferences are drawn.
link |
02:38:06.480
One of the big intellectual challenges for me
link |
02:38:08.360
is how to make history more useful.
link |
02:38:12.280
And this was the kind of thing that professors used to hate,
link |
02:38:15.120
but really practically useful,
link |
02:38:16.920
so that policymakers and citizens
link |
02:38:19.920
can think about the decisions that they face
link |
02:38:22.120
with a more historically informed body of knowledge.
link |
02:38:27.120
Whether it's a pandemic, the challenge of climate change,
link |
02:38:29.880
what to do about Taiwan.
link |
02:38:31.800
I can't think of a better set of things to know
link |
02:38:36.800
before you make decisions about those things
link |
02:38:39.040
than the things that history has to offer.
link |
02:38:41.400
Well, I love the discipline of applied history,
link |
02:38:43.560
basically going to history and saying,
link |
02:38:45.520
what are the key principles here
link |
02:38:50.040
that are applicable to the problems of today?
link |
02:38:52.600
Right.
link |
02:38:53.440
And how can we solve that?
link |
02:38:54.280
The great philosopher of history, R.G. Collingwood,
link |
02:38:57.320
said in his autobiography, which was published in 1939,
link |
02:39:01.160
that the purpose of history was to reconstitute
link |
02:39:05.360
past thought from whatever surviving remnants there were,
link |
02:39:10.320
and then to juxtapose it with our own predicament.
link |
02:39:14.520
And that's that juxtaposition of past experience
link |
02:39:17.400
with present experience that is so important.
link |
02:39:19.840
We don't do that well.
link |
02:39:22.160
And indeed, we've flipped it
link |
02:39:24.080
so that academic historians now think their mission
link |
02:39:26.520
is to travel back to the past with the value system of 2021
link |
02:39:31.400
and castigate the dead for their racism and sexism
link |
02:39:36.160
and transphobia and whatnot.
link |
02:39:38.400
And that's exactly wrong.
link |
02:39:40.440
Our mission is to go back and try to understand
link |
02:39:42.240
what it was like to live in the 18th century,
link |
02:39:44.960
not to go back and condescend to the people of the past.
link |
02:39:49.040
And once we've had a better understanding,
link |
02:39:51.200
once we've seen into their lives, read their words,
link |
02:39:53.640
tried to reconstitute their experience,
link |
02:39:55.480
to come back and understand our own time better,
link |
02:39:58.720
that's what we should really be doing.
link |
02:40:00.320
That's what we should really be doing.
link |
02:40:01.920
But academic history has gone completely haywire,
link |
02:40:04.120
and it does almost the exact opposite
link |
02:40:05.760
of what I think it should do.
link |
02:40:07.520
And by studying history, walk beautifully, gracefully
link |
02:40:11.880
through this simulation, as you described,
link |
02:40:14.400
by mapping the lessons of history into the world of today.
link |
02:40:17.800
We have virtual reality already in our heads.
link |
02:40:20.560
We do not need Oculus and the metaverse.
link |
02:40:24.440
This was an incredible, hopeful conversation
link |
02:40:27.080
in many ways that I did not expect.
link |
02:40:29.560
I thought our conversation would be much more
link |
02:40:31.280
about history than about the future,
link |
02:40:33.160
and it turned out to be the opposite.
link |
02:40:35.080
Thank you so much for talking to me today.
link |
02:40:36.360
It's a huge honor to finally meet you, to talk to you.
link |
02:40:38.720
Thank you for your valuable time.
link |
02:40:40.640
Thank you, Lex, and good luck with Putin.
link |
02:40:43.480
Thanks for listening to this conversation
link |
02:40:45.200
with Neil Ferguson.
link |
02:40:46.520
To support this podcast,
link |
02:40:47.880
please check out our sponsors in the description.
link |
02:40:50.680
And now, let me leave you with some words
link |
02:40:52.720
from Neil Ferguson himself.
link |
02:40:54.760
No civilization, no matter how mighty it may appear
link |
02:40:57.920
to itself, is indestructible.
link |
02:41:00.480
Thank you for listening, and hope to see you next time.